[TravelerKai]

I just looked through his stuff just now. The passwords used are absolutely terrible. Some of them were "welcome". Bruh..... 1990 wants it's password back...

I'm not sure what he has that would be of interest. What he has posted just looks like random documents and those phone numbers. If anything all he is doing is proving the point that a kid could hack these idiots.

[Kickb]

Seems like hes showing some proof that he accessed email accounts or phones or whatever. Probably wants to get paid for the good stuff!

[Samseau]

(08-12-2016 06:41 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

So now it is confirmed that Guccifer is a Russian Operative?

He maintains Russia never told him to do anything.

[TravelerKai]

(08-12-2016 07:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 06:41 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

So now it is confirmed that Guccifer is a Russian Operative?

He maintains Russia never told him to do anything.

Right but that article in your post says otherwise. The MSM keeps pushing that narrative to get away from the fact that they are breaking the law, dirty, and incompetent at network security.

[TravelerKai]

(08-12-2016 07:07 PM)Kickb Wrote:  

Seems like hes showing some proof that he accessed email accounts or phones or whatever. Probably wants to get paid for the good stuff!

Money would make it easier to get caught in a lot of ways. It's not like MSM pays what TMZ pays for juicy dirt. That said a smaller outfit might toss him a bone. Hackers gotta eat too I suppose.

[beta_plus]

(08-12-2016 08:18 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 07:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 06:41 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

So now it is confirmed that Guccifer is a Russian Operative?

He maintains Russia never told him to do anything.

Right but that article in your post says otherwise. The MSM keeps pushing that narrative to get away from the fact that they are breaking the law, dirty, and incompetent at network security.

Definitely agree the MSM is desperate to keep a lid on this.

While Steve Sailer says that spilling the beans is part of the KGB's playbook, this doesn't feel like their MO. It would be far more useful to be able to blackmail an entire political party of the United States.

Also, after the cyber security "experts" said the Sony hack was by North Korea, when after a few months it became pretty obvious that it wasn't and probably an inside job, I'm not buying the Ruskies did this. Though I would not be surprised if they know who did it and are turning a blind eye.

[Sp5]

(08-12-2016 11:59 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 01:01 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 11:21 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 07:01 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Assange has said that he would not go to Sweden because he was afraid that Sweden would hold on him the suspected US warrants related to the Bradley Manning classified data leak. That never made sense to me. If the UK, the US's closest ally, would not hold him for a warrant, why would Sweden?

Just like with anyone else, the pressure of being a "guest" in a small embassy for four years has been getting to Assange. The bogus scorned women "rape" charges oriented him against feminism, hence he hates Hillary. This guy Rich may or may not be the source of the DNC leaks, Assange might be playing a political game, particularly if it's true he has been talking to Roger Stone.

Or it's because many high ranking members of the DNC have been calling for Julian's death:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/763380671796678656

"Everyone" said they wanted Assange killed after the Manning leaks, if by "everyone" you mean has-beens, "pundits," and talking heads with no means to do it.

Sorry you're not making any sense, if the lower peons are calling for Assange's head it's only because they are repeating what they know their bosses want. That's how things work in the sycophant party, I mean the Democrat party.

Yes, I have to explain further. You are right, this minor talking head "strategist" got orders from the DNC to call for Assange to be killed after the Manning leaks SIX YEARS AGO.

The DNC got the memo from the future telling them that Assange was going to leak the DNC server in SIX YEARS.



Why didn't they just beef up their net security? I don't know, better to have Assange assassinated I guess. It didn't work, he still lives and still leaked the DNC server.

What was really diabolical is that the DNC was able to get many Republicans to call for Assange being killed or put in Guantanamo at the same time. Even though Assange was going to leak the DNC server!

http://www.theatlantic.com/international...nge/67440/

Seriously, I don't know if people just don't see the propaganda inherent in taking old news out of context and slapping a present tense verb on it. "Democratic Hillary strategist calls for the assassination of Julian Assange."

I don't know about you, but I don't use the present tense for things that happened in 2010.

[El Chinito loco]

The elites want Assange's head on a platter primarily for the Bradley Manning leaks.

The dates line up pretty well.

In early 2010 Bradley Manning gave the HDD to Assange. Manning was arrested in May 2010. They "debriefed" Manning and probably got all the details of his associations with Assange.

The bogus rape charges against Assange were leveled against him around November the same year in Sweden. They tried to detain him in any way possible as damage control.

How convenient.

They wanted his ass bad after those military leaks.

I would not be surprised at all if they want to outright kill him after the DNC stuff though. He's shown to be a real threat to business as usual politics too.

I really believe they will try and kill him if he's ever set free or ends up in prison.

[Sp5]

The Manning leaks were mildly interesting pablum compared to the sensational Snowden leaks.

Manning just leaked some low-classified diplomatic and routine military reports, only up to Secret. Sure there are some things worth reading in the diplomatic cables, particularly if you live in a foreign country (e.g. Secret cables on Thai royal family) but mostly stuff already reported in the press. The videotape of the Apache was a bit brutal, but not a surprise either.

Snowden revealed the whole architecture of total monitoring and information control, even GCHQ doing information operations on the internet, and the monitoring of Angela Merkel's and other leader's phone conversations. The real secrets, Top Secret Sensitive Compartmented Information.

Greenwald should be more of a target than Assange, because Greenwald is more disciplined and is a real writer and critic of the system.

Assange/Wikileaks not much different than whoever runs Cryptome in the quality of material.

They would kill Greenwald before Assange.

[TravelerKai]

(08-13-2016 02:27 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

The Manning leaks were mildly interesting pablum compared to the sensational Snowden leaks.

Manning just leaked some low-classified diplomatic and routine military reports, only up to Secret. Sure there are some things worth reading in the diplomatic cables, particularly if you live in a foreign country (e.g. Secret cables on Thai royal family) but mostly stuff already reported in the press. The videotape of the Apache was a bit brutal, but not a surprise either.

Snowden revealed the whole architecture of total monitoring and information control, even GCHQ doing information operations on the internet, and the monitoring of Angela Merkel's and other leader's phone conversations. The real secrets, Top Secret Sensitive Compartmented Information.

Greenwald should be more of a target than Assange, because Greenwald is more disciplined and is a real writer and critic of the system.

Assange/Wikileaks not much different than whoever runs Cryptome in the quality of material.

They would kill Greenwald before Assange.

I agree that Greenwald makes more sense as a target, but he is not only an American citizen, but he is a famous journalist. The federal government is not supposed to assassinate American citizens. Killing him would have been a terrible move completely devoid of social awareness. Obama has put more journalists in jail than any other president combined by the time this had happened. I think he knew jailing Greenwald would backfire tremendously.

That would have been like throwing Anderson Cooper or Ron Suskind into prison, for doing something the journalists at the Times did with Daniel Ellsberg with those Pentagon Papers.

Assange is not a US citizen, so he eligible to be assassinated by the CIA. They seem to have a hard on about him hacking the US. I would love to see the evidence on that, but the truth is, they could kill him and not answer to the American public. Republicans and Democrats alike called for him to be killed. You already know that bi-partisan support on something like this means automatically, no inquiries will be opened.

The only ones that might open an inquiry would be EU, UK, or UN. We all know that stuff doesn't count for crap.

[Samseau]

(08-13-2016 12:59 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 11:59 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(08-12-2016 01:01 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 11:21 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 07:01 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

Assange has said that he would not go to Sweden because he was afraid that Sweden would hold on him the suspected US warrants related to the Bradley Manning classified data leak. That never made sense to me. If the UK, the US's closest ally, would not hold him for a warrant, why would Sweden?

Just like with anyone else, the pressure of being a "guest" in a small embassy for four years has been getting to Assange. The bogus scorned women "rape" charges oriented him against feminism, hence he hates Hillary. This guy Rich may or may not be the source of the DNC leaks, Assange might be playing a political game, particularly if it's true he has been talking to Roger Stone.

Or it's because many high ranking members of the DNC have been calling for Julian's death:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/763380671796678656

"Everyone" said they wanted Assange killed after the Manning leaks, if by "everyone" you mean has-beens, "pundits," and talking heads with no means to do it.

Sorry you're not making any sense, if the lower peons are calling for Assange's head it's only because they are repeating what they know their bosses want. That's how things work in the sycophant party, I mean the Democrat party.

Yes, I have to explain further. You are right, this minor talking head "strategist" got orders from the DNC to call for Assange to be killed after the Manning leaks SIX YEARS AGO.

Again you're not making sense. I never said they gave orders, I said they repeat what they know their bosses WANT.

It's the SYCOPHANT party for a reason.

These lower peons are calling for Assange's head because the bosses want the exact same thing. You'd have to be extremely naive not to understand this.

[budoslavic]

Julian Assange New Revelation About Hillary Clinton's VP Tim Kaine

[Samseau]

The smoking gun - pay for play email:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20280

[Dr. Howard]

(08-15-2016 09:08 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

The smoking gun - pay for play email:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20280

Jeez. That Jackie Lopez should be fired from her law firm or at least suspended without pay until she watches Saul Goodman on breaking bad 40 times over...you don't write "PAY FOR PLAY" in an email.

Its like asking "So, what do we do with all of the laundered drug money after it comes out of the front business?"

[budoslavic]

[Adonis]

Via Cernovich. Now we know their likely response to another leak.

[budoslavic]

Nancy Pelosi's computer got hacked by Guccifer 2.0. Talk about DNC being not only the most corrupted party, but also add racist, race baiting, anti-police and anti-America to their character traits of not wanting to help the country as a whole.

From InfoWars:

Quote:

HACKED DEM MEMO WARNS AGAINST SAYING ‘ALL LIVES MATTER’ NEAR BLM ACTIVISTS
Guccifer 2.0 releases new documents allegedly hacked from Nancy Pelosi's computer

A confidential memo leaked by the hacker Guccifer 2.0 Wednesday reveals tactics used by Democrats when dealing with “radical” Black Lives Matter activists.

GUCCIFER 2.0 @GUCCIFER_2
#DCCC Docs from #Pelosi’s PC #Guccifer2
https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/08/31/pelosi/ …

Hi everyone As you see I’ve been gradually posting DCCC docs on different states. But besides that I have a folder from the Nancy Pelosi’s PC and I’d like to share some docs from
guccifer2.wordpress.com
12:32 AM - 31 Aug 2016

The November 2015 memorandum, allegedly taken from U.S. Representative Nancy Pelosi’s computer, details the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s (DCCC) recommendations regarding encounters with the controversial group.
“This document should not be emailed or handed to anyone outside of the building,” the memo says in bold text.



The document breaks down the central demands of the “radical movement” and notes the acquittal of George Zimmerman as the group’s launching point.
Tactics for interacting with BLM activists include using “Frontline district staff” for meetings with preferably “small groups” or individuals to learn of members’ concerns.



The document continues by warning that Democrat staffers should “Lead From Behind” given BLM’s fear “of politicians that hijack their message to win campaigns.”
Democrats and their staff are further warned to never claim “all lives matter” or mention “black on black crime” in front of BLM supporters.
“These are all viewed as red herring attacks,” the document notes. “This response will garner additional media scrutiny and only anger BLM activists.”

“This is the worst response.”



Other documents in the release include talking points on the Islamic State as well as the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya.
“As you see I’ve been gradually posting DCCC docs on different states,” Guccifer 2.0 wrote on his blog late Wednesday. “But besides that I have a folder from the Nancy Pelosi’s PC and I’d like to share some docs from it with you. They are related to immigration, Hispanics, BLM, Islam and other issues.”
These latest documents follow a slew of other releases from Democratic organizations as well as groups run by prominent figures such as George Soros.

Although metadata and other evidence left behind by Guccifer 2.0 thus far supports the theory of Russian government involvement, numerous questions remain.

[budoslavic]

Assange grills NYT reporter after question on Russia

Quote:

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange slapped down a New York Times reporter and issued a blistering critique of the publication on Wednesday after being pressed repeatedly on whether his organization is secretly in cahoots with Russia.

The exchange came in a video interview between the Times' Jo Becker and Assange. "To the extent that certain leaks benefit other countries, I'm thinking particularly ... Russia, is that a coincidence?" Becker asked during one extended line of questioning on the issue. "Sorry, say that again?" Assange replied.

"I'm saying that if certain leaks benefit certain countries, for instance — " Becker attempted to respond before Assange cut her off. "This is absurd. This is like saying the New York Times publishes something ... 'Is Putin going to use it as a talking point?' Ridiculous.

"What kind of consideration is that to take into account if you have a mission to publish the press documents from whistleblowers and others to educate the public?" Assange asked. "You obviously can't be second-guessing yourself at an editorial level like that."

Assange asked Becker if the Times would have published information leaked from the Democratic National Committee. "Would you? Would you, the New York Times, having received information about the election, saying the DNC leaks, not publish it, or suspend it until after the election?"

Becker demurred, blaming a reader for the question about Russia. "Well, that's a reader's question. I think what I was getting at is that you would in fact prioritize those documents that come about an election, because you feel it's important to publish while voters are making a decision. Is that correct?"

Assange asked again whether the Times would publish the information, after which Becker admitted that she wasn't sure. "Well, I noticed you dodged the question there. Would the New York Times publish the DNC leaks?"

"Well, we've certainly written about the DNC leaks. I mean, I can't speak for the entire newspaper," Becker responded.

"I would hope very much that the New York Times would. I think, probably, it would publish some stories, it might not do others. It has after all editorially endorsed one of the candidates and not the other," Assange said in reference to the paper's support for Hillary Clinton.

"Obviously, whistleblowers and whatever source comes to you with whatever motivation, they're not going to go to all that effort just to have you sit on that material and let it rot," Assange added.

[ColSpanker]

The DNC is flooding my area with cute college girls as organizers. Perhaps the next time one of them hits me up, I'll ask them about the leak.
Seriously, it sucks to live in a battleground district. The Blue's are throwing everything they can at the local advertisement and worse. I can't turn on the TV without hearing about the greatness of some hag the blue team wants to shove on us. Every four years a caddy shows up driven by a fancy lawyer full of college dweebs who go door-to-door. I was out working on my steps one time and one of the little twerps tried to talk up the blue candidate to me. He ran off crying when I challenged him. They just don't make activists like they used to. I suppose it will only get worse with Trump on the rise.
Thought about following the next group around with a "Vote For Jill Stein" just to mess with them.

[CynicalContrarian]

Oh...? :

@musalbas 52m52 minutes ago

"Guccifer 2.0 just released 600MB of new internal DNC documents at a conference in London."

[TravelerKai]

Yeah looks like he sent in a speech and has new stuff. He hasn't put it on his blog or supplied a link on Twitter yet though. It's supposed to have donor information in it.

[Vienna]

(09-13-2016 11:16 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

Yeah looks like he sent in a speech and has new stuff. He hasn't put it on his blog or supplied a link on Twitter yet though. It's supposed to have donor information in it.

Can we expect public access this week?

[TravelerKai]

(09-13-2016 11:19 AM)DarianFrey Wrote:  

(09-13-2016 11:16 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

Yeah looks like he sent in a speech and has new stuff. He hasn't put it on his blog or supplied a link on Twitter yet though. It's supposed to have donor information in it.

Can we expect public access this week?

Probably. He isn't the type to cocktease the public like Wikileaks does. Might be up on his wordpress website in hours. I have been standing by this week and watching the Congress hearings, etc. and keeping an eye out for new stuff. If I see it before others, I'll post a link in the thread.

[Samseau]

[CynicalContrarian]

(09-13-2016 11:19 AM)DarianFrey Wrote:  

Can we expect public access this week?

Access via proxy & firewall etc.? :

@YogSotho Screen shows GuCCif3r_2.0

@oscaron include parentheses.