Quote: (08-16-2015 03:29 PM)MikeS Wrote:
Is it even possible to use personalized and often efficient features of modern technologies without silently or explicitly consenting to sharing a hell of a lot of data that can potentially be cause for "privacy concerns"?
My technological life is made at least somewhat more convenient by Google knowing - by tracking my habits and reading my emails - where I live (including where I'm temporarily staying during a vacation), when my plane is leaving and whether it's on time, how I get from the airport to the hotel, which additional articles may be pertinent to a topic I'm currently reading, offering me free unlimited cloud storage of all the photos and videos I shoot with my smartphone. And assorted other more or less helpful features by Google as well as some app creators and - when I upgrade to Windows 10, and probably already to some extent in Windows 7 - Microsoft.
Now I do get the major problems that blatant security issues like lacking data encryption can potentially cause for the individual user (though I severely doubt targeted attacks is one of them, more like being unfortunate enough to be one among thousands to eg. have their credit card info stolen from an unsecured server), but personally I don't really care whether a Google robot scans my emails for flight times and hotel bookings, or even read the rest of my emails to compile a profile for targeted advertising.
I imagine there are billions of Google accounts, it's probably doubtful that Carl The Coder in Google server park no. 752 is spending his lunch break reading my personal correspondence with my aunt in Germany. Or for that matter digging out information that might help him commit fraud in my name.
I get the principle being the privacy concerns, I'm just not convinced that not caring is likely to make any difference whatsoever to most people's lives. Perhaps if you're a major public figure that anyone outside of friends and family actually give a rat's ass about. But even so - what are issues? Is Microsoft going to expose the affair that Mr. Major Politician was having with that hooker he sent an email to from his MS email account?
Or are hackers going to intercept incriminating information between Mr. M. P.'s Windows 10 laptop and the Microsoft servers? Even if that's possible it seems like there are usually more efficient - or at least alternative - ways to target individuals through their data.
Great post mate.
Let me begin by saying the reason why major tech companies are increasingly infringing upon our privacy is because the general public says nothing, and
this is primarily because they have such a profound lack of understanding of the architecture. You don't have to be a UNIX-environment superuser who knows the intricacies of reverse engineering software and assembly language to have a general understanding with whats going on with your computer, and how your computer "talks" to the rest of the world!
Because the cultural zietgeist tends to trend toward 1-3 different tech "giants" people tend to miss the fact that there are other equally efficient technologies, or that there are available patterns of usage that do respect your privacy. Unfortunately, with Windows 10, Microsoft has clearly strayed away from caring about its users, however, like I said in the original post, there's nothing wrong with going OS X or Linux and having greater control over your privacy and being able to boot into Windows as needed.
Linux is still the best when it comes to having full control over your computer - you can choose a distribution like Ubuntu which is very user friendly and still respects your privacy. Software developers across the world are also increasingly supporting Linux as well as OSX/Windows.
Apple, while they have their own privacy concerns, now absolutely gives you more control over what you share as opposed to Google/MS products - although to be fair, its hard to remove yourself off the grid entirely.
WRT Google - I completely respect your opinion, but I've found it to cause issues. I travel a lot, and make sure to go abroad at least 1-2 times per year minimum. I've often had my Google accounts banned when it finds me in a different IP - most recently I was in Mexico a few months ago, and I essentially couldn't log into my accounts until I made it back to the USA, unless I had either contacted CSR or tried to it validated through my phone which would have been blocked on the Provider level because I was roaming.
I opened up a protonmail account (protonmail.ch), and have never looked back. My Gmail is now used solely for corporate spam.
Unfortunately, in my opinion again, the "tailored for you" searching has steadily turned Google into a less useful search engine than I like. Now, the front pages are often rife with advertisements and less useful content if I'd like to search something NEW.
One expert calls it the "Filter Bubble" - in tailoring results for *you*, you end up missing out on other content you have not discovered yet. See more about it here:
http://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_bew...anguage=en
I must insist that this part is definitely my opinion, and you're certainly free to like their tracking in "tailored for you" content!
Targeted attacks are often started by spear phishing, and someone like you(maybe, I don't know your career) or myself don't have as much to worry about as Roosh would....Especially with the Canadian media having him in the crosshairs. ""hey Roosh, download this PDF (which contains malicious executables that your antivirus won't pick up)!"" Should you change careers or change your path in life to become a more desirable target for whatever reason, it will inevitably become a concern for you all of a sudden. So why not preemptively protect your ass now?
For example, research institutions are huge targets to state-sponsored Chinese and Russian hackers. I hate to break it to you, but Carl the Coder doesn't really give a shit about yours or my data.....right now. Whats to say you become a person of interest to them later as you progress through your life?
A relative of mine is in
childrens medicine, of all things, and his hospital is often the target of network related attacks, which is downright repulsive, but its a reality he faces every couple weeks.
And it does come into issue with HIPAA/PCI/etc. Compliance when Microsoft now has your sensitive data on your local filesystem. This has malpractice written all over it.
Is the all powerful Cloud
™ really that useful, or are USB 3.0 drives / LAN / SFTP, the former of two which require no network connection better for sharing your files across devices? I guess thats up to your opinion, but for me, I'm fully aware of the vulnerabilities that iCloud/Dropbox/etc have (Hello, Jennifer Lawrence nudes!), and I don't have to worry about any corporation having access to the pictures I have of lovely ladies I have known and loved.
Every single additional access point created to secretly share your data with corporates is also a newly added attack vector.
Finally, and most importantly, the one small part on your post that I did find a bit misguided:
"I'm just not convinced that not caring is likely to make any difference whatsoever to most people's lives."
It makes a world of difference, actually. Just 10 years ago, the software companies you trusted weren't injecting your browser with cookies that you can't delete, and filling your harddrive with malware. Even the free market struggles when
certain companies are given a pass over others.
We are very blessed that Net Neutrality was recently passed into law, because otherwise, your Network providers would have throttled your connection to certain sites on the Internet. And, mark my words, the "Manosphere" sites we frequent WOULD get throttled at some point, as the general public considers it hate speech. If net neutrality advocates didn't care, the Internet as we know it would already be, and increasingly become, a completely different place.
http://www.androidheadlines.com/2015/08/...peeds.html (a big win for net neutrality advocates, but their fight is not over yet)
Do you know why they begin to take these affordances? Because no one acted.
I leave you with this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...