Paul Joseph Watson has been on a roll lately taking on feminists, and SJW's.
"Feminism is a trade union for ugly women"- Peregrine
Quote: (08-03-2015 08:51 PM)Seth_Rose Wrote:
This video is fan-fucking-tastic
Glad to see Paul Joseph Watson and Infowars going after SJW's
Quote: (12-24-2015 08:27 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:
There has to be some precedent here to change things, because the globalist corporate state is only getting more powerful.
Quote: (12-24-2015 08:27 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:
Facebook censored one of Watson's articles. So I thought I'd post that here to broadcast it. So that when anyone does a search for FACEBOOK CENSORSHIP, this will come up in Google.
Watson had written a piece on a refugee raping a Swedish woman. Here is the place where it was yesterday. It's gone now. Apparently, it was removed because Facebook considered anti-migrant posts to be "xenophobic”.
(I also left a comment there but there is no record of that in my Facebook Activity Log, so they're now erasing history.)
Anyway, Watson wrote a story about the censorship at Infowars.com. You can find that here.
***
I've seen liberals on my Facebook page in favor of corporate censorship because it tends to suit their agenda. They make it clear the First Amendment "only applies to the government censoring speech."
I'm not a Constitutional scholar by any means. But it's occurring to me that when you have a country where corporations control most means of communication (i.e. newspapers, Facebook, Twitter), then you've basically sold out the First Amendment to business and/or made it irrelevant.
Is there a way around this? Could a person have sued the old Bell Telephone company, for example, if it had its operators cut off phone calls they deemed as "inappropriate?" Would this, then, apply to social media?
There has to be some precedent here to change things, because the globalist corporate state is only getting more powerful.
Quote: (06-03-2016 06:31 AM)Snowplow Wrote:
...
"Let's just keep triggering the little shits, it's hilarious."
Still on a roll!
Quote: (12-24-2015 08:27 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:
I've seen liberals on my Facebook page in favor of corporate censorship because it tends to suit their agenda. They make it clear the First Amendment "only applies to the government censoring speech."
I'm not a Constitutional scholar by any means. But it's occurring to me that when you have a country where corporations control most means of communication (i.e. newspapers, Facebook, Twitter), then you've basically sold out the First Amendment to business and/or made it irrelevant.
Quote:Quote:
Paul Joseph Watson@PrisonPlanet 20 hours ago
If this is your mom, tell her to stay away from the Internet.