Earlier I posted a map that I made in this thread. You can find a full description there and that map represents the world as it is today. Basically the darker red the more culturally marxist the country, with feminist women, distorted gender roles, and generally a mediocre family structure. The lighter green the country, the more it has feminine women, traditionally evolved gender roles, and a sound family structure. The number in each country represents the total amount of women's/gender studies programs in colleges/universities in a country.
The map below is a modified version of that map to show how I think western feminism will spread over the next several years.
Red arrow = spread of feminism
Green arrow = force of resistance
For example, there are millions of Mexican immigrants living in the United States today. I know several Mexican women. Here they are taught to organize around minority rights/incentives, latino advocacy, and feminist teachings - many are drawn to it, though not all. As their numbers, wealth, and influence grow they will spread these beliefs and values across the border into Mexico. I see no resistance.
Hence the red arrow into Mexico with no green arrow pointed back.
As a matter of fact I see only pockets of token resistance in all of Latin America. I expect South America and Mexico to turn pink over the years, especially the more globalized metropolitan populations. I expect the numbers on women's/gender studies programs to increase, and eventually some will turn red on the map (e.g. Brazil). The growing latino population of the United States, the business ties, and media influence of Hollywood, music, magazines, and the Internet will all but insure this.
Globalization is a powerful force. The large red arrows shooting out of the United States represent the spread of feminist and cultural marxist values through globalization.
In Europe, the situation is similar, but there are two important areas of resistance: Russia to the east and Islam to the south. In a bizarre twist of irony, the Iron Curtain protected the economically marxist Soviet Union from the spread of cultural marxism from the west. Two decades later and after the rise of the European Union, the situation is different.
How long can a country such as Poland, virtually surrounded by a sea of red maintain her traditional culture? Poland shares the latin alphabet as well as Roman Catholic religion. A rising standard of living, ease of travel, and further integration into the EU spells a recipe for cultural disaster for Poland. How long until politically fueled grants from Brussels quadruples the amount of women's/gender studies programs. Coupled with globalization, Poland women may soon have the attitude of Czech women, and Czech women the attitude of Germans.
The Baltic states will continue to embrace NATO, the EU, and western institutions to ensure the do not have to fear for their autonomy from Russian domination. Belarus and Ukraine will do the same, although perhaps to a lesser degree. Undoubtedly the common ties of the Orthodox Church and the Cyrillic alphabet system, large Russian populations, and slavic blood ties them more to Russia. Russia will attempt to exert her political will, although it will remain unwanted in all of these states. To what degree will Ukraine and Belarus decline?
Russia will attempt to maintain it's rich culture and extend it's political influence. Hopefully globalization and outside influence will not wear her thin. To the south Islamic countries provide resistance to the spread of feminism, and their immigrants in the future may outbreed and fail to integrate culturally with western European nations, thereby causing cultural and political division.
South Korea may influence Japan, but Japan is a xenophobic country. Although their youth seem disaffected, they are an aging population and therefore not prone to vast cultural shifts such as occurred with American baby boomers. I see resistance from Japan, but influence through western globalization. They will mostly retain their traditional culture.
China as well is an aging population and therefore less exposed to vast cultural shifts, though they are becoming increasingly wealthy and more susceptible to globalization. They have a rich and ancient culture, sufficient language differences, and vast numbers. I see them as turning a darker green on the map. The same applies to SE Asia, although Singapore and the Phillipines will be under more direct western exposure.
India is similar to China, but has millions of Indians in the west, and was once colonized by the British. I do not see this influence as sufficient enough to overcome their vast numbers, and ancient/rich religious and cultural beliefs. Although perhaps because of their western ties they may be more eager to accept negative influences through globalization. I see them as becoming a darker green shade, but mostly unaffected and will retain their culture.
TLDR: If you like traditional and feminine girls then you have a couple of options. If you like white girls, then learn Russian. If you like latinas, then this is your heyday. If you like Asians, don't worry. And if you like blacks, there's always Africa
The map below is a modified version of that map to show how I think western feminism will spread over the next several years.
Red arrow = spread of feminism
Green arrow = force of resistance
For example, there are millions of Mexican immigrants living in the United States today. I know several Mexican women. Here they are taught to organize around minority rights/incentives, latino advocacy, and feminist teachings - many are drawn to it, though not all. As their numbers, wealth, and influence grow they will spread these beliefs and values across the border into Mexico. I see no resistance.
Hence the red arrow into Mexico with no green arrow pointed back.
As a matter of fact I see only pockets of token resistance in all of Latin America. I expect South America and Mexico to turn pink over the years, especially the more globalized metropolitan populations. I expect the numbers on women's/gender studies programs to increase, and eventually some will turn red on the map (e.g. Brazil). The growing latino population of the United States, the business ties, and media influence of Hollywood, music, magazines, and the Internet will all but insure this.
Globalization is a powerful force. The large red arrows shooting out of the United States represent the spread of feminist and cultural marxist values through globalization.
In Europe, the situation is similar, but there are two important areas of resistance: Russia to the east and Islam to the south. In a bizarre twist of irony, the Iron Curtain protected the economically marxist Soviet Union from the spread of cultural marxism from the west. Two decades later and after the rise of the European Union, the situation is different.
How long can a country such as Poland, virtually surrounded by a sea of red maintain her traditional culture? Poland shares the latin alphabet as well as Roman Catholic religion. A rising standard of living, ease of travel, and further integration into the EU spells a recipe for cultural disaster for Poland. How long until politically fueled grants from Brussels quadruples the amount of women's/gender studies programs. Coupled with globalization, Poland women may soon have the attitude of Czech women, and Czech women the attitude of Germans.
The Baltic states will continue to embrace NATO, the EU, and western institutions to ensure the do not have to fear for their autonomy from Russian domination. Belarus and Ukraine will do the same, although perhaps to a lesser degree. Undoubtedly the common ties of the Orthodox Church and the Cyrillic alphabet system, large Russian populations, and slavic blood ties them more to Russia. Russia will attempt to exert her political will, although it will remain unwanted in all of these states. To what degree will Ukraine and Belarus decline?
Russia will attempt to maintain it's rich culture and extend it's political influence. Hopefully globalization and outside influence will not wear her thin. To the south Islamic countries provide resistance to the spread of feminism, and their immigrants in the future may outbreed and fail to integrate culturally with western European nations, thereby causing cultural and political division.
South Korea may influence Japan, but Japan is a xenophobic country. Although their youth seem disaffected, they are an aging population and therefore not prone to vast cultural shifts such as occurred with American baby boomers. I see resistance from Japan, but influence through western globalization. They will mostly retain their traditional culture.
China as well is an aging population and therefore less exposed to vast cultural shifts, though they are becoming increasingly wealthy and more susceptible to globalization. They have a rich and ancient culture, sufficient language differences, and vast numbers. I see them as turning a darker green on the map. The same applies to SE Asia, although Singapore and the Phillipines will be under more direct western exposure.
India is similar to China, but has millions of Indians in the west, and was once colonized by the British. I do not see this influence as sufficient enough to overcome their vast numbers, and ancient/rich religious and cultural beliefs. Although perhaps because of their western ties they may be more eager to accept negative influences through globalization. I see them as becoming a darker green shade, but mostly unaffected and will retain their culture.
TLDR: If you like traditional and feminine girls then you have a couple of options. If you like white girls, then learn Russian. If you like latinas, then this is your heyday. If you like Asians, don't worry. And if you like blacks, there's always Africa