The philosophy on this board seems to be that so long as you're not horrendously ugly, you can basically be Archer..
I'm torn between believing that and actually thinking that at the end of the day it really does come down to looks. I'm not talking about myself particularly, I'm a little above average and with a little age and weight to me I can push myself right up but I don't club and I'm not really look for casual sex so I'm just talking in general.
You guys say it doesn't matter if you're muscular, you don't need to hit the gym, you can be skinny/slightly chubby and still pull huge numbers with game.
You guys say that facially you just have to be at least pleasant to look at, you don't have to be stunning, that game can counteract all of these defects.
On the one hand I hardly ever really see hot girls with less than hot guys. That girl with the big tits, tiny waist and huge ass is almost always with the guy packing huge guns and pecs visible through his fucking coat.
Then again there are notable exceptions. Take Steve Coogan, for all intents and purpose he could be be Alan Partridge right now, and yet he's not, he's off on drug fuelled sex binges in Hollywood.
So my question is... for the average guy who isn't a Hollywood actor or otherwise very high status, does it really boil down to looks and a bit of game or are girls really that turned on by personality that they will go with a 7/10 with great game over the bland 9/10 dude?
I'm torn between believing that and actually thinking that at the end of the day it really does come down to looks. I'm not talking about myself particularly, I'm a little above average and with a little age and weight to me I can push myself right up but I don't club and I'm not really look for casual sex so I'm just talking in general.
You guys say it doesn't matter if you're muscular, you don't need to hit the gym, you can be skinny/slightly chubby and still pull huge numbers with game.
You guys say that facially you just have to be at least pleasant to look at, you don't have to be stunning, that game can counteract all of these defects.
On the one hand I hardly ever really see hot girls with less than hot guys. That girl with the big tits, tiny waist and huge ass is almost always with the guy packing huge guns and pecs visible through his fucking coat.
Then again there are notable exceptions. Take Steve Coogan, for all intents and purpose he could be be Alan Partridge right now, and yet he's not, he's off on drug fuelled sex binges in Hollywood.
So my question is... for the average guy who isn't a Hollywood actor or otherwise very high status, does it really boil down to looks and a bit of game or are girls really that turned on by personality that they will go with a 7/10 with great game over the bland 9/10 dude?