Quote: (09-02-2012 02:16 PM)pitt Wrote:
90% of the times i completely ignore the face factor. I judge my targets according to their bodies.
That is a point I always wanted to bring up on this Forum. That for black men/urban men the rate of butterfaces (everything looks good but her face) being valued highly is far more than any other culture.
Only in our culture where a woman that looks like this:
can actually receive over 10K per month in contracts (Black Men Magazine, Smooth Magazine, Straight Stunting Magazine), endorsements, hosting parties not to mention the money in gifts she receive from upper echelon black/urban men...just for having a body like this:
Would Maxim, FHM, SI swimsuit, ever feature a model that is unattractive otherwise just because she met the body requirements but not the face?
let me ask you this question, would a white guy who makes 3 Million dollars a year playing professional sports be in a LTR with a women who looked this?
but thats what Defensive End for the Atlanta Ray Edwards, just because she happens to have a big butt, thick thigh, flat stomach combination,
That is because a woman's body is given much more weight in the urban community...so much to the point that a woman could literally be a 4/5 in the face but as long as she has a 9/10 body (which in the urban community is flat stomach, thick thighs, big fat ass) she will be treated like a woman who looks like Halle/Beyonce/(
insert your favorite model here)
What this basically means is that urban men get "conceited shields" from girls who look like Whoopi Goldberg in the face but have 9/10 bodies, and still get it by your normal girls who are 7/8/9's in the face but average bodies.
In white culture a nice body is value on the same level or less than as the face, so you will never see an upper echelon/alpha white guy with a woman who is a 4 in the face but has a nice body. So butterfaces have way less value and know their respective places.