Quote: (07-06-2011 12:07 PM)Theogreat Wrote:
If you say so Athlone SMDH!!! Where do you plan to live with these non- American women? In their country? In the U.S?
I would recommend at least partial expatriation if possible (a realistic option for older black men).
She can be brought to the US as well, but precautions must be taken if you must follow this path.
1. Try to bring her to a city with a ratio that favors you as a man. Atlanta would be a good example of this-even if she did think of straying, she'd have a lot of competition, and you would look better by comparison.
2. Sign a pre-nup and protect yourself legally in every way. Pre-nups should be mandatory for all American/Canadian/British men considering marriage or cohabitation (cohabitation agreements are available too), regardless of where their women come from. Do not marry without one.
Quote: (07-06-2011 12:23 PM)SLIMMACKEY Wrote:
To believe that marrying an "African American"/"Black Woman" is risky is just straight BULLSHIT as a fact, but to each their own as an opinion.
"Bullshit as a fact"?
They divorce at twice the rate of other women in this country. They are renown for their attitude and extravagantly high rates of STD/STI infection, abortion and hypergamy.
If you marry a black American woman as a black man, you have a 66%+ chance of facing a divorce, and she is twice as likely as are women of other races in this country to participate in a divorce. That is a fact.
How on earth is that not risky to you?
Quote:Quote:
I think that statement is str8t overkill.
"str8t fact" is what it is.
Quote:Quote:
My man married to a chica from Panama and she gets an attitude too. These caucasian bitches in America have MAD issues also.
Can you point me to any statement I made contending that there were no white/foreign women on earth with issues/attitudes?
Quote:Quote:
If one wants to state that "American" women are overly shovanistic, materialistic, emotional...ect, then fine. Lets say it is a cultural issue.
Ah, so one can make anthropological generalizations by broader nationality, but it is not ok to do so within the context of different sub-national ethnic groups(ex. African americans, white american, etc)?
This is obviously absurd and inaccurate logic (anthropologists, policy makers, and other respected scholars regularly make such analyses and they can be considered academically valid), but I'd be interested in knowing why you make this distinction in the first place.
You have no problem with all of us sitting around here on this forum and breaking down the different habits of various nationalities/ethnicities of women on a global scale. We'll talk about the differences between Russo-Latvians and ethnic Latvians in Latvia all the time, or the nuances of gaming Scandinavian girls vs. Romanian ones, or Ukrainians and Russians. That's all ok. Sometimes we'll come up with negative conclusions (Argentinian girls = annoyingly difficult, Colombian women = notoriously flaky, Russian women = a little easier for ONS than Ukrainians, Southern Brazil = whiter than northern brazil, girls a little less receptive to darker guys, etc).
But when somebody attempts to create a similar analysis of black American women vs. other female groups?
Preposterous! How dare they!
Quote:Quote:
But to characterize a whole race of women as not marriage worthy is bullshit.
I agree.
Good thing I limited my own analysis to just three percent of the world's black female population without expanding my generalizations to include the other one billion black people on Earth who do not live in America.
Quote:Quote:
This mis-information could lead non Afro Americans to look at Afro American women in a screwed up way and buy into racial and socio-degrading stereotypes depicted from our country. And that is the worst thing ANYBODY can do.
I'm not about to obscure the truth and ignore the obnoxiously overpriced, egotistical, overweight, diseased, and hypergamous elephant in the room for the sake of remaining politically correct.
I don't consider truth telling to be an offense. If you disagree with me, then prove me wrong. I do not care about hurting your feelings.
Quote:Quote:
Especially from another Afro American....I mean this cant be serious.
I am a person of predominantly sub-saharan African descent(more specifically, black West African ancestry) who happens to live in the United States of America.
I am not an African-American.
Quote:Quote:
I will find this especially disturbin if the cat that said it in the first place is black. Because if so, he most likely came from a black woman and that almost look like self hatred.
1. It would be ok for me to say all of this if I were Korean, then?
Note how you have yet to address the strict logical validity of my arguments, and prefer instead to engage in the ad-hominem. That is telling.
2. My mother is not a black American woman. Even if she were, I do not know of any rule which precludes any individual from offering analysis/critiques of others on the basis of their ethnicity (read: blacks are legally free to criticize other blacks, as whites may criticize whites), nor do I know of any logical basis for such critiques to be considered indicative of "self hatred"(especially when they can be shown to be factual).
If you know of such a regulation, then feel free to point it out. I'll wait.
3. Shaming is an indication of weakness, btw. Your use of it here says quite a bit about the strength of your particular position.
Quote:Quote:
Now, can we get back to hard facts and advice on the Brazilian broads??? Nobody ever answered whether or not most speak English? Who has shot at the "uppity" chicas and been shot down and why?? Lets get back on topic my dudes.....
You didn't expect me not to respond, did you?
Come now.
Quote: (07-06-2011 08:53 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:
Well said my brother! If the man honestly thinks marrying a foreign woman would be easier than a black american woman, he is seriously delusional.
Let me ask you a question: what exactly is your revulsion to hard evidence?
I have already presented hard statistical evidence of the very high risk black women present in divorce and the generally lower rates of divorce seen from cross-cultural (read: international) couples.
Do you simply not understand it as it is presented? Shall I simplify it for you? Or perhaps you just do not want to see it, and willfully ignore it?
Delusion is not fact. I have the facts. If you disagree, then refute them as they stand. Ad-hominem attacks citing "self-hatred" and "delusion" won't make you any less wrong.
Quote:Quote:
I know a Canadian-Indian dude who married a girl from India, once she got her papers in Canada she was gone. Too boot she wanted half of his shit, so much for the docile indian image. Same thing happened to a Colombian dude I know who did the same trick. I know another dude who is about to take the plunge with a cuban, he claims she is different. lol My point is women are very different nowadays, marriage is a risky proposition period.
Yes, there goes my argument. You can cite anecdotal evidence of divorces occurring in other cultures you know, so that clearly invalidates any claim one could make of their potentially being cultural differences in divorce/gender dynamics (statistical evidence be damned), right? We're all the same, right?
Right.