[Roosh]

So we have another public rape accusation. This one was levied by an Indian girl against an Indian man. It supposedly happened 9 years ago at UC Berkeley. Here is the article I just dropped on it:

http://www.returnofkings.com/50901/beejo...-questions

Quote:

There is one of two things we can conclude about Beejoli Shah’s account:

1. She was raped and because she failed to report the rape, she allowed a rapist to remain on the loose for nearly a decade. We can only speculate at how many more women were raped because Shah didn’t go to the police and experience a few hours of inconvenience to put a dangerous criminal behind bars.

2. She is lying about her rape. The rape did not occur and is instead a revisionist or implanted memory that surfaced because of America’s current hysteria surrounding rape.

Her Gawker friends have been coming at me hard on Twitter..... to no effect.

[pialo]

This is going to be good.

Nice work Roosh.

[Nostromo]

One additional thing. If she had a rape kit done and tested positive for roofies at a hospital wouldn't that require some sort of investigation and there might be a record of that. I'm not a cali lawyer but it would make sense that police are obligated to investigate at that point just like with domestic violence etc.

[Candlejack]

Didn't she have her feet sucked by Quentin Tarantino? IS that not foot rape?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...viral.html

Quote-It was as an email to 15 friends from a woman wanting to share the 'most insane experience of my life' and 'probably the best story I will ever get to tell'.

But Beejoli Shah has become has become a web sensation after her claims of having her toes sucked by director Quentin Tarantino have gone viral.

The young woman has gone into hiding and her social networking pages have been taken down since her email spread to inboxes across the world.

[Dusty]

Emma Suckatitz needs to be next.

[Dark Knowledge]

(12-16-2014 09:30 PM)Candlejack Wrote:  

Didn't she have her feet sucked by Quentin Tarantino? IS that not foot rape?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...viral.html

Quote-It was as an email to 15 friends from a woman wanting to share the 'most insane experience of my life' and 'probably the best story I will ever get to tell'.

But Beejoli Shah has become has become a web sensation after her claims of having her toes sucked by director Quentin Tarantino have gone viral.

The young woman has gone into hiding and her social networking pages have been taken down since her email spread to inboxes across the world.

WOW! This is the same twat that threw QT under the bus! Amazing

[Matt Forney]

I'll repost the comment I left on Roosh's post because I think it's quite relevant to the discussion:

Speaking from personal experience, Indian girls in the West are absolute nutcases. They manage to retain the worst aspects of Indian culture (sexual prudishness, a princess/daddy's little girl mentality from years of being spoiled by their rich parents) while absorbing the worst aspects of American culture (SJW ideology and feminism and narcissism).

They're not that attractive, either. Indian girls have decent asses, but their butts are always squishy and soft, even when they're young, and they have too much body hair. At least they're not as obese as the general population.

Additionally, virtually all of them are afflicted with a creepy racial inferiority complex. Indian girls hate being Indian, secretly want to be white, yet obsess over the "superiority" of Indian culture (a nation where poor people shit on the streets) as a way to make themselves seem "unique." You think the male IRTs infesting the forum are bad, try dating an Indian chick if you want to experience true pain.

The worst Indian girls are the ones adopted by white couples. I have yet to meet a single one who isn't a complete psycho. One of the nuttiest girls I ever dated was an Indian with white parents: she was a borderline who would provoke me into fights hoping that I would haul off and punch her, because she got off on the drama and the violence. (She was also a squirter. Take that for what you will.)

Beejoli Shah is almost certainly lying about being raped, because she is almost certainly insane. She's not attractive enough to get attention from the white men she lusts after and she despises her co-ethnics for being "creepy" and "sexist." Even if she's telling the truth, the way in which she went about exposing her rapist shows that she's not all right in the head.

[Hotwheels]

(12-16-2014 09:32 PM)Dark Knowledge Wrote:  

(12-16-2014 09:30 PM)Candlejack Wrote:  

Didn't she have her feet sucked by Quentin Tarantino? IS that not foot rape?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...viral.html

Quote-It was as an email to 15 friends from a woman wanting to share the 'most insane experience of my life' and 'probably the best story I will ever get to tell'.

But Beejoli Shah has become has become a web sensation after her claims of having her toes sucked by director Quentin Tarantino have gone viral.

The young woman has gone into hiding and her social networking pages have been taken down since her email spread to inboxes across the world.

WOW! This is the same twat that threw QT under the bus! Amazing

Yes. And the way that Tarantino story came out was calculated all the way. One of the "friends" she emailed the story to sent it to Gawker. She worked at some unknown web promotion outfit at the time, which she was "fired" from. She parlayed that into becoming an editor at Gawker.

Coincidence? I think not.

edit-spelling

[Seamus]

Ha, I remember reading that QT email a while back and being disgusted at what an attention whore the writer was.

Seems like she's up to her old tricks.

[Candlejack]

(12-16-2014 09:47 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

(12-16-2014 09:32 PM)Dark Knowledge Wrote:  

(12-16-2014 09:30 PM)Candlejack Wrote:  

Didn't she have her feet sucked by Quentin Tarantino? IS that not foot rape?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...viral.html

Quote-It was as an email to 15 friends from a woman wanting to share the 'most insane experience of my life' and 'probably the best story I will ever get to tell'.

But Beejoli Shah has become has become a web sensation after her claims of having her toes sucked by director Quentin Tarantino have gone viral.

The young woman has gone into hiding and her social networking pages have been taken down since her email spread to inboxes across the world.

WOW! This is the same twat that threw QT under the bus! Amazing

Yes. And the way that Tarantino story came out was calculated all the way. One of the "friends" she emailed the story to sent it to Gawker. She worked at some unknown web promotion outfit at the time, which she was "fired" from. She paralyed that into becoming an editor at Gawker.

Coincidence? I think not.

Very Machiavellian/Dark Triad.

[TheBulldozer]

delete

[Cobra]

I've never trolled a Twitter account as much as in the past hour. She's fugly. Why a Lacrosse player would fornicate with her forcefully is beyond me.

The girl is a fleeting disgrace to the indian community for one, but the female gender at large as well.

[Onto]

Sounds like she's making up this bullshit to get noticed as a "writer".

[Dark Knowledge]

(12-16-2014 10:58 PM)Onto Wrote:  

Sounds like she's making up this bullshit to get noticed as a "writer".

Probably pals with Lena Dunham

Me-too syndrome.

[El Chinito loco]

Along with Indian-American women being insane attention whores quite a few asian-american women are like this too. They exhibit some of the same issues..low self esteem, massive inferiority complex, and haywire ethnic hamster reasoning. I have noticed some of the more vocal SJWs have been ethnic women of the asian persuasion going crazy like that dorky crazy asian girl who went nuts about Julien Blanc and got kicked off twitter.

This is a case of monkey see monkey do. These girls feel inferior to white girls and the social trend right now is for white girls to play up victimization. They see the attention whore accolades and media attention being showered on this group so the ethnic girls double down with their own rape claims mixed in with cries of racism. It's like a rape "arms race" to see who can get a bigger slice of the victim pie in society.

[TheSlayer]

I want her to get exposed and then sued by the guy who "raped" her. As I said in the Lady Gaga rape thread in 10 years from now all women in the USA/Canada will be survivors of rape and/or domestic abuse. The 1 in 5 stat will become 5 in 5 women are raped.

Here's what I said in the Lady Gaga rape thread:

(12-05-2014 02:25 PM)TheSlayer Wrote:  

I predict in 10 years from now every single woman in the US and Canada will be a rape and/or domestic abuse survivor. We will soon see 5 in 5 women are raped on campus stat becoming the new norm. You know it's coming.

[Dark Knowledge]

(12-16-2014 11:21 PM)TheSlayer Wrote:  

I want her to get exposed and then sued by the guy who "raped" her. As I said in the Lady Gaga rape thread in 10 years from now all women in the USA/Canada will be survivors of rape and/or domestic abuse. The 1 in 5 stat will become 5 in 5 women are raped.

Here's what I said in the Lady Gaga rape thread:

(12-05-2014 02:25 PM)TheSlayer Wrote:  

I predict in 10 years from now every single woman in the US and Canada will be a rape and/or domestic abuse survivor. We will soon see 5 in 5 women are raped on campus stat becoming the new norm. You know it's coming.

"So tell us girls, why is getting raped so "in" this season?"

[The Lizard of Oz]

Here is something worth noting.

In the ROK article and on Twitter, Roosh is making a very simple argument to all these self-proclaimed "survivor" bitches: if you were really raped and did not report it, you are putting other women in danger by letting a rapist walk. So either you are lying, or you are being criminally irresponsible. Roosh even composed a very funny verse to that effect on Twitter which I'll let you discover for yourself. As he remarks, they really have no comeback against this argument.

But it's good to understand why they don't have a comeback. The reason is very simple: this thought never enters their minds. Females don't care about what happens to other people; never have, never will. All they care about is their emotions and desires.

This is most especially true when it comes to the way they act towards men. If a woman likes you, you could be a murderer, rapist, torturer, you could rape her and others, you can do whatever you want; she will protect you, lie for you, cheerfully collude in your crimes, and if she likes you enough, die for you. If she doesn't care for you, you're roadkill, whether you did anything to her or anyone else, or not. The effect of all this on other people never detains her for one moment. Every female knows in her heart of hearts this is true, and will admit it in a moment of frankness.

That is why the very simple argument Roosh is making strikes these females as a kind of revelation to which they have no answer; it involves the reality of other people, something they have never once contemplated since it is not something they care about.

[Roosh]

Quote:

Roosh is making a very simple argument to all these self-proclaimed "survivor" bitches: if you were really raped and did not report it, you are putting other women in danger by letting a rapist walk. So either you are lying, or you are being criminally irresponsible.

It's a classic double bind. Arguments like this have been refined over the past 5+ years in the manosphere. They have been tested through trial and error and are all now ready to go primetime. We have naturally evolved rebuttals for all feminist talking points. And these rebuttals are getting noticed by those bigger than us and will be used in books, newspaper articles, etc. People who would never publicly associate with us will use our arguments to help defeat the enemy, because they are correct, logically sound, and based on truth. This forum and manosphere blogs are accidental weapon factories.

2015 will be a fun year.

[CRR]

   

[Matt Forney]

(12-16-2014 11:37 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

Here is something worth noting.

In the ROK article and on Twitter, Roosh is making a very simple argument to all these self-proclaimed "survivor" bitches: if you were really raped and did not report it, you are putting other women in danger by letting a rapist walk. So either you are lying, or you are being criminally irresponsible. Roosh even composed a very funny verse to that effect on Twitter which I'll let you discover for yourself. As he remarks, they really have no comeback against this argument.

But it's good to understand why they don't have a comeback. The reason is very simple: this thought never enters their minds. Females don't care about what happens to other people; never have, never will. All they care about is their emotions and desires.

This is most especially true when it comes to the way they act towards men. If a woman likes you, you could be a murderer, rapist, torturer, you could rape her and others, you can do whatever you want; she will protect you, lie for you, cheerfully collude in your crimes, and if she likes you enough, die for you. If she doesn't care for you, you're roadkill, whether you did anything to her or anyone else, or not. The effect of all this on other people never detains her for one moment. Every female knows in her heart of hearts this is true, and will admit it in a moment of frankness.

That is why the very simple argument Roosh is making strikes these females as a kind of revelation to which they have no answer; it involves the reality of other people, something they have never once contemplated since it is not something they care about.

This is narcissism in action. Narcissists by definition are incapable of recognizing that other people are autonomous entities with their own desires, feelings and motivations. To a narcissist, everyone else is a tool, at best an extension of themselves, good only for providing narcissistic supply in whatever form it takes (in this case, sympathy).

Beejoli Shah told her story for one reason and one reason only: to get attention and crocodile tears from other women (and some men). She doesn't recognize that she's hurting other women by not reporting her rapist (assuming that she didn't make the story up, and I believe she did) because it doesn't fit her false reality. Either people squirt tears in support of her "trauma" or they don't exist.

We really need to recognize that we're not dealing with complete human beings here. Narcissists, psychopaths and other people with personality disorders are fundamentally broken. They don't have souls. They're as animatronic and predictable as a wind-up toy: just crank their gears and watch them go.

[Hotwheels]

Quote:

Beejoli Shah told her story for one reason and one reason only: to get attention and crocodile tears from other women (and some men).

And the pay for clicks she gets from Buzzfeed.

Not terribly original of her to climb on the UVA story's back.

[dum_dum20]

(12-16-2014 09:44 PM)Matt Forney Wrote:  

I'll repost the comment I left on Roosh's post because I think it's quite relevant to the discussion:

Quite true. You can observe this phenomenon among the upper/ upper middle class Indians in India as well. As a country it's spread over to the extremes. On the one hand you have the traditional conservative societies of the villages / small towns or those in the cities who are still attached to the "roots", where women still follow purdah system - they can't even talk to most elders, and on the other hand you have the modern consumer/media culture fuelled shallow vindictive women who have been brought up in some fantasy land and are basically nightmares. Of course there are some in the middle - mostly from middle, lower middle class families who had to put a lot of effort to get the children educated, so if the children were not total morons they appreciate it and tried to get somewhere in life (as much for there families as for themselves) and thus had little time to be converted into the crazy by television and social media craps.

What you say about the inferiority and other weird complexes is also true, specially with the upper middle / upper classes (I think it's true for parts of that segment of most developing countries - I have noticed in case of Chinese, Persians, Eastern Europeans for example). I visit Indian villages sometimes and it's amazing how much more secure and wholesome the poorest of Indian women - including the ones working with cow dung on the side of the road to make fuel out of it - are compared to many of these educated nutjobs.

[CRR]

I had no idea who she was, googled, and she became 'famous' because of an email about going to a house party where Quentin Tarantino allegedly sucked her toes? She was then fired from her job.

She was also on Jeopardy, described in the daily mail article as 'fame hungry', and an aspiring news anchor in college.

   





Her whole 'fame' is based on being an attention whore.

[TheSlayer]

I didn't want to give Buzzfeed the click but I wanted to read the comments. She's milking the extra "minority" sympathy from the commentators. I see a whole lot of people leaving comments saying how it's difficult for rape survivors from minority communities because of more internal pressures lol. Only one poster called her out saying her story doesn't seem like rape and of course that person got attacked by the horde. This bitch is playing the rape card mixed with the minority angle to win bonus brownie points from the SJWs.