Quote: (08-19-2014 11:19 PM)Vroom Wrote:
I don't even know why everyone is talking about the "average" girl, or why they're surprised that "average" is around 5.
The average of anywhere is 5. If you travel and the girls where you are have a slightly different look to what you're used to, you might think the average there is higher. But stay there for a while, even just a few weeks and it soon becomes normal - classic regression to the mean.
Besides, girls on the lower side of average don't even register with me. I'm not after average, I'm after girls who pass the boner test, of which there is no shortage. I've heard that girls in the eastern states might be of a slightly lower standard, but come to the west coast in the summer time and half you guys wouldn't make it out the airport before jizzing in your pants.
A classic case of Australian male false-positivity.
Let's paint a genetic picture. Australian anglo women are derived from anglo-saxons.
Anglo-saxons are from the british isles which received little or no genetic intermixing for hundreds of years excluding the french.
While places in the EU received a horde of passing immigrants, wars.. continuous conquests, new empires, different genetic specimen, high levels of intermixing..
The British isle remained a solitary world. A cesspool of female genetic hell.
In the 1980s American Hegemony reigned superior with its petrodollaz, the fall of the Soviet Union, Oprah, Jerry Springer, etc etc. They essentially controlled the World's media culture and thus our perceptions of Beauty. What we think is average is based on the American reference of beauty. What we think we desire is based on American capitalism. We relate to an Australian girls looks based on the fictions we see in Hollywood, whether we like it or not (among other influences).
For you to think the world is equal when it comes to genetic beauty is laughable -- but this is what the Anglo-Capitalistic world has taught you. It is not equal.
The requirements for getting a '9/10' sheila is substantially difficult. It is difficult because while most of Europe had a male shortage, genetic intermixing, which produced a high talent pool for beautiful women, the anglo world was stagnant -- there was no evolutionary requirement for females to look good. Female beauty in races depend completely on how much their aesthetics are valued for the purposes of survival. And in the Anglo world it simply was not substantial. For males on the other hand, Australia is a place which breeds fit, masculine, attractive peacockers, with a delusional sense of positive energy.
But Australia is hellish for a decent sex life and intimacy.
All you have left is some slight flirtations and dreams with scoring a cutesy girl next door type like Miranda Kerr who hasn't been on the cock carousel in Fortitude Valley.
But I assure you, they have all been.
It's simply too easy for a woman to find a bull-neck Rugby/AFL Player -- a male that's willing to go down a few deviations just to get a notch and brag to his mates over a 10 dollar cappuccino in Lygon street. Most Australian women have experienced a man far beyond her social value, and if she hasn't, it's probably because she got traumatized by Schoolies Groupsex after necking a bottle of smirnoff, brah.