rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Iran/kish Island datasheet
#26

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-09-2012 08:29 AM)Hooligan Harry Wrote:  

You know Iran is a place I would love to go to. I love Persian women and Iran is a history nerds wet dream.

The problem I have with this report is that I am not sure how credible it is. Misterstirs "notches" have turned up on Russian dating sites, of which the second one is on 18 different sites

http://www.tineye.com/search/1282129e412...7f87da2c3/
http://www.tineye.com/search/1c434682eca...a217819af/

Bit of an iffy location to be sending people on a wild goose chase.

Hoping there is a reasonable explanation for this?



Where is the data in this "datasheet", sounds mostly like a lot of speculation.

Good luck gaming in a country where alcohol is illegal, there is no nightlife, there is a secret and religious police watching everyones social interactions, etc.

Also I'd estimate that only 10-15% of the population can speak conversational English.
Reply
#27

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-09-2012 11:11 PM)OGNorCal707 Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 08:29 AM)Hooligan Harry Wrote:  

You know Iran is a place I would love to go to. I love Persian women and Iran is a history nerds wet dream.

The problem I have with this report is that I am not sure how credible it is. Misterstirs "notches" have turned up on Russian dating sites, of which the second one is on 18 different sites

http://www.tineye.com/search/1282129e412...7f87da2c3/
http://www.tineye.com/search/1c434682eca...a217819af/

Bit of an iffy location to be sending people on a wild goose chase.

Hoping there is a reasonable explanation for this?



Where is the data in this "datasheet", sounds mostly like a lot of speculation.

Good luck gaming in a country where alcohol is illegal, there is no nightlife, there is a secret and religious police watching everyones social interactions, etc.

Also I'd estimate that only 10-15% of the population can speak conversational English.
I've seen those pics before on Badoo and I think some African scammer from craigslist sent me one. The one on the desk I've seen numerous times.
Reply
#28

Iran/kish Island datasheet

As half-Persian, I am well aware of Kish Island. Sure, its easygoing compared to the rest of Iran but its hardly the Vegas of Iran as described in this thread. Probably the best article you can find would be here: http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/articl...40326.html

As for gaming in Iran, its mostly based on social circle, even family circle. Alcohol, girls, and drugs are all available however I would not want to disclose locations randomly (I assure you, its not Kish Island). Basically you can't expect to roll into ISLAMIC republic of Iran and expect some "friendly Iranian dude" to hook you up with the spots, parties....because they are very literally putting their ass on the line. Even when my "connected" extended family members offered for the hookups, I declined, because I rather not end up like this guy: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/world/...s-spy.html

Best place to meet Persian women in the ME? Dubai. It's not easy there either, but you guys can make it happen [Image: wink.gif]
Reply
#29

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-09-2012 08:47 PM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 03:29 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 06:41 AM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 05:25 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

I just quick searched, and there are more Iranian girls in my side of toronto than montreal by 3 =) I knew they were a lot of them here. Seriously though, I wouldn't worry about being wiped 100 times, its easy to get around those rules

@Wizard, USA always gives a warning before they invade, its not like Iran can really defend itself against US in the long term, and I'd expect to see a long term bombing campaign so one could easily leave Iran if war broke out unless of course Iran feels suicidal and sneak attacks America, even if they did it'd take 72 hours for US to get it troops in full bomb mode. No different than Libya or Iraq, tonnes of Americans fled in the first few days of war.

The United States will never "invade" Iran, the country is 3x the size of Iraq and the only reason they would ever do it is if Iran literally nuked Israel. Also Iran has connections to terrorist cells all across the middle east, those cells are not going to sit back, and do nothing.

Also it's not going to be 72hrs, the United States has the 5th fleet there and I guarantee you they can have bombers in the air in minutes. The United States also has no embassy in Iran, and to be honest it's not really a major vacation spot.

The Iranians already showed there willing to take hostages, and since the only chance they have to stave off a massive bombing campaign would be to take hostages.

72hr window.. that is just insane.

If someone wants to head to Iran, and get some of that great looking Persian ass then more power to them, but be honest about the danger.

Giving bad advice on this could get someone killed.
I see your point. America COULD do a sneak attack/bombing campaign and there is no American embassy in Iran. But I think they'd want to get their allies like France embassy and their own people at least 72 hours to get out of dodge. They gave Gaddafi multiple warnings and a timeline publicly, they did the same to Iraq and Afghanistan and every other country they basically invade. I don't consider this bad advice because America does not sneak attack countries. They usually try to co-ordinate with allies publicly, give an ultimatum, that is when you want to be leaving.

Of course Iran is dangerous if war was declared, I hope I do not come across as it being not dangerous. Even if US 5th fleet is right there, I think Iran does have a real navy and real surface to air missiles that are going to need to be knocked out before they actually launch a real invasion/bombardment campaign. Anyhow the world works in strange ways and what we are told publicly is not what happens in reality. One would think if any African country would be invaded it'd be Somalia (pirates+terrorist attacks) or Sudan (genocide in darfur+to help southern christians+ international arrest warrant for leader for genocide) but guess who got bombed, a country on friendly terms with the US (Libya) who just was visited by the secretary of state only a few years earlier. Or look at 9/11, 90% saudi hijackers, and we invade afghanistan. These things are hard to predict because we are never given all of the information. We invade Grenada but leave alone Cuba, go figures.


anyways this is starting to go off topic, it should be sufficient to say Iran can turn dangerous quickly if an invasion occurs.

If this were some obscure event that happened in the past then fine, I wouldn't be all over it, but it's not. Someone could literally get killed for following such piss poor advice.

The United States would not wait 3 days to give the Iranian government time to activate assets in the Middle East, nor should people simply think they would be allowed to run away. Europeans, and countries with better relations might have that option but America is uniquely hated by the Iranian government.

Now being thrown in jail and used as a human shield is a pretty damn good option. Right now Iran is suffering a lot of economic turmoil due to recently imposed sanctions, and this is only going to get worse over the next few months.

Please people don't let wishful thinking, and retarded assumptions lead yourself to try and pretend that going to Iran wouldn't be a major risk at the moment.

Remember how it was pointed out that the media likes to fear monger us from travelling anywhere. If you listen to the tv, you'd never leave your house and could come up with a reason not to go anywhere. There probably isn't even going to be a war, its just saber rattling. I bet you $5 no war in the next year and if there is a war I bet you another $5 that Iran gets a 72 hour warning. USA is not going to sneak attack Iran, this is damaging internationally and illegal and given that the Americans can easily win they have nothing to gain by sneak attack. In fact it is the opposite. By giving 72 hours they give the iranian regime a chance to flee the country/step aside so invasion is not necessary.

Even if you were stuck in Iran, Iranians would not go American hunting as they'd be more concern with saving themselves. also while they might try to use tourist hotels as human shields to protect high important things like Saddam did in the 1990s
Reply
#30

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-10-2012 01:43 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 08:47 PM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 03:29 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 06:41 AM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 05:25 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

I just quick searched, and there are more Iranian girls in my side of toronto than montreal by 3 =) I knew they were a lot of them here. Seriously though, I wouldn't worry about being wiped 100 times, its easy to get around those rules

@Wizard, USA always gives a warning before they invade, its not like Iran can really defend itself against US in the long term, and I'd expect to see a long term bombing campaign so one could easily leave Iran if war broke out unless of course Iran feels suicidal and sneak attacks America, even if they did it'd take 72 hours for US to get it troops in full bomb mode. No different than Libya or Iraq, tonnes of Americans fled in the first few days of war.

The United States will never "invade" Iran, the country is 3x the size of Iraq and the only reason they would ever do it is if Iran literally nuked Israel. Also Iran has connections to terrorist cells all across the middle east, those cells are not going to sit back, and do nothing.

Also it's not going to be 72hrs, the United States has the 5th fleet there and I guarantee you they can have bombers in the air in minutes. The United States also has no embassy in Iran, and to be honest it's not really a major vacation spot.

The Iranians already showed there willing to take hostages, and since the only chance they have to stave off a massive bombing campaign would be to take hostages.

72hr window.. that is just insane.

If someone wants to head to Iran, and get some of that great looking Persian ass then more power to them, but be honest about the danger.

Giving bad advice on this could get someone killed.
I see your point. America COULD do a sneak attack/bombing campaign and there is no American embassy in Iran. But I think they'd want to get their allies like France embassy and their own people at least 72 hours to get out of dodge. They gave Gaddafi multiple warnings and a timeline publicly, they did the same to Iraq and Afghanistan and every other country they basically invade. I don't consider this bad advice because America does not sneak attack countries. They usually try to co-ordinate with allies publicly, give an ultimatum, that is when you want to be leaving.

Of course Iran is dangerous if war was declared, I hope I do not come across as it being not dangerous. Even if US 5th fleet is right there, I think Iran does have a real navy and real surface to air missiles that are going to need to be knocked out before they actually launch a real invasion/bombardment campaign. Anyhow the world works in strange ways and what we are told publicly is not what happens in reality. One would think if any African country would be invaded it'd be Somalia (pirates+terrorist attacks) or Sudan (genocide in darfur+to help southern christians+ international arrest warrant for leader for genocide) but guess who got bombed, a country on friendly terms with the US (Libya) who just was visited by the secretary of state only a few years earlier. Or look at 9/11, 90% saudi hijackers, and we invade afghanistan. These things are hard to predict because we are never given all of the information. We invade Grenada but leave alone Cuba, go figures.


anyways this is starting to go off topic, it should be sufficient to say Iran can turn dangerous quickly if an invasion occurs.

If this were some obscure event that happened in the past then fine, I wouldn't be all over it, but it's not. Someone could literally get killed for following such piss poor advice.

The United States would not wait 3 days to give the Iranian government time to activate assets in the Middle East, nor should people simply think they would be allowed to run away. Europeans, and countries with better relations might have that option but America is uniquely hated by the Iranian government.

Now being thrown in jail and used as a human shield is a pretty damn good option. Right now Iran is suffering a lot of economic turmoil due to recently imposed sanctions, and this is only going to get worse over the next few months.

Please people don't let wishful thinking, and retarded assumptions lead yourself to try and pretend that going to Iran wouldn't be a major risk at the moment.

Remember how it was pointed out that the media likes to fear monger us from travelling anywhere. If you listen to the tv, you'd never leave your house and could come up with a reason not to go anywhere. There probably isn't even going to be a war, its just saber rattling. I bet you $5 no war in the next year and if there is a war I bet you another $5 that Iran gets a 72 hour warning. USA is not going to sneak attack Iran, this is damaging internationally and illegal and given that the Americans can easily win they have nothing to gain by sneak attack. In fact it is the opposite. By giving 72 hours they give the iranian regime a chance to flee the country/step aside so invasion is not necessary.

Even if you were stuck in Iran, Iranians would not go American hunting as they'd be more concern with saving themselves. also while they might try to use tourist hotels as human shields to protect high important things like Saddam did in the 1990s

Fear mongering doesn't erase 30 years of international tension, there is a difference between believing over exaggerated media reports, and using common sense.

Saber rattling is something they've been doing for the past ten years, what is going on now is that finally the economic sanctions recently imposed are playing hell with the Iranian currency. It's driving the cost of everything up, and that means the local population is becoming more disgruntled. The Iranian leaders have just spent the last few months watching autocrats, and revolution spread throughout the Middle East. You think there so dumb as to not think it could happen in their country?

Did you forget the protests that happened after the last elections? Well the Iranians are having new elections in March and nothing say's pissed off like the economy being run into the ground.

As for the legality if it, are you kidding me? Any nation at any time in history can justify war however the fuck it pleases. Also most of the Middle East would happily watch the United States bomb the shit out of Iran. Do you think there really keen on Iran getting a nuclear bomb?

As for the 72hr warning, what possible reason could the United States have to announce they're coming in 3 days? So they can allow Iran time to arm their defenses, maybe contact Hezbollah?

Also the Iranian regime isn't going to run, why in god's name would they? The United States is not launching a land invasion, it's simply not going to happen.

Also why in god's name would the Iranian government not go American hunting, try this formula.

Hostages + Threats to kill hostages= Pressure America to back down

or they could just call the hostages spies and be done with it.

Your ignorance of the situation and country is frankly appalling and dangerous. You don't trust American media, there are plenty of other foreign papers, try the BBC or Al-Jazeera.

The Iranian government right now is coming under more, and more pressure and there is a big chance that when the elections come there could be some sort of uprising. You really want to visit Iran, wait till the current regime has fallen, or the moderates have been sworn into office.

There are dangerous places in the world, and blind ass optimism won't protect you from the realities of the world.

Your best? Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen! -John Mason (The Rock)
Reply
#31

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-10-2012 12:25 AM)BostonBMW Wrote:  

As half-Persian, I am well aware of Kish Island. Sure, its easygoing compared to the rest of Iran but its hardly the Vegas of Iran as described in this thread. Probably the best article you can find would be here: http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/articl...40326.html

As for gaming in Iran, its mostly based on social circle, even family circle. Alcohol, girls, and drugs are all available however I would not want to disclose locations randomly (I assure you, its not Kish Island). Basically you can't expect to roll into ISLAMIC republic of Iran and expect some "friendly Iranian dude" to hook you up with the spots, parties....because they are very literally putting their ass on the line. Even when my "connected" extended family members offered for the hookups, I declined, because I rather not end up like this guy: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/world/...s-spy.html

Best place to meet Persian women in the ME? Dubai. It's not easy there either, but you guys can make it happen [Image: wink.gif]
I never meant to describe it as Vegas and hope no one got that idea. I already showed why the Islamic banner is just hogwash. Yeah Islamic country where alcohol, is widespread, where temporary marriage to hundreds of women simultaneously is possible but is just an excuse to sleep around, 1 in 4 are drug users and 1 in 17 outright addicts, 1 in 4 getting abortions, hymen reconstruction is the top surgical procedure, prostitution widespread, and the chief of police is caught with 6 naked hookers in the most religious city in the country. All of this with independent sources/links. SURE.

Yeah I am sure the US has no spies in Iran. Those hikers really couldn't find anywhere in the US or the western hemisphere or any other place in the world where America's enemies aren't besides the Iran-Iraq border. Yeah, right [Image: dodgy.gif]

The probability that he is a spy sure exist. He is former military and he is from Iran so he would "blend in" basically the kind of person who would be sent as a spy. Also Hezbollah announced a few months ago that they did uncover 12 US spies from Iran to Syria to their own ranks.
http://gma.yahoo.com/exclusive-cia-spies...19159.html
Further US does not deny that they are spies

Quote:Quote:

In a significant failure for the United States in the Mideast, more than a dozen spies working for the CIA in Iran and Lebanon have been caught and the U.S. government fears they will be or have been executed, according to four current and former U.S. officials with connections to the intelligence community.
The spies were paid informants recruited by the CIA for two distinct espionage rings targeting Iran and the Beirut-based Hezbollah organization, considered by the U.S. to be a terror group backed by Iran.

“Espionage is a risky business,” a U.S. official briefed on the developments told ABC News, confirming the loss of the unspecified number of spies over the last six months.
AND

Quote:Quote:

Reporting from Beirut — Iran declared Saturday that it had uncovered and dismantled what it called a U.S. "espionage and sabotage network" and arrested 30 people allegedly spying for the CIA.

Tehran claimed that it also had identified and exposed 42 others in connection with the suspected U.S. spy network, according to a widely disseminated statement by the Ministry of Intelligence and Security.
The timelines match up perfectly, the US media is not reporting that this "marine" is most likely tied to the same spy ring that was busted in August. America spies on Iran, Iran spies on America, heck Israel spies on America. If the claims of an imminent us invasion of iran are true as other posters claim then that place must be crawling with spies and cia.


http://articles.latimes.com/2011/may/22/...e-20110522
Reply
#32

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-10-2012 02:03 AM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-10-2012 01:43 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 08:47 PM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 03:29 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 06:41 AM)Wizard Wrote:  

The United States will never "invade" Iran, the country is 3x the size of Iraq and the only reason they would ever do it is if Iran literally nuked Israel. Also Iran has connections to terrorist cells all across the middle east, those cells are not going to sit back, and do nothing.

Also it's not going to be 72hrs, the United States has the 5th fleet there and I guarantee you they can have bombers in the air in minutes. The United States also has no embassy in Iran, and to be honest it's not really a major vacation spot.

The Iranians already showed there willing to take hostages, and since the only chance they have to stave off a massive bombing campaign would be to take hostages.

72hr window.. that is just insane.

If someone wants to head to Iran, and get some of that great looking Persian ass then more power to them, but be honest about the danger.

Giving bad advice on this could get someone killed.
I see your point. America COULD do a sneak attack/bombing campaign and there is no American embassy in Iran. But I think they'd want to get their allies like France embassy and their own people at least 72 hours to get out of dodge. They gave Gaddafi multiple warnings and a timeline publicly, they did the same to Iraq and Afghanistan and every other country they basically invade. I don't consider this bad advice because America does not sneak attack countries. They usually try to co-ordinate with allies publicly, give an ultimatum, that is when you want to be leaving.

Of course Iran is dangerous if war was declared, I hope I do not come across as it being not dangerous. Even if US 5th fleet is right there, I think Iran does have a real navy and real surface to air missiles that are going to need to be knocked out before they actually launch a real invasion/bombardment campaign. Anyhow the world works in strange ways and what we are told publicly is not what happens in reality. One would think if any African country would be invaded it'd be Somalia (pirates+terrorist attacks) or Sudan (genocide in darfur+to help southern christians+ international arrest warrant for leader for genocide) but guess who got bombed, a country on friendly terms with the US (Libya) who just was visited by the secretary of state only a few years earlier. Or look at 9/11, 90% saudi hijackers, and we invade afghanistan. These things are hard to predict because we are never given all of the information. We invade Grenada but leave alone Cuba, go figures.


anyways this is starting to go off topic, it should be sufficient to say Iran can turn dangerous quickly if an invasion occurs.

If this were some obscure event that happened in the past then fine, I wouldn't be all over it, but it's not. Someone could literally get killed for following such piss poor advice.

The United States would not wait 3 days to give the Iranian government time to activate assets in the Middle East, nor should people simply think they would be allowed to run away. Europeans, and countries with better relations might have that option but America is uniquely hated by the Iranian government.

Now being thrown in jail and used as a human shield is a pretty damn good option. Right now Iran is suffering a lot of economic turmoil due to recently imposed sanctions, and this is only going to get worse over the next few months.

Please people don't let wishful thinking, and retarded assumptions lead yourself to try and pretend that going to Iran wouldn't be a major risk at the moment.

Remember how it was pointed out that the media likes to fear monger us from travelling anywhere. If you listen to the tv, you'd never leave your house and could come up with a reason not to go anywhere. There probably isn't even going to be a war, its just saber rattling. I bet you $5 no war in the next year and if there is a war I bet you another $5 that Iran gets a 72 hour warning. USA is not going to sneak attack Iran, this is damaging internationally and illegal and given that the Americans can easily win they have nothing to gain by sneak attack. In fact it is the opposite. By giving 72 hours they give the iranian regime a chance to flee the country/step aside so invasion is not necessary.

Even if you were stuck in Iran, Iranians would not go American hunting as they'd be more concern with saving themselves. also while they might try to use tourist hotels as human shields to protect high important things like Saddam did in the 1990s

Fear mongering doesn't erase 30 years of international tension, there is a difference between believing over exaggerated media reports, and using common sense.

Saber rattling is something they've been doing for the past ten years, what is going on now is that finally the economic sanctions recently imposed are playing hell with the Iranian currency. It's driving the cost of everything up, and that means the local population is becoming more disgruntled. The Iranian leaders have just spent the last few months watching autocrats, and revolution spread throughout the Middle East. You think there so dumb as to not think it could happen in their country?

Did you forget the protests that happened after the last elections? Well the Iranians are having new elections in March and nothing say's pissed off like the economy being run into the ground.

As for the legality if it, are you kidding me? Any nation at any time in history can justify war however the fuck it pleases. Also most of the Middle East would happily watch the United States bomb the shit out of Iran. Do you think there really keen on Iran getting a nuclear bomb?

As for the 72hr warning, what possible reason could the United States have to announce they're coming in 3 days? So they can allow Iran time to arm their defenses, maybe contact Hezbollah?

Also the Iranian regime isn't going to run, why in god's name would they? The United States is not launching a land invasion, it's simply not going to happen.

Also why in god's name would the Iranian government not go American hunting, try this formula.

Hostages + Threats to kill hostages= Pressure America to back down

or they could just call the hostages spies and be done with it.

Your ignorance of the situation and country is frankly appalling and dangerous. You don't trust American media, there are plenty of other foreign papers, try the BBC or Al-Jazeera.

The Iranian government right now is coming under more, and more pressure and there is a big chance that when the elections come there could be some sort of uprising. You really want to visit Iran, wait till the current regime has fallen, or the moderates have been sworn into office.

There are dangerous places in the world, and blind ass optimism won't protect you from the realities of the world.

You have some valid points. The Iranian people tried to rise up and their rising wash quelled. Iran is a real democracy unlike Libya,Egypt or the other countries which had sham democracies with 1 name on the ballot. Ahamadinejad can lose elections unlike in Bahrain where there are none or in egypt were they are rigged. Hence the need for a mass uprising is not necessary like in other countries that have no democracy.

US always gives ultimatums and warnings before invasions. Iran really will have no defence against America. I believe it is part of some type of international treaty on convention of warfare that you must give a warning to the other country and

"The Hague Convention (III) in 1907 called "CONVENTION RELATIVE TO THE OPENING OF HOSTILITIES"[16] gives the international actions a country should perform when opening hostilities. The first two Articles say:-
Article 1
The Contracting Powers recognize that hostilities between themselves must not commence without previous and explicit warning, in the form either of a reasoned declaration of war or of an ultimatum with conditional declaration of war."

The Iranians would be more concerned with things than trying to hunt down the few americans who could get visas into iran. It would be a waste of resources.

Why would I trust British media, they lied about Iraq just as much as America media. Why would I trust Al Jazeera, a newspaper run and owned by the dictator of Qatar, one of US allies who invaded libya and is facilitating al qaeda and the afghan taliban to open an office in his country? Google it is all true.

If the Iranian are invaded or the regime is replaced it will not be by "moderates" Ahmadinejad is secular he is not a religious extremist (he is extreme in other ways albeit). Your going to get a Iraq/Libya no go zone country.

Anyways lets end this political discussion and talk about game in kish island. You made your point and the beta males will stay away; people can judge for themselves if persian pussy is worth the risk.
Reply
#33

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-10-2012 12:25 AM)BostonBMW Wrote:  

Basically you can't expect to roll into ISLAMIC republic of Iran and expect some "friendly Iranian dude" to hook you up with the spots, parties....because they are very literally putting their ass on the line. Even when my "connected" extended family members offered for the hookups, I declined, because I rather not end up like this guy: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/world/...s-spy.html

The situation in Iran is full of contradictions it seems... if you look up chicks from Iran on Badoo, you'll see profiles stating that the person is a lesbian, is living in an open relationship or wants to drink a bottle of champaign with a guy tonight etc.... apparently they don't seem to fear any legal consequences...on the other hand, you do hear ugly storries in the media of foreign businessmen ending up in prison for minor things e.g. holding hands with a Persian woman etc...
Reply
#34

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-09-2012 11:07 PM)Dash Global Wrote:  

im looking on youtube at kish island and it looks like a ghost town....

A few years ago the Persian service of the BBC produced a documentary whose last parts are about Kish island... here's the link if anyone's interested.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLWEnrBV8...re=related

Well, personnally if I were going to visit Iran I think I wouldn't even consider Kish island. It's presumably one of the least interesting place to see in the country compared to other towns where there's a lot of history and culture and as pointed out earlier by several posters you can meet Iranian women outside of Iran anyways.
Reply
#35

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-10-2012 03:56 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-10-2012 02:03 AM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-10-2012 01:43 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 08:47 PM)Wizard Wrote:  

Quote: (01-09-2012 03:29 PM)misterstir Wrote:  

I see your point. America COULD do a sneak attack/bombing campaign and there is no American embassy in Iran. But I think they'd want to get their allies like France embassy and their own people at least 72 hours to get out of dodge. They gave Gaddafi multiple warnings and a timeline publicly, they did the same to Iraq and Afghanistan and every other country they basically invade. I don't consider this bad advice because America does not sneak attack countries. They usually try to co-ordinate with allies publicly, give an ultimatum, that is when you want to be leaving.

Of course Iran is dangerous if war was declared, I hope I do not come across as it being not dangerous. Even if US 5th fleet is right there, I think Iran does have a real navy and real surface to air missiles that are going to need to be knocked out before they actually launch a real invasion/bombardment campaign. Anyhow the world works in strange ways and what we are told publicly is not what happens in reality. One would think if any African country would be invaded it'd be Somalia (pirates+terrorist attacks) or Sudan (genocide in darfur+to help southern christians+ international arrest warrant for leader for genocide) but guess who got bombed, a country on friendly terms with the US (Libya) who just was visited by the secretary of state only a few years earlier. Or look at 9/11, 90% saudi hijackers, and we invade afghanistan. These things are hard to predict because we are never given all of the information. We invade Grenada but leave alone Cuba, go figures.


anyways this is starting to go off topic, it should be sufficient to say Iran can turn dangerous quickly if an invasion occurs.

If this were some obscure event that happened in the past then fine, I wouldn't be all over it, but it's not. Someone could literally get killed for following such piss poor advice.

The United States would not wait 3 days to give the Iranian government time to activate assets in the Middle East, nor should people simply think they would be allowed to run away. Europeans, and countries with better relations might have that option but America is uniquely hated by the Iranian government.

Now being thrown in jail and used as a human shield is a pretty damn good option. Right now Iran is suffering a lot of economic turmoil due to recently imposed sanctions, and this is only going to get worse over the next few months.

Please people don't let wishful thinking, and retarded assumptions lead yourself to try and pretend that going to Iran wouldn't be a major risk at the moment.

Remember how it was pointed out that the media likes to fear monger us from travelling anywhere. If you listen to the tv, you'd never leave your house and could come up with a reason not to go anywhere. There probably isn't even going to be a war, its just saber rattling. I bet you $5 no war in the next year and if there is a war I bet you another $5 that Iran gets a 72 hour warning. USA is not going to sneak attack Iran, this is damaging internationally and illegal and given that the Americans can easily win they have nothing to gain by sneak attack. In fact it is the opposite. By giving 72 hours they give the iranian regime a chance to flee the country/step aside so invasion is not necessary.

Even if you were stuck in Iran, Iranians would not go American hunting as they'd be more concern with saving themselves. also while they might try to use tourist hotels as human shields to protect high important things like Saddam did in the 1990s

Fear mongering doesn't erase 30 years of international tension, there is a difference between believing over exaggerated media reports, and using common sense.

Saber rattling is something they've been doing for the past ten years, what is going on now is that finally the economic sanctions recently imposed are playing hell with the Iranian currency. It's driving the cost of everything up, and that means the local population is becoming more disgruntled. The Iranian leaders have just spent the last few months watching autocrats, and revolution spread throughout the Middle East. You think there so dumb as to not think it could happen in their country?

Did you forget the protests that happened after the last elections? Well the Iranians are having new elections in March and nothing say's pissed off like the economy being run into the ground.

As for the legality if it, are you kidding me? Any nation at any time in history can justify war however the fuck it pleases. Also most of the Middle East would happily watch the United States bomb the shit out of Iran. Do you think there really keen on Iran getting a nuclear bomb?

As for the 72hr warning, what possible reason could the United States have to announce they're coming in 3 days? So they can allow Iran time to arm their defenses, maybe contact Hezbollah?

Also the Iranian regime isn't going to run, why in god's name would they? The United States is not launching a land invasion, it's simply not going to happen.

Also why in god's name would the Iranian government not go American hunting, try this formula.

Hostages + Threats to kill hostages= Pressure America to back down

or they could just call the hostages spies and be done with it.

Your ignorance of the situation and country is frankly appalling and dangerous. You don't trust American media, there are plenty of other foreign papers, try the BBC or Al-Jazeera.

The Iranian government right now is coming under more, and more pressure and there is a big chance that when the elections come there could be some sort of uprising. You really want to visit Iran, wait till the current regime has fallen, or the moderates have been sworn into office.

There are dangerous places in the world, and blind ass optimism won't protect you from the realities of the world.

You have some valid points. The Iranian people tried to rise up and their rising wash quelled. Iran is a real democracy unlike Libya,Egypt or the other countries which had sham democracies with 1 name on the ballot. Ahamadinejad can lose elections unlike in Bahrain where there are none or in egypt were they are rigged. Hence the need for a mass uprising is not necessary like in other countries that have no democracy.

US always gives ultimatums and warnings before invasions. Iran really will have no defence against America. I believe it is part of some type of international treaty on convention of warfare that you must give a warning to the other country and

"The Hague Convention (III) in 1907 called "CONVENTION RELATIVE TO THE OPENING OF HOSTILITIES"[16] gives the international actions a country should perform when opening hostilities. The first two Articles say:-
Article 1
The Contracting Powers recognize that hostilities between themselves must not commence without previous and explicit warning, in the form either of a reasoned declaration of war or of an ultimatum with conditional declaration of war."

The Iranians would be more concerned with things than trying to hunt down the few americans who could get visas into iran. It would be a waste of resources.

Why would I trust British media, they lied about Iraq just as much as America media. Why would I trust Al Jazeera, a newspaper run and owned by the dictator of Qatar, one of US allies who invaded libya and is facilitating al qaeda and the afghan taliban to open an office in his country? Google it is all true.

If the Iranian are invaded or the regime is replaced it will not be by "moderates" Ahmadinejad is secular he is not a religious extremist (he is extreme in other ways albeit). Your going to get a Iraq/Libya no go zone country.

Anyways lets end this political discussion and talk about game in kish island. You made your point and the beta males will stay away; people can judge for themselves if persian pussy is worth the risk.

Iran is a real democracy about as much as the Trix rabbit is a real person. Real democracies don't violently crush protests, have armed militias roaming around, or be run by a supreme religious authority. Iran is a theocracy run by the Ayatollah.

Also the last time the United States had an official declaration of war was in WW2, nation states in this modern age don't declare war, they declare "actions" or whatever colorful language they can conjure up.

Your blanket condemnation of all media outlets is without merit, and is too general to be of any use. I'm going to drop this thread, but leave it with a warning.

It's not a matter of beta/alpha, or any of that crap. No man should so casually ignore common sense because there so insecure about their masculinity, or are thinking with their dick. Iran is a country run by a hardline government, but with a great people.

The issue isn't with the Iranian people themselves, but with a powerful government who see's the potential to lose power. Even on a place designed to be tourist friendly, your still running the risk of being in the crossfire between to major powers. Also if you think that your passport or supposed "human" rights will protect you, then do the world a favor and never reproduce.

I believe I've made my point, or at least hopefully planted the idea in someone's head whose considering a trip to Iran.

Your best? Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and fuck the prom queen! -John Mason (The Rock)
Reply
#36

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-10-2012 03:28 AM)misterstir Wrote:  

Quote: (01-10-2012 12:25 AM)BostonBMW Wrote:  

As half-Persian, I am well aware of Kish Island. Sure, its easygoing compared to the rest of Iran but its hardly the Vegas of Iran as described in this thread. Probably the best article you can find would be here: http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/articl...40326.html

As for gaming in Iran, its mostly based on social circle, even family circle. Alcohol, girls, and drugs are all available however I would not want to disclose locations randomly (I assure you, its not Kish Island). Basically you can't expect to roll into ISLAMIC republic of Iran and expect some "friendly Iranian dude" to hook you up with the spots, parties....because they are very literally putting their ass on the line. Even when my "connected" extended family members offered for the hookups, I declined, because I rather not end up like this guy: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/world/...s-spy.html

Best place to meet Persian women in the ME? Dubai. It's not easy there either, but you guys can make it happen [Image: wink.gif]
I never meant to describe it as Vegas and hope no one got that idea. I already showed why the Islamic banner is just hogwash. Yeah Islamic country where alcohol, is widespread, where temporary marriage to hundreds of women simultaneously is possible but is just an excuse to sleep around, 1 in 4 are drug users and 1 in 17 outright addicts, 1 in 4 getting abortions, hymen reconstruction is the top surgical procedure, prostitution widespread, and the chief of police is caught with 6 naked hookers in the most religious city in the country. All of this with independent sources/links. SURE.

Yeah I am sure the US has no spies in Iran. Those hikers really couldn't find anywhere in the US or the western hemisphere or any other place in the world where America's enemies aren't besides the Iran-Iraq border. Yeah, right [Image: dodgy.gif]

The probability that he is a spy sure exist. He is former military and he is from Iran so he would "blend in" basically the kind of person who would be sent as a spy. Also Hezbollah announced a few months ago that they did uncover 12 US spies from Iran to Syria to their own ranks.
http://gma.yahoo.com/exclusive-cia-spies...19159.html
Further US does not deny that they are spies

Quote:Quote:

In a significant failure for the United States in the Mideast, more than a dozen spies working for the CIA in Iran and Lebanon have been caught and the U.S. government fears they will be or have been executed, according to four current and former U.S. officials with connections to the intelligence community.
The spies were paid informants recruited by the CIA for two distinct espionage rings targeting Iran and the Beirut-based Hezbollah organization, considered by the U.S. to be a terror group backed by Iran.

“Espionage is a risky business,” a U.S. official briefed on the developments told ABC News, confirming the loss of the unspecified number of spies over the last six months.
AND

Quote:Quote:

Reporting from Beirut — Iran declared Saturday that it had uncovered and dismantled what it called a U.S. "espionage and sabotage network" and arrested 30 people allegedly spying for the CIA.

Tehran claimed that it also had identified and exposed 42 others in connection with the suspected U.S. spy network, according to a widely disseminated statement by the Ministry of Intelligence and Security.
The timelines match up perfectly, the US media is not reporting that this "marine" is most likely tied to the same spy ring that was busted in August. America spies on Iran, Iran spies on America, heck Israel spies on America. If the claims of an imminent us invasion of iran are true as other posters claim then that place must be crawling with spies and cia.


http://articles.latimes.com/2011/may/22/...e-20110522

I am not sure why the fixation on whether he is a spy or not. I just wanted to point out the risks that Americans of Persian descent face when visiting family. I would not want to take on the possibility of being caught at some underground party. Maybe a friend of a cousin whose dtf, sure.

Officially the country is Islamic meaning that morality police, the basij, and other state endorsed security services use the cover of religion to limit social expression in the public sphere.

Also, I look forward to your datasheet on Kish Island.
Reply
#37

Iran/kish Island datasheet

Quote: (01-10-2012 04:13 AM)sheesh Wrote:  

Quote: (01-10-2012 12:25 AM)BostonBMW Wrote:  

Basically you can't expect to roll into ISLAMIC republic of Iran and expect some "friendly Iranian dude" to hook you up with the spots, parties....because they are very literally putting their ass on the line. Even when my "connected" extended family members offered for the hookups, I declined, because I rather not end up like this guy: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/world/...s-spy.html

The situation in Iran is full of contradictions it seems... if you look up chicks from Iran on Badoo, you'll see profiles stating that the person is a lesbian, is living in an open relationship or wants to drink a bottle of champaign with a guy tonight etc.... apparently they don't seem to fear any legal consequences...on the other hand, you do hear ugly storries in the media of foreign businessmen ending up in prison for minor things e.g. holding hands with a Persian woman etc...

That exactly the point. Are there parties going on? Sure. Is booze and slutty girls around? For sure. You just expect to walk into a hotel bar and pick one up. If your social circle is tight, you can have access to everything that might be "outlawed" in public.

You do a risk/reward calculation -- if traveling to Iran works for you, then go for it.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)