The can't get laid at home theory is such bullshit. Half the forum just hates SEA. If it's not your preference so be it. I'm not denying the existence of fat, unattractive, or gold digger type chicks in the Philippines. There definitely are. But there are under the radar valuable chicks there.
Quote: (12-01-2018 12:54 PM)RamRamRam Wrote:
I get laid with girls back home too, but I don't like their attitude.
One thing I highly value is a place not being very superficial. If women are more into behavior than looks or race, that's a big plus to me. I feel Latin American women are more like that than Filipinas, what do you think?
I feel the same way about women in general pertaining to patience to deal with superficial or entitled attitudes. Western girls tend to be prone to both. Filipinas are the least likely to have this from what I've seen because of their backgrounds and the decent women there are still sweeter than girls you'll find in most other spots. It just takes more effort to weed out quality in the Philippines because when you first get there, it's very easy to be on more of a bang mission with less quality. I've said before and I'll say it again, it's kind of opposite rules in the Phils. Guys that go to EE go for the challenge of quality. In the Philippines, if you want quality, your challenge is more defining your definition of it and weeding out the lesser options. There are guys on the forum married and settled down with chicks over there. It can be done.
Not everyone that frequents the Philippines is a bottom feeder is what I'm trying to say. The forum should know better than encouraging that stereotype. That's something I expect to hear from feminists or soy boys. And if you think that, why is the same not applied to Latin American countries like the DR, Mexico, etc.?
I haven't been to real parts of the LA countries though, only resorts in the Bahamas and Cancun when I was younger. But I live in a part of the US with transplants from those parts, so I can't hate on the attraction towards Hispanic girls and also can't comment on city living conditions. However, I do understand the gripes with living in Manila. I stayed there a month and liked it for my time period, but the air pollution can definitely bother some. I know I would've had to have had some island escapes if I stayed long term. Air and sky views are much better once you get away from the city.
Also Baatum, if you want real info on the Philippines, there are some really informative vloggers that have been there for years. Albeit, most are on the older side, but there are a couple of under 40s guys with good info.
Quote: (12-01-2018 09:37 AM)Coke Zero Addict Wrote:
I don't see the appeal of Manila as a longterm base. Bad internet, massively overpriced condos, unhealthy/crappy food, traffic jams. And girls are mostly subpar.
Btw, how are all these young white guys affording to live there longterm? Is everyone a programmer, youtube blogger or digital bromad these days? WTF is going on lol
This is why a lot of expats choose Bali, Thailand and Vietnam over the Philippines. More development and easier to work remotely from. Hell, even Cambodia is starting to close the gap with tourists per year. Went up by 12% last year, think they're only a million behind the Phils now. Younger guys I talk to tend to get into online esl, online or on-the-ground poker, and other remote businesses. A couple actually get into brick and mortar businesses abroad.
I'm getting off topic with the main question and apologize for that. Just felt like the Philippines needed someone defending it in here. I do want to try out Latin America at some point, and certain areas do seem appealing enough to take a shot. But, don't rule out the Philippines if you're just looking in general.
As far back as I could remember, I always wanted to be a player.
2018 New Orleans Datasheet
New Jersey State Datasheet