[Adonis]

The infighting within the DNC just got kicked up a notch.

https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/...nee-796151

Quote:

CHICAGO – Democratic Party officials voted Saturday to strip superdelegates of much of their power in the presidential nominating process, infuriating many traditionalists while handing a victory to the party’s left flank.

The measure’s overwhelming approval – met by cheers in a hotel ballroom here – concluded a tense summer meeting of the Democratic National Committee, which had labored over the issue since 2016. Superdelegates that year largely sided with Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, enraging Sanders’ supporters.

[Bacchus]

One issue to crack the (((high))) and low alliance that makes up the Democratic Party is BDS, Boycott Divestment Sanctions. That movement aims to curb the Israeli abuses against the Palestinians by repeating the campaign against South African Apartheid. Naturally, the Jews are aghast at this.

The candidates who come from outside the establishment (e.g. Crooked) are increasingly far left candidates of nonwhite extraction. They advocate socialist policies. And they interpret everything as nonwhites being oppressed by whites.

In turn, they have more sympathy for Palestine than for Israel because they see the Palestinians as the helpless unarmed victims like Trayvon Martin, while the Israelis are the gun-toting racists like George Zimmerman.

Here's darling of the alt-left Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez making this view explicit. This tweet where she called out Israel's "massacre" of Palestinians caused a lot of controversy, and she defended it as follows.

Quote:

AOC: Well, I believe absolutely in Israel’s right to exist. I am a proponent of a two-state solution. And for me, it’s not — this is not a referendum, I think, on the state of Israel. For me, the lens through which I saw this incident, as an activist, as an organizer, if sixty people were killed in Ferguson, Missouri, if sixty people were killed in the South Bronx — unarmed — if sixty people were killed in Puerto Rico — I just looked at that incident more through . . . through just, as an incident, and to me, it would just be completely unacceptable if that happened on our shores. But I am —

Another example is this Muslim candidate for Congress in Minnesota. Here's a tweet of hers that calls out the "Apartheid Israeli regime"

[/url]

And if you think that these are just isolated candidates who have moved far in front of their electorate, the [url=http://www.people-press.org/2018/01/23/republicans-and-democrats-grow-even-further-apart-in-views-of-israel-palestinians/]polls show that the democrats have little sympathy with Israel.



Next question, "okay, I get it. The new Dems don't like Israel, but neither do I. How does this destroy the Democrats?" Most Jews express mainstream liberal views as well as sympathy for the state of Israel. The Democratic party is shifting far to the left with their new vibrant candidates that they're abandoning support for Israel. The goal should be to confront as many of these candidates with the Palestinian issue. Even better to pin them down on BDS.

When they say they're in favor of BDS, you turn leftist attack dogs like the ADL against them. The Democrats continue to bicker amongst themselves, and the Jews maybe recognize that the changing demographics of the country might be a golem that they can't control.

[Leonard D Neubache]

You don't like Israel?

I like Israel.

I just don't like heaping our blood and treasure on them.

Judea for the Jews. Christendom for the Christians. Etc etc.

It's would solve the Hollywood poz issue pretty much instantly.

[beta_plus]

(08-29-2018 11:47 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

You don't like Israel?

I like Israel.

I just don't like heaping our blood and treasure on them.

Judea for the Jews. Christendom for the Christians. Etc etc.

It's would solve the Hollywood poz issue pretty much instantly.

We all need our separate homelands. This is how the world can have peace and stability.

Unfortunately, the British Empire discovered/created (plus the UK itself) extraordinarily valuable homelands that all 7+ billion non-Anglo people want a piece of:

• The British Isles
• Canada
• The USA (especially the lower 48)
• Australia
• New Zealand
  

[budoslavic]

[url=https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1036431956446068736][/url]

[budoslavic]

[url=https://twitter.com/elainaplott/status/1042534229186420736][/url]

[66Scorpio]

Different peoples don't need different homelands but given the left's curious definition of "diversity" which basically means "anything not white or Christian" they don't leave people with other fallback positions.

[YossariansRight]

   

[Off The Reservation]

[TravelerKai]

That's the kind of video that hurts Conservatives reach to moderates and the youth. It's so blatantly racist it deserves to be deleted.

[Off The Reservation]

^
First of all its just an animated little thing and its funny and edgy, and good humor is based on exaggeration. No requirement that you find it funny, but for me seeing John Mccain and Satan is real belly laughter stuff!

To say it "hurts" "reaching" someone is absurd. It isn't an argument, it's an obscure cartoon.

By deleted do you mean "censored?" Should it's creators also be re-educated to prevent further hurt?

[TravelerKai]

(10-23-2018 07:21 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

^
First of all its just an animated little thing and its funny and edgy, and good humor is based on exaggeration. No requirement that you find it funny, but for me seeing John Mccain and Satan is real belly laughter stuff!

To say it "hurts" "reaching" someone is absurd. It isn't an argument, it's an obscure cartoon.

By deleted do you mean "censored?" Should it's creators also be re-educated to prevent further hurt?

You are lucky Youtube knocked it down before Roosh could see it and give you a temp ban for posting it.

Go peddle race bait somewhere else. Trump himself would slap you and the 1488 guy that made that video. You and the 1488 larper are not helping the cause.

[Off The Reservation]

(10-23-2018 07:33 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(10-23-2018 07:21 PM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

^
First of all its just an animated little thing and its funny and edgy, and good humor is based on exaggeration. No requirement that you find it funny, but for me seeing John Mccain and Satan is real belly laughter stuff!

To say it "hurts" "reaching" someone is absurd. It isn't an argument, it's an obscure cartoon.

By deleted do you mean "censored?" Should it's creators also be re-educated to prevent further hurt?

You are lucky Youtube knocked it down before Roosh could see it and give you a temp ban for posting it.

Go peddle race bait somewhere else. Trump himself would slap you and the 1488 guy that made that video. You and the 1488 larper are not helping the cause.

You still don't seem to get it. I'm not "peddling" anything, I found the cartoon funny in light of the current situation of the Dem party. I'm also not part of any "cause." I get it that the video is part of a belief system that you and Trump (and I for that matter) are not part of but that does not prevent me from laughing at the state of the Dem party through the eyes of the cartoonist.

Did you think I would just fall in line with your desire to thought police what you are exposed to by name dropping "Trump" and "Roosh." You must have me mistaken for some drone.

I apologize for offending you, but... the cartoon is relevant to the Dem party imploding, somewhat (in parts) themed similar to some comments here, and yes I feel lucky. Lucky that I still have a sense of humor.

[CynicalContrarian]

Thread title - 'The Democratic Party is imploding'

Yet their pipe bombs are not exploding...

[Leonard D Neubache]

(10-22-2018 09:09 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

That's the kind of video that hurts Conservatives reach to moderates and the youth. It's so blatantly racist it deserves to be deleted.

That's a nice toggle switch you've got there for the First Amendment. People should really have to run their videos past the NAAPC before they upload them.

Freedom of speech is overrated anyway.

[HornyRamone]

I knew that true to life video would be deleted sooner than later. Does anyone know if Murdoch posted it on other platforms?

[MOVSM]

[url=https://twitter.com/SteveScalise/status/1057280899258163200][/url]

[911]

In case you might have missed this.

[911]

[estraudi]

Dem Party hacking into Georgia Voter Registration
https://twitter.com/PrissysTruth/status/...7098480640

[budoslavic]

DNC isn't looking good for 2020.

[/url]

Quote:

[url=https://www.conservativereview.com/news/democrat-congressmen-take-clandestine-weekend-trip-to-qatar/]Democrat congressmen take clandestine weekend trip to Qatar
Jordan Schachtel · December 17, 2018

Several Democrat members of Congress flew to Doha, Qatar, over the weekend to attend the annual Doha Forum and meet with members of the Qatari regime. But if you’re a constituent or observer, it’s as if the trip never happened.

Conservative Review has found that Democrat Reps. Donald Norcross (N.J.), Dan Kildee (Mich.), Jim Hines (Conn.), Dr. Ami Bera (Calif.), Brendan Boyle (Penn.), and Andre Carson (Ind.) all attended the weekend’s Doha Forum. This information was only found thanks to Qatari state media and a single Twitter post by Ben Smith, the editor of BuzzFeed, which was a sponsor for the Doha Forum.


Qatar News Agency @QNAEnglish
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs met with a delegation of members of the US Congress, on the sidelines of the 18th Doha Forum.
The meeting discussed the strategic cooperation relations between Qatar and the U.S., and issues of common concern.
2:10 PM - Dec 16, 2018

Ben Smith @BuzzFeedBen
Half dozen congressional Democrats in Qatar, Saudi archenemy, today for the #dohaforum: @DonaldNorcross @RepDanKildee @jimchines @RepBera @RepBrendanBoyle @RepAndreCarson
2:32 AM - Dec 15, 2018


In addition to the Democrat representatives, the Doha forum was populated by a disturbing number of radical activists and the leaders of terror-tied countries.

The Security Studies Group wrote a short piece on who I found attended the Doha Forum. Speakers included Iran’s foreign minister, Javad Zarif, an ISIS-tied Turkish official, and a radical anti-Semitic Columbia University professor, to name a few.



Jordan Schachtel @JordanSchachtel
The annual Doha Forum has commenced. Let's see what's on the agenda for our Qatari "allies" (thread)
10:40 AM - Dec 15, 2018

Oh look, there's Berat Albayrak, a Turkish official (Erdogan's son in law) who is best known for setting up an indirect oil pipeline to ISIS. He is also responsible for imprisoning journalists
https://t.co/4INvYe5lxi


Another featured speaker: Professor Hamid Dabashi, a radical anti-Semite who often rages about "filthy Zionists"
https://t.co/4bFro2yFls


Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who is one of the chief propagandists for the world's foremost state sponsor of terrorism.


Additionally, we have a think tanker from the Doha-controlled Brookings Institution. Also top execs from U.S.-based Center for the National Interest and Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Both institutions have taken an ultra friendly position on Qatar in recent months.

Obama's ISIS strategy was a disaster. Should we be surprised that his ISIS "czar" Robert Malley's company, the International Crisis Group, is a "strategic partner" to the Doha Forum?


Lots of Democrat members joined of Congress were in attendance! Who is paying?


(/end @JordanSchachtel's thread)

David Reaboi @davereaboi
I pulled together @JordanSchachtel's tweets on the Doha Forum in Qatar. Jordan goes through some of the Bad and the Ugly in attendance.
https://t.co/u5b7rk8xXU


I reviewed the representatives’ social media accounts and websites found that none of them discussed their weekend trip to Doha. Nothing on Twitter. Nothing on Facebook. Nothing on their congressional websites.

Qatar is arguably the world’s foremost state sponsor of Sunni terrorism, but that hasn’t stopped connected D.C. beltway “elites” and members of our legislative branch from taking Qatari money and influential capital or from attending high-profile events hosted by the Qatari government.

CR has previously reported on Qatar’s $20+ million yearly lobbying campaigns throughout the United States, in which the Doha regime targets influential individuals, organizations, and officials to lobby for its priorities. As another form of quasi-lobbying, the energy-rich nation also makes multibillion-dollar investments in U.S. states, industries, and companies.

In recent years, the Qatari regime has taken strides away from its partnership with the United States and has instead realigned with hostile regimes such as Iran and Turkey. The country’s royals remain ultra-cozy with the Muslim Brotherhood and active jihadist groups in the Middle East. Qatar’s neighbors (which are U.S. allies) have accused Doha of attempting to undermine their governments and fan the flames for foreign-backed revolts to depose domestic officials.

[ed pluribus unum]

(12-25-2018 09:38 AM)budoslavic Wrote:  

DNC isn't looking good for 2020.

"isn't looking good" will only be a thing if GOP 2020 candidates actually make it a thing. Will they call them out on it, or maintain a cuck-worthy silence?

[Waqqle]

(03-09-2017 11:24 PM)Mark Fletcher Wrote:  

(03-09-2017 11:15 PM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(03-08-2017 11:10 PM)Jaydublin Wrote:  

^^^^ Trumps sons are the only ones who Cant be bought and can continue the shitlording. I hope Don Jr runs against Pence in the 2024 primaries.

Ivanka is sexy, but that's all. I'd never vote for her. At the end of the day she's just another basic white girl with just a little more class.

Another woman in charge. That's exactly what we need. Haven't had nearly enough of women calling the shots. Don't get me wrong, she would likely be the least bad female presidential candidate but even self-described "conservative" women are prone to female nonsense.

Merkel, Park Geun-hye, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner are three recent examples of a female heads of state who would have been considered "conservative" candidates in their respective countries but who each succeeded in almost single-handedly collapsing those countries.

[eradicator]

Ivanka is not conservative at all, she is a total democrat and could not vote for her father in the republican primaries in 2016 as a result. Why are people talking like she would run on the republican ticket at some point? She is a liberal democrat through and through, why on earth should we vote for her? She is hot? That’s the only reason?

[MrLemon]

(12-25-2018 01:45 PM)Waqqle Wrote:  

(03-09-2017 11:24 PM)Mark Fletcher Wrote:  

(03-09-2017 11:15 PM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(03-08-2017 11:10 PM)Jaydublin Wrote:  

^^^^ Trumps sons are the only ones who Cant be bought and can continue the shitlording. I hope Don Jr runs against Pence in the 2024 primaries.

Ivanka is sexy, but that's all. I'd never vote for her. At the end of the day she's just another basic white girl with just a little more class.

Another woman in charge. That's exactly what we need. Haven't had nearly enough of women calling the shots. Don't get me wrong, she would likely be the least bad female presidential candidate but even self-described "conservative" women are prone to female nonsense.

Merkel, Park Geun-hye, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner are three recent examples of a female heads of state who would have been considered "conservative" candidates in their respective countries but who each succeeded in almost single-handedly collapsing those countries.

Women are inherently unsuited for the presidency.