[Rhyme or Reason]

(12-05-2016 05:25 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(12-04-2016 10:15 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(12-04-2016 07:34 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote:  

I dunno what it is but I'm starting to think nomadbrah may not like jooz that much.

If you're not willing to criticize Talmudic Jews, you may as well as spread your asscheeks for the refugees and give your virgin daughters over to the hordes.

Ok... but I'd like to see what percentage of his posts are anti-jooz posts. I'm guessing about 70%.

There's more to life than hating jews, nomsayin?

Yeah, I thought it was pretty obvious what my comment was referring to. Sense of humor / sarcasm detection must not be Sam's strong suit...who'dathunkit?

[Sp5]

(12-05-2016 12:03 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 05:19 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

It is pandering to the Israel lobby.

This is not pandering, this is complete domination from a group that is 2% of the population. Your cognitive dissonance on this question is showing again.

Quote:

Jew Glenn Greenwald explains it for you:

It also does not have any real effect, does not make anything "illegal" or a "crime." Just pandering from Congress, like when they passed a resolution to say the Ottoman Empire's actions with Armenians were "genocide."

And why wouldn't it get passed in the House before Obama signs it? It will be law very soon.

Also, comparing the "hate crimes" of Swastikas being painted on Synagogues (which are almost certainly false flag attacks since they are in overwhelmingly blue states) to the actual genocide of Armenians which murdered millions, is one of the most laughable (and disgusting) things you've said on this topic so far. Talk about a false equivalency: this is hardcore hamsterization.

Quote:

Aside from that, the Jew hunting is having a bad effect on the forum. The OP said before he is "obsessed with Jews."

I can't speak for OP, but the sanctimony here has much worse effect on the forum than any amount of "Jew hunting" (i.e. fair criticism of Talmudic Jews).

If someone can provide a legitimate source, and a logical argument, then it should not be above criticism.

Your irrational defense of Jews continues despite the beat down I'm giving you in my Future of America thread. The beatings will continue until rationality improves

Quote:

I know some high-repped Jewish members have disappeared since I joined. I don't know if they got sick of it, just drifted away to other things, got too busy, or went up Nomadbrah's or Samseau's chimney.

Of course, you also completely fail to mention the Jews who come out to affirm what I've said:

thread-59357...pid1450400

Selective choosing of evidence is also cognitive dissonance.

Quote:

Used to be the forum was about men of all kinds together working to improve themselves, game, travel, and fat shame women.

So why can we criticize women but not Talmudic Jews?

1. Is it the job of Congress to be making historical judgments about people long dead? I'm not arguing about whether what the Ottomans did to the Armenians was genocide - organized slaughter with the intent to wipe all Armenians out - or just primitive population displacement in war.

We never saw a Congressional resolution on whether actions against American Indians was "genocide." We never saw one on the Germans killing Herero in SW Africa, the Spanish killing Mexicans in 16th century, or Cro-Magnons killing Neanderthals.

The point was that Armenian Americans wanted to have this resolution passed even though it would have detrimental effect on relations with the Turkish Republic, a NATO ally which hosts American bases. The Armenian Americans were able to lobby and get the resolution passed.

2. Ya, you are giving me a "beat down" in that other thread, if what you mean by "beat down" is continuing to make assertions about the Jews contrary to the historical and current facts.

In that thread, you have said:

-- "Talmudic" Jews [your construct for what most people just call "the Jews"] have been "racist parasites to their host cultures who have destroyed many civilizations in their quest for world racial supremacy."

-- They "have taken over many industries with racism."

-- They are "getting away with crimes."

-- "50% of the surviving Jews of the Roman empire" converted to Christianity, allegedly proven by the fact that you see other Semites in your Syriac church which look like Jews.

-- Jews lend to each other without interest or charge on a large scale.

-- "Talmudic Jews are more likely to engage in selling vice because they feel less attachment to the outgroup than most other cultures do."

-- "Talmudic" Jews "took over" the medical profession, tech, and real estate with "racism."

-- Jews have a disproportionate share of science and medicine Nobel Prizes [awarded by Swedish institutions] because of "Talmudic racism."

When challenged on these statements, you have been unable to find facts to support them.

Readers can judge for themselves, the dialogue begins here: thread-59357-page-3.html

It appears you have been unable to answer me.

3. Your discourse on the Jews mirrors SJW rhetoric. I agree that Jews are disproportionally successful. I say it is because of innate abilities, hard work and family cohesion. You, like a SJW, say it's because of "racism." I quote Roosh and say "so what?" but also that history shows everyone favors their own groups, whether WASP, Irish, Italians, blacks, Chinese, etc, and that there is no evidence that Jews are more racist than other groups.

You have feelings about all of the statements you have made. You would "bet on it." It's all secret knowledge only a few know, right.

Masculine discourse is based on marshalling facts in support of an argument. Feminine discourse is based on expressing feelings and having them affirmed. Facts are objective things, like there are a disproportionate number of Jewish chess champions and Nobel Prize winners in physics. Feelings are "the Jews are racist."

4. Anti-Semitism of the type you express is a failed strategy. The Czar of Russia tried it, Hitler tried it, Nasser and Saddam Hussein tried it. It did not work too well.

In the case of Hitler, he became an anti-Semite for mysterious reasons. On the personal level, Jews bought his paintings. His Jewish lieutenant platoon leader put him in for the Iron Cross during the war.

Maybe it was because he did not get into art school in Vienna and blamed the Jews. He blamed the Jews for Germany's loss in WW I, even though the war was a bad idea and it was inevitable Germany would lose once the USA entered.

On the macro level, the expulsion and killing of Jews weakened Germany. The Jew hunting had indirect effects on non-Jews, too.

Thomas Heisenberg, the German physicist who was the head of the Reich nuclear program, was hounded by the Gestapo for "teaching Jewish physics." Heisenberg pretty much sat on his hands during the war, he wasn't too thrilled by the Nazi government.

Your animus against the Jews has an origin somewhere outside the historical facts. Must be some emotional thing.

You misuse the term "cognitive dissonance" repeatedly. The rest of the world does not have to feel and believe as you do. Disagreement with your feelings is not cognitive dissonance. The facts are objective.

[262]

(12-05-2016 04:04 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 05:25 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(12-04-2016 10:15 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(12-04-2016 07:34 PM)Rhyme or Reason Wrote:  

I dunno what it is but I'm starting to think nomadbrah may not like jooz that much.

If you're not willing to criticize Talmudic Jews, you may as well as spread your asscheeks for the refugees and give your virgin daughters over to the hordes.

Ok... but I'd like to see what percentage of his posts are anti-jooz posts. I'm guessing about 70%.

There's more to life than hating jews, nomsayin?

Yeah, I thought it was pretty obvious what my comment was referring to. Sense of humor / sarcasm detection must not be Sam's strong suit...who'dathunkit?

[Samseau]

(12-06-2016 02:06 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 12:03 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(12-05-2016 05:19 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  

It is pandering to the Israel lobby.

This is not pandering, this is complete domination from a group that is 2% of the population. Your cognitive dissonance on this question is showing again.

Quote:

Jew Glenn Greenwald explains it for you:

It also does not have any real effect, does not make anything "illegal" or a "crime." Just pandering from Congress, like when they passed a resolution to say the Ottoman Empire's actions with Armenians were "genocide."

And why wouldn't it get passed in the House before Obama signs it? It will be law very soon.

Also, comparing the "hate crimes" of Swastikas being painted on Synagogues (which are almost certainly false flag attacks since they are in overwhelmingly blue states) to the actual genocide of Armenians which murdered millions, is one of the most laughable (and disgusting) things you've said on this topic so far. Talk about a false equivalency: this is hardcore hamsterization.

Quote:

Aside from that, the Jew hunting is having a bad effect on the forum. The OP said before he is "obsessed with Jews."

I can't speak for OP, but the sanctimony here has much worse effect on the forum than any amount of "Jew hunting" (i.e. fair criticism of Talmudic Jews).

If someone can provide a legitimate source, and a logical argument, then it should not be above criticism.

Your irrational defense of Jews continues despite the beat down I'm giving you in my Future of America thread. The beatings will continue until rationality improves

Quote:

I know some high-repped Jewish members have disappeared since I joined. I don't know if they got sick of it, just drifted away to other things, got too busy, or went up Nomadbrah's or Samseau's chimney.

Of course, you also completely fail to mention the Jews who come out to affirm what I've said:

thread-59357...pid1450400

Selective choosing of evidence is also cognitive dissonance.

Quote:

Used to be the forum was about men of all kinds together working to improve themselves, game, travel, and fat shame women.

So why can we criticize women but not Talmudic Jews?

1. Is it the job of Congress to be making historical judgments about people long dead? I'm not arguing about whether what the Ottomans did to the Armenians was genocide - organized slaughter with the intent to wipe all Armenians out - or just primitive population displacement in war.

We never saw a Congressional resolution on whether actions against American Indians was "genocide." We never saw one on the Germans killing Herero in SW Africa, the Spanish killing Mexicans in 16th century, or Cro-Magnons killing Neanderthals.

The point was that Armenian Americans wanted to have this resolution passed even though it would have detrimental effect on relations with the Turkish Republic, a NATO ally which hosts American bases. The Armenian Americans were able to lobby and get the resolution passed.

Why can we recognize a Jewish genocide but not an Armenian one? The Holocaust was also disputed by remnants of the Nazi government, including soldiers, who claimed there was no large scale genocide but instead massive starvation in concentration camps towards the end of the war due to intense Allied bombing.

Yet we not only recognize the Holocaust, but there is a museum in DC for it. Why can't there be a Christian genocide museum for the Holodomor and Russian extermination of Christians at the hands of Talmudic Communists? Or for Armenians?

Quote:

2. Ya, you are giving me a "beat down" in that other thread, if what you mean by "beat down" is continuing to make assertions about the Jews contrary to the historical and current facts.

In that thread, you have said:

-- "Talmudic" Jews [your construct for what most people just call "the Jews"] have been "racist parasites to their host cultures who have destroyed many civilizations in their quest for world racial supremacy."

-- They "have taken over many industries with racism."

-- They are "getting away with crimes."

-- "50% of the surviving Jews of the Roman empire" converted to Christianity, allegedly proven by the fact that you see other Semites in your Syriac church which look like Jews.

-- Jews lend to each other without interest or charge on a large scale.

-- "Talmudic Jews are more likely to engage in selling vice because they feel less attachment to the outgroup than most other cultures do."

-- "Talmudic" Jews "took over" the medical profession, tech, and real estate with "racism."

-- Jews have a disproportionate share of science and medicine Nobel Prizes [awarded by Swedish institutions] because of "Talmudic racism."

When challenged on these statements, you have been unable to find facts to support them.

Not only have I cited plenty in that thread to support all claims, but I will be adding more soon. Conversely anything you've cited just proves their outsized influence that breaks all affirmative action and disparate impact laws. This is called getting away with crime.

Quote:

Readers can judge for themselves, the dialogue begins here: thread-59357-page-3.html

It appears you have been unable to answer me.

It appears your hamster is unable to read.

Quote:

3. Your discourse on the Jews mirrors SJW rhetoric. I agree that Jews are disproportionally successful. I say it is because of innate abilities, hard work and family cohesion. You, like a SJW, say it's because of "racism." I quote Roosh and say "so what?" but also that history shows everyone favors their own groups, whether WASP, Irish, Italians, blacks, Chinese, etc, and that there is no evidence that Jews are more racist than other groups.

The difference is I'm not an SJW.

If Talmudic Jews are allowed to discriminate, then Whites should be able to as well. If there are Talmudic only schools, then there should be allowed White only schools as well.

If Talmuds are allowed to attend schools at 5x-20x their population size, other groups should be able to as well.

But if there are laws to prohibit these things, they must apply to Talmudic Jews as well.

The difference between me and you is I see things objectively, and I have no predisposition on this side of the debate other than to mock the hypocrisy of Talmudic Jews.

Talmudic Jews are the ones who are always bitching about White racism and White supremacy, and yet they themselves live by a supremacist code. They are the ones who advocate most fiercely to limit "White power" and make up 20% of the Democratic Senate, which is 10x their population size.

I've yet to see you address any of these problems in the Future of America thread.

Quote:

You have feelings about all of the statements you have made. You would "bet on it." It's all secret knowledge only a few know, right.

Masculine discourse is based on marshalling facts in support of an argument. Feminine discourse is based on expressing feelings and having them affirmed. Facts are objective things, like there are a disproportionate number of Jewish chess champions and Nobel Prize winners in physics. Feelings are "the Jews are racist."

4. Anti-Semitism of the type you express is a failed strategy. The Czar of Russia tried it, Hitler tried it, Nasser and Saddam Hussein tried it. It did not work too well.

In the case of Hitler, he became an anti-Semite for mysterious reasons. On the personal level, Jews bought his paintings. His Jewish lieutenant platoon leader put him in for the Iron Cross during the war.

Maybe it was because he did not get into art school in Vienna and blamed the Jews. He blamed the Jews for Germany's loss in WW I, even though the war was a bad idea and it was inevitable Germany would lose once the USA entered.

On the macro level, the expulsion and killing of Jews weakened Germany. The Jew hunting had indirect effects on non-Jews, too.

Thomas Heisenberg, the German physicist who was the head of the Reich nuclear program, was hounded by the Gestapo for "teaching Jewish physics." Heisenberg pretty much sat on his hands during the war, he wasn't too thrilled by the Nazi government.

Your animus against the Jews has an origin somewhere outside the historical facts. Must be some emotional thing.

You misuse the term "cognitive dissonance" repeatedly. The rest of the world does not have to feel and believe as you do. Disagreement with your feelings is not cognitive dissonance. The facts are objective.

The facts are objective, and not only have you not been able to dispute them but you've yet to address the subject of this thread matter which is Talmudic Jews using their outsized influence to suppress free speech in the Senate.

In this thread, with regards to the OP, your argument as to why this is merely "pandering" is a terrible argument with no real substance.

[Zep]

Sp5, since you brought up Glenn Greenwald.

He's aware of Jewish speech hypocrisy too...see, the cartoons are about the double-standard of Jewish speech laws.

https://theintercept.com/2015/01/09/soli...-cartoons/

Quote:

I’ve previously covered cases where Muslims were imprisoned for many years in the U.S. for things like translating and posting “extremist” videos to the internet, writing scholarly articles in defense of Palestinian groups and expressing harsh criticism of Israel, and even including a Hezbollah channel in a cable package. That’s all well beyond the numerous cases of jobs being lost or careers destroyed for expressing criticism of Israel or (much more dangerously and rarely) Judaism. I’m hoping this week’s celebration of free speech values will generate widespread opposition to all of these long-standing and growing infringements of core political rights in the west, not just some.

[MrBoombastic]

So as long as we don't talk about Zionists controlling the world and banks on a college or school campus, we can't be charged? Just another reason to say fuck you to college and avoid college.

[Samseau]

Meanwhile, as the (((SLPC))) continues to rant against Trump and White people, the NYPost discovers that 2,000 hate crimes against Whites were "omitted" from the official report.

http://nypost.com/2016/12/05/report-buri...hite-kids/

They move to suppress speech on only one direction.

Quote:

Bader pointed out that most of the anti-minority “hate crimes” and “hate incidents” cited by SPLC do not legally constitute hate crimes, and many involve constitutionally protected speech.

“It is simply ridiculous that SPLC treats ‘build the wall’ as hate rhetoric,” he said. The center counted people mentioning “build the wall” as 467 incidents of hate.

“Alas, these days the SPLC is mainly a fundraising machine,” said Gail Heriot, a US Commission on Civil Rights member who voted against Friday’s resolution. “The more it can persuade its donors that hate groups have penetrated every nook and cranny of American society, the more money it can raise. Now it wants us to believe that the election has unleashed unprecedented waves of hatred and violence among schoolchildren. Let’s stop and take a deep breath before we assume that’s true. The SPLC has no credibility with anyone — on the left or the right — who is familiar with its methods.”

This is the same (((SPLC))) that would shut down this forum if given half the chance, as they've put Roosh on their hate crime list.

[Irenicus]

Are they retards or what?


Didn't they learn their lesson from ADL (who made fools of themselves, and reveled whom they serve - our good friend George)?


Oh, by the way, I have heard that Trump is... very trigger happy with lawsuits. Hopefully, he will make an example out of them. I would do if I were him, for sure.

[Deepdiver]

Silver lining is we can use same twisted logic er ah um rationale to prosecute the ANTI CHRISTIANS... IRONICALLY JIHADIS, BLM, SOROS, and Marxist Feminist Christian hating Castro loving Communist Obamunists.