[El Chinito loco]

(04-12-2015 06:51 PM)Akula Wrote:  

(04-12-2015 06:45 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

Good god almighty just look at this list of potential 2016 candidates.

This is the political version of dumpster diving.

Hillary Clinton - Not going to beat a dead horse here. Might as well elect one of those store mannequins.

Lindsey Graham - Ultra hawk and Israel super advocate. Enjoy more misguided military adventures. Obvious neo-con shill.

Scott Walker - Shady as hell and pretty hated in his own state. Had all sorts of policy blunders and I believe the mainstream disatisfaction with him comes from being inept at budgeting. Imagine him running the entire nation...into the ground.

Marco Rubio - Still not sure what this guy is all about. He seems to flip flop a lot on policies and tries to play up populism. Comes across as disengenuous even for modern day politics. Hispanic sounding last name might dupe some minority voters and white liberals though.

Jeb Bush - Bush family rep. Surely has neo-con loyalties. Don't care how different he or others claim he is. Not buying it.

Rand Paul - tea party affiliations and non establishment support makes him very unlikely. He would probably be the only risk worth taking.

Ted Cruz - Has very strong Bush-Cheney affiliations and was brought up in that environment. Very likely Neo-con shill. His whole platform seems to be based on anti-Obama and little substance. Hispanic last name to dupe some minority voters and white liberals.



Look at all the trash. Just look at it.

As bad as Hillary is (and I hate to say it) she'd be better than Linsday Graham. He or any of the neocon guys will have us arming Ukraine, attacking Iran etc. and just carrying on like Bush II. With a Republican Congress and President at the same time it would be disastrous from a foreign policy perspective. They also tend to seemingly turn into big spending Dems and bigger corporate welfare promoters on the domestic side when they hold both the presidency and congress.

You are technically correct that she'd be better than Graham but don't underestimate Hillary's hawkish policy stance either. She's very hawkish and has neo-con sympathies as well. She was gung-ho about Iraq and was very inept as Secretary of state. Her middle east and asia diplomacy has been disastrous. I'd say she was bad to the point of alienating heads of state with her attitude.

Her social intelligence seems very low and it's probably due to being a natural unfeeling sociopath on top of trying hard to prove something. She's a dangerous person to have in office.

[The Father]

(04-12-2015 03:48 PM)aSimpNamedBrokeback Wrote:  

This forum gives her way too much credit. In 2008 she was dumped faster than Taco Bell when people realized Obama was a viable candidate, why does everyone think round will be any different? She's too smug, unattractive and old.

Totally agree. As Tom Leykis said in 2008 "Americans so did not want a woman president...they voted for the black guy".

[El Chinito loco]

(04-12-2015 07:07 PM)The Father Wrote:  

(04-12-2015 03:48 PM)aSimpNamedBrokeback Wrote:  

This forum gives her way too much credit. In 2008 she was dumped faster than Taco Bell when people realized Obama was a viable candidate, why does everyone think round will be any different? She's too smug, unattractive and old.

Totally agree. As Tom Leykis said in 2008 "Americans so did not want a woman president...they voted for the black guy".

Obama-mania was wild though. He was like Denzel, Jay-Z, Lebron, and Morgan Freeman rolled into one in 2008. The cool black celebrity factor was off the charts and even other countries got in on it.

No way were people looking at Obama in the rational sense of just a candidate vs a woman president. Hillary had no hope going up against that kind of celebrity hype.

However with the current field of clowns and charisma black holes she may be able to edge out a win. She's firmly pro-establishment and is a team player in that sense.

[Shrodax]

(04-12-2015 06:53 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(04-12-2015 06:48 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

Rand Paul and Jim Webb are the only two candidates worth an acknowledgement.

They both have wives who pass the boner test too.

Rand Paul getting the Republican nomination and Jim Webb getting the Democratic nomination would be my dream for 2016. We might actually get to see a fairly honorable competition for president in that case and an election result that would be good for America no matter who won. So, that means it probably won't ever happen.

Also, if we're gonna use the test of the bangability of candidates' wives, we should've inaugurated President Dennis Kucinich a long time ago.

[Dusty]

(04-12-2015 07:31 PM)Shrodax Wrote:  

(04-12-2015 06:53 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(04-12-2015 06:48 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

Rand Paul and Jim Webb are the only two candidates worth an acknowledgement.

They both have wives who pass the boner test too.

Rand Paul getting the Republican nomination and Jim Webb getting the Democratic nomination would be my dream for 2016. We might actually get to see a fairly honorable competition for president in that case and an election result that would be good for America no matter who won. So, that means it probably won't ever happen.

Also, if we're gonna use the test of the bangability of candidates' wives, we should've inaugurated President Dennis Kucinich a long time ago.

[aSimpNamedBrokeback]

(04-12-2015 07:49 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

400 reasons why Hillary might become president.

[Libertas]

(04-12-2015 06:53 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

They both have wives who pass the boner test too.

Crucial distinction. See, this is part of how I get my cues. Guys on this forum intimately know that the kind of woman a man is willing to be seen with, much less settles down with, says a lot about him.

Let's take two recent "progressive" politicians and compare.





Lo and behold, look what happens.

It's part of what Tuth called some time ago, "the distinction between pussy and non-pussy."

(04-12-2015 07:31 PM)Shrodax Wrote:  

Dennis is another good guy too. Surprised?

Also, a less flattering image of Hillary's lover:

[Dr. Howard]

(04-12-2015 07:54 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

Also, a less flattering image of Hillary's lover:

I found another picture of her

[Collide]

[Aliblahba]

If Hillary wins, the players age of the U.S. is over. She already has no problems killing off alpha males (from a distance), neutering an ex, and kissing Alien.


I'll leave you with a glimpse of the future. Enjoy!*


   

*btw- I've always been Republican.

[VolandoVengoVolandoVoy]

I'm a former political junkie, and I find it hard to understand how people still get so excited about politics, especially on RVF.

Once I became red pill is when I stopped caring about politics, let me explain why.

For me, the central part of being red pill is realizing that you are in control of your own destiny, that you decide what experiences you have in life - no one is going to give you anything or solve your problems for you.

It makes no difference to me who wins the race for president in 2016, it will not affect my real, actual, day to day life in anyway at all. How often I go to the gym, what books I read, how many approaches I do, how many quality women I bang, how many good meals I cook, all of these things will have a MUCH bigger impact on my life than which figurehead claws their way to the top of a corrupt heap by lying most convincingly.

[TheFinalEpic]

(04-12-2015 04:12 PM)Collide Wrote:  

The fact that she is a woman is enough to secure the millennial vote. The only kind of politics that works this decade is identity politics.

This just shows how fucked America is. The guys that are advocating for her are blubbering beta males in the purest form. Millennials have no concept of the ruin that woman would bring to the western world if she came into office. Have you seen how Vladimir Putin treats Obama? Multiply that shit by 10,000 and you'll see why the states would be the laughing stock of the political world.

[el mechanico]

Hillary= Bill

Bush= Bush

No thanks. The Bush family is a complete super rich disconnect.

[Libertas]

http://toprightnews.com/hillary-clintons...ouncement/

Quote:

And a CNN contributor later claimed that the #Hillary2016 hashtag only appeared on the list after her the panicking campaign consultants spending megabucks to make it trend. And they still couldn’t top the anti-Hillary topic.

The train wreck begins.

[Collide]

Conservative QT's are best QT's.

[kosko]

I called this 4 years ago. Benghazi was the only real hope to kill the wicked witch of D.C. for good. That literally almost destroyed her political career and we would of been ridden of the Ghoul from Gotham named Hillary. After nearing loosing her political marbles and gaming 40 pounds and aging 40 years she went into the chamber (I suspect HGH.. but hey just my speculation) to shed some years of her and not appear like a lifeless fossil and now just looks like a boring grandmother instead.

I don't know what RVF does politically. Every 4 years the mass majority get way to invested and start digesting large amounts of junk media and mainstream opinions only to moan more and more of how stuff keeps on getting worse for the average man. For Hillary to get to this point, it was all lad down very clearly many years ago. If you are of a critical political mind this can't even surprise you. Any dude truly in the Red Pill just laughs at this. It was so easy to see coming.

Next, people seem to be forgetting the money aspect. The only legitimate candidates are the ones who can pull in that dirty money. This will likely be a $2 billion dollar contest. Which of those Republican empty suits can pull $1 billion?+

People need to get with it that this game is rigged. Hillary out of all them has the biggest money pull potential which should easily hammer in that this whole campaign is rigged from the start. Who else in that list above can pull that money?

From the money standpoint alone you can already guess who it will be:

Jeb Bush Vs. Hillary Clinton

Two nepotistic family clans with access to billions going against each other. The media will have a field day with it and Americans will remain clueless as to how two families have ruled all political office in the most of the modern age post-Cold war. Its is too obvious but you know the average American who likes Hardes, his K-Cup Coffee machine, and NASCAR is as dumb as doorknob and won't be able to connect those dots.

So now the Republicans will roll out a dummy doll, likely in Jeb Bush who will do the usual of being ultra extreme to get the hard of right in Iowa down and then be a walking contradiction once the primaries are won and he is on the national stage appealing to all sides, thus to become a dead horse and unelectable. The Republicans are in ideology trap as the power and money in their corner is held by its most extreme which are distasteful to the majority of Americans.

Hillary will be during her campaign more "right" then Obama who was a beta all all about passivity and striking deals. She has 8 years of softy beta man leadership to profile against and since she is woman she can talk "tough" and nobody will fault her for it. As I have noted before, expect her to be aggressive on war/foreign policy. Iran for example and the softy deal the USA signed with Iran, watch Hillary be able to troll and act like she has some fake nuts in talking hot rhetoric to Iran in contrasting her as more dominate then Obama.

So once again, political threads like this proves that many on this forum on only "red pill" with pussy. Look at all the cheerleding for Rand Paul when the fact of the matter is.. for him to be a "viable" candidate, he has to shill and grovel like all the rest of the deadbeats of the past to bend over to Wall Street and other corrupt interests whom will shower him with the $1 Billion needed to compete. The flavor of the month here is Rand Paul, and ff he is in fact a legit "candidate" then he is corrupted. It is just that simple. The process in this modern age does not steer towards any other direction, viable and real candidates get marginalized, and ran through the mud in the press, or simply ignored.

I simply accepted the fact that Hillary would be accented to the throne when Obama squeezed out a 2nd term. Once Obama did that I knew the Republicans were DOA and would not be a factor the next time around. You saw quickly the shift towards preparing the media landscape for this election with the assault on gender and propping and protection of the female narrative on all aspects.

Like I said before. Understand and accept the game is rigged and get your popcorn out. I can't wait for this mess of campaign, the amount of material coming out of it will be pure gold.

Its a waste of time bickering on which side of the coin is going to fuck you over the least. Neither party has your best interest in mind and all work for the same corrupt interests.

Your better off using that effort to get your shit in check for when the folly comes full circle. Hillary in the POTUS seat means that the small bit of rope that modern men had left in this modern age will be taken away. Economically Men are already 2nd class, the economy has been nearly full tilted towards women. Next, Socially Men have been tarred and feathered through all means of SJW crusades to paint anything with a penis as evil and the devil. Now all that is left is to shut the books on the any shred of male focus left in the political sphere. The world of politics has been a female oasis for while now but Hillary will be the last straw. So instead of arguing over which losers will never win (Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, etc).

[The Father]

(04-12-2015 08:29 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

Hillary= Bill

Bush= Bush

No thanks. The Bush family is a complete super rich disconnect.

Agree. Don't want Hitlary OR a Bush. The only bush I wanna see is on vintage 1980's porn

[younggun]

The whole idea of Clinton getting votes because she's a woman is curious. The thing is, there are always going to be libtards pushing for the first female president, just like there was the push for the first black president. Eventually, they are going to get their wish.

So what happens next? Until recently, I believed that a white male president would never happen again, but now I'm not so sure. If an African-American were to run in the upcoming election, they wouldn't have as much backing based on race as Obama did.

Of course the tumblr types will never be happy until a black transgender overweight midget on stilts is the president, but maybe America suffers through one female president and the beta males and borderline feminists back off?

[RawGod]

It will be amusing to see all the high-fiving over the first female president if Hillary is elected, as if it were America's latest and greatest demonstration of how wonderfully progressive and unique it is, when other countries - including India, Pakistan, UK, Turkey - have had female leaders for decades.

[MrLemon]

Bush + Paul/Walker for VP

The southern and midwestern states feel like there is NO WAY IN HELL they will vote for a woman. It will be Bush/Paul/Walker vs. Clinton. Bush will win. Everybody will gasp and pretend to faint. But most politicians knew it was coming.

Republican Congress. Republican President. Personally I don't care, I'm focused on getting the hell out of the country.

[iamdegaussed]

Played "spot the feminist cunt" on facebook tonight by seeing all the people crowing about Hillary's announcement.

[DChambers]

(04-12-2015 09:25 PM)kosko Wrote:  

I called this 4 years ago. Benghazi was the only real hope to kill the wicked witch of D.C. for good. That literally almost destroyed her political career and we would of been ridden of the Ghoul from Gotham named Hillary. After nearing loosing her political marbles and gaming 40 pounds and aging 40 years she went into the chamber (I suspect HGH.. but hey just my speculation) to shed some years of her and not appear like a lifeless fossil and now just looks like a boring grandmother instead.

I don't know what RVF does politically. Every 4 years the mass majority get way to invested and start digesting large amounts of junk media and mainstream opinions only to moan more and more of how stuff keeps on getting worse for the average man. For Hillary to get to this point, it was all lad down very clearly many years ago. If you are of a critical political mind this can't even surprise you. Any dude truly in the Red Pill just laughs at this. It was so easy to see coming.

Next, people seem to be forgetting the money aspect. The only legitimate candidates are the ones who can pull in that dirty money. This will likely be a $2 billion dollar contest. Which of those Republican empty suits can pull $1 billion?+

People need to get with it that this game is rigged. Hillary out of all them has the biggest money pull potential which should easily hammer in that this whole campaign is rigged from the start. Who else in that list above can pull that money?

From the money standpoint alone you can already guess who it will be:

Jeb Bush Vs. Hillary Clinton

Two nepotistic family clans with access to billions going against each other. The media will have a field day with it and Americans will remain clueless as to how two families have ruled all political office in the most of the modern age post-Cold war. Its is too obvious but you know the average American who likes Hardes, his K-Cup Coffee machine, and NASCAR is as dumb as doorknob and won't be able to connect those dots.

So now the Republicans will roll out a dummy doll, likely in Jeb Bush who will do the usual of being ultra extreme to get the hard of right in Iowa down and then be a walking contradiction once the primaries are won and he is on the national stage appealing to all sides, thus to become a dead horse and unelectable. The Republicans are in ideology trap as the power and money in their corner is held by its most extreme which are distasteful to the majority of Americans.

Hillary will be during her campaign more "right" then Obama who was a beta all all about passivity and striking deals. She has 8 years of softy beta man leadership to profile against and since she is woman she can talk "tough" and nobody will fault her for it. As I have noted before, expect her to be aggressive on war/foreign policy. Iran for example and the softy deal the USA signed with Iran, watch Hillary be able to troll and act like she has some fake nuts in talking hot rhetoric to Iran in contrasting her as more dominate then Obama.

So once again, political threads like this proves that many on this forum on only "red pill" with pussy. Look at all the cheerleding for Rand Paul when the fact of the matter is.. for him to be a "viable" candidate, he has to shill and grovel like all the rest of the deadbeats of the past to bend over to Wall Street and other corrupt interests whom will shower him with the $1 Billion needed to compete. The flavor of the month here is Rand Paul, and ff he is in fact a legit "candidate" then he is corrupted. It is just that simple. The process in this modern age does not steer towards any other direction, viable and real candidates get marginalized, and ran through the mud in the press, or simply ignored.

I simply accepted the fact that Hillary would be accented to the throne when Obama squeezed out a 2nd term. Once Obama did that I knew the Republicans were DOA and would not be a factor the next time around. You saw quickly the shift towards preparing the media landscape for this election with the assault on gender and propping and protection of the female narrative on all aspects.

Like I said before. Understand and accept the game is rigged and get your popcorn out. I can't wait for this mess of campaign, the amount of material coming out of it will be pure gold.

Its a waste of time bickering on which side of the coin is going to fuck you over the least. Neither party has your best interest in mind and all work for the same corrupt interests.

Your better off using that effort to get your shit in check for when the folly comes full circle. Hillary in the POTUS seat means that the small bit of rope that modern men had left in this modern age will be taken away. Economically Men are already 2nd class, the economy has been nearly full tilted towards women. Next, Socially Men have been tarred and feathered through all means of SJW crusades to paint anything with a penis as evil and the devil. Now all that is left is to shut the books on the any shred of male focus left in the political sphere. The world of politics has been a female oasis for while now but Hillary will be the last straw. So instead of arguing over which losers will never win (Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, etc).

Kosko. With all due respect, while you have a great deal of insight into many topics, I find your political insights rather less than clear. You have a firm cynicism and apathy that shows contempt for almost any figure. While this isn't necessarily wrong (though I personaly think it is) you have in the past it appears let your apathy cloud your judgement. You at one point said,


"But for Ron Pauls son Rand? His son sold out 100% to be given the higher platforms his father was never granted. This "chance" Rand Paul has in. 2016 will simply via the same manufactured machine that gave Obama the same chance. The money might come from different hands but the greater forces all push the political class towards the same direction."

Which is ridiculous as his record shows. A sell out is a harsh term. He altered some positions a bit to be elected, but he maintains his libertarian positions on the important issues.

I have to wonder, do you view any candidate in a negative light if they reach a prominent position simply because you believe a power must be behind them in order to reach such a position?

[Foolsgo1d]

Is Hillary Lesbian now? I guess she got the message from Bill then.

[RoastBeefCurtains4Me]

(04-12-2015 06:45 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

Scott Walker - Shady as hell and pretty hated in his own state (by his political opposition who had the voting minority). Had all sorts of policy blunders and I believe the mainstream dissatisfaction with him comes from being inept at budgeting (according to a certain big government point of view). Imagine him running the entire nation...into the ground (from the point of view of government employees fearing for their jobs).

There, fixed it for you.

God forbid he cut the federal government too much!

[RoastBeefCurtains4Me]

(04-12-2015 07:31 PM)Shrodax Wrote:  

(04-12-2015 06:53 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(04-12-2015 06:48 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

Rand Paul and Jim Webb are the only two candidates worth an acknowledgement.

They both have wives who pass the boner test too.

Rand Paul getting the Republican nomination and Jim Webb getting the Democratic nomination would be my dream for 2016. We might actually get to see a fairly honorable competition for president in that case and an election result that would be good for America no matter who won. So, that means it probably won't ever happen.

Also, if we're gonna use the test of the bangability of candidates' wives, we should've inaugurated President Dennis Kucinich a long time ago.

This is the really value of this thread in a game based forum. Why did Kucinich get a wife like that? He went after hot chicks exclusively, then he charmed their panties off. You know he banged other hot chicks with congressman game before marrying this one.

Lesson: if you go after hot chicks exclusively and learn to charm them, you will find ones that like you, and will be able to fuck them!