Pumpkin, you can't just make up facts when the actual facts are on public record for anyone to access.
How is it that a professor employed by the university is encouraging her to show such disregard to rulings already decided by the tribunal?
This woman clearly has no place in academia. Also it's interesting that they've gone with the term "gender based harassment." He's a man and therefore it's impossible for his privilege to be usurped in order for him to experience harassment.
"I believe Emma..." Despite all the evidence that would suggest that you shouldn't believe Emma, she still
feels that Emma should be believed. Why the hell are women with their incapacity for systematic logical thought allowed to even vote, let alone run for office.
Actually, when I checked, the first auto-correct suggestion was "Emma Sulkowitcz liar."
"He needs to practise silence or suicide." Emma Sulkowitcz liked this. Wow, just wow. Wishing for a young, talented man to take his life due to your desire for attention? I hope you get cancer.
Yes we know his name because you she defied name suppression orders on multiple occasions.
Despite the fact that he has never faced any charges, they are presenting as fact the idea that he is a serial rapist.
Obviously I wouldn't endorse it, but I could almost sympathise with a man who went all Elliot Roger on those bitch's asses under those kind of circumstances.
This is an excerpt from Columbia University's official harassment policy. All of it is relevant in this case.
This guy has a pretty water tight case. I really hope he doesn't settle and lets it go to trial. Then I hope he goes after Emma.