[Nomad77]

http://www.rooshv.com/the-one-thing-i-hate-about-life

In this video Roosh talks about his inability to duplicate the initial excitement of an experience with a girl or even a place.

There is a saying: you can only experience something for the first time once. Once you have experience it everything else will be judged by that experience. And since a first great experience is being compared to zero it is always great! I spent years chasing my first time in Brazil in the same way.

But there is an experience that I have been able to duplicate and it is always as good as the first time. And that experience is love. I have never found the love of a girl any less of great experience than any previous girl that I have loved. Unfortunately, this does not work for sex. My standards when it comes to sex are so ridiculously high now that it is almost impossible to find a girl that will meet them. But since love is this undefinable thing this does not happen with it.

I have never gotten any less joy from the first moment a girl sees me and her face lights up and I look into her eyes and realize that I am the source of that light. Even after all these years, it still stops me in my tracks and make me want to capture that moment and hold it for just a little bit longer...

[soup]

Nomad- you ever considered starting your own blog?

[Nomad77]

Not enough time.

[party1981]

I've told Roosh before - he seems to have an chronic interest in happiness and his inability to achieve it. He talks about that a lot.

I suspect he's mid-to-high neurotic on the Big Five:

http://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/

I've recommended that he read more books on positive psychology and happiness. But that's just my two cents.

[Vitriol]

(06-29-2014 06:01 PM)party1981 Wrote:  

I've told Roosh before - he seems to have an chronic interest in happiness and his inability to achieve it. He talks about that a lot.

This is also something I've thought about a lot over the past few years and I'm glad he wrote an article about it.

After I went off to college, when I would visit my parents I would stop by some of my old haunts from when I was a teenager. Only problem was I felt like a ghost walking around there and none of my friends were there anymore. The places were still there physically, but they didn't feel the same at all.

That's kind of how it is with any time and place in your life. You have a certain group of people around you, and certain things happening during that time. However, once it's over you can never go back and recapture it. Trying to live in the past is one of the biggest mistakes I see people making, and it can waste a lot of time over the years if you're not careful. This is why you always need to be setting new goals and align yourself mentally to be sure you're aware of what's going on in the present, and forget about who you were and where you were a few years ago.

[Nomad77]

Exactly life is a one way street.

[OneIdea]

(06-29-2014 03:39 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

But there is an experience that I have been able to duplicate and it is always as good as the first time. And that experience is love. I have never found the love of a girl any less of great experience than any previous girl that I have loved.

This is absolutely true . . . when you're 22.

At 32? Maybe.

At 42? Nope.

At 52? Only self-deluded fools fall in love at this age—and usually, they're not falling in love, but rather wanting to fall in love so bad that they convince themselves that they are, even when they're not.

I'm 46. You can't really fall in love after 32 or 35 or so. Not unless you've been a hermit or a monk. People who claim that they've "fallen in love" are likely trying to recapture their own youth, rather than genuinely experiencing the emotion.

Actually, now that I think about it, the over-40 and over-50 men I know who most vocally claim they've "fallen in love" are precisely the ones most terrified of aging. Precisely the ones who go for tummy-tucks and jowl-tucks, precisely the ones driving around in muscle cars and Ferraris.

Just my 2¢.

[Nomad77]

If you believe that your age defines what you can or cannot do then you are limiting yourself in a serious way. You can call it whatever you like but when a woman really cares about you, it's one hell of a great feeling. I know a lot of men on here has had some bad experiences but that because they forgot that they still need game even when in love.

[Cr33pin]

(06-29-2014 03:39 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

I have never gotten any less joy from the first moment a girl sees me and her face lights up and I look into her eyes and realize that I am the source of that light. Even after all these years, it still stops me in my tracks and make me want to capture that moment and hold it for just a little bit longer...

Some beautiful shit man

[Nomad77]

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.

Roosh has gone down one road and I another.

[soup]

Nomad I think it would be cool if you come post some stuff in the notch thread.

[Nomad77]

It's not my focus and I don't think there is anything I can add. There are guys out there like you and Roosh who gets way more pussy than me in any given month or year.

Here is what my thoughts on sex are: http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-25274.html

[soup]

Then why do you post in the game section?

[Nomad77]

Game is a tool and just like any tool you can decide how to use it to achieve a desired outcome. I don't use game to get sex. I use game to build and maintain relationships with women. I am not interested in ONS or SDL. I am also interested in helping the "average" guy find and create meaningful relationships with quality women - which is what I think most guys really want.

The truth is, in any given year, I will turn down sex from more women than I will have sex with. For me sex is a reward to women for good behavior.

[soup]

The definition that roosh wrote about this forum category is "getting girls in the sack."

[Nomad77]

Ye, and that fact that after banging lots of girls he doesn't seem too happy and the pleasure of it is decreasing. This is something I have already learned awhile back.

[soup]

Nomad you are trolling

[Nomad77]

Actually I think you are one that's trolling on my threads. You don't see me talking crap on your threads and I guess I made up the video that Roosh posted himself.

Why do you feel threatened by me soup No one else complains about my threads and lot of people actually seem to like them.

[soup]

(06-30-2014 02:10 AM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

Actually I think you are one that's trolling on my threads. You don't see me talking crap on your threads and I guess I made up the video that Roosh posted himself.

Why do you feel threatened by me soup No one else complains about my threads and lot of people actually seem to like them.

If you are saying things like "my thread" then it might be better for you to start your own blog.

Also, I'm pretty sure that Roosh doesn't appreciate your not so subtle psychoanalytic trolling.

Are you his therapist?

Man, every time I read your threads now, the image of Eliot Rodgers pops into my mind.

Don't take it personally- I think you might have good intentions, but you come off as very theoretical and "post-game"

Why don't you drop some more solid knowledge?

[Nomad77]

"Don’t argue with idiots. They’ll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience."

[soup]

(06-30-2014 03:59 AM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

"Don’t argue with idiots. They’ll drag you down to their level then beat you with experience."

Again, this is the pussy way of trying to insult someone. Read like a woman's insulting.

[Christian McQueen]

[casio]

No one benefits from this argument, which is basically quality vs quantity on a higher level. I can see what nomad says/means - and it's in line with his previous thoughts and life philosophy on dating/sex.

[Nomad77]

Yes, my position has always been that quality is better than quantity and that a bunch of notches doesn't really mean much. Thanks

[soup]

If you are getting all of these high quality girls, than why are you whining here so often?