Quote: (06-16-2014 10:47 AM)agentaika Wrote:
Quote: (06-15-2014 09:19 PM)Feisbook Control Wrote:
Two people I plan to read in the near future are Saul Alinsky and Antonio Gramsci. The current state of the West didn't happen entirely by accident. It was planned. If we expect things to change, they might change by themselves, but why not give them a helping hand?
Exactly. We can't just live our lives in the hopes that these problems will fix themselves, or that someone else will fix them. And we can't underestimate the power of social media marketing. We have to dip our dicks in that space and dirty it up a bit.
I've already made my "feminist" Twitter profile. It's sitting dormant now. I only plan on using it when a hashtag from a "hashtag activist" or 4chan starts trending again.
Quote: (06-15-2014 02:50 PM)Slick Shimmer Wrote:
No more male nurses. They'll fall for it.
Quote: (06-16-2014 08:08 AM)Slick Shimmer Wrote:
#NoMoreMaleNurses because men lack empathy, and are always looking for their next victim. (This one will work well because women will run with it as though its a counter-culture statement. Men are stealing jobs from women! etc etc)
Ohhh. Now I get it. That's good.
Quote: (06-16-2014 08:15 AM)soup Wrote:
Start a twitter for shared public bathrooms as a feminist. That might get ridiculed.
Trannies are already doing that, and the feminists have to play along to not look intolerant.
That's probably the wrong way to go about it. They will simply check back on the activity of the account. If it's been dormant and then suddenly springs into life over a very specific feminist issue it telegraphs "troll" pretty loudly. You have to have some seemingly random, banal activity in there too. The objection to this entire strategy by others in this thread might actually turn out to be true. In order to pass for a chick, you'd need to engage in such large volumes of internet status whoring that it might end up dominating your life. Anyone posting fewer than seventeen selfies per hour would immediately be outed as being a straight male. At some level, women know women and they know who is not a woman. They would just keep throwing shibboleths at you until they got you. Or someone would want to confirm a video chat with you or something of the sort.
I'm still playing around with this idea in my head, but I suspect the better winning strategy might simply be exit over voice. Self-improvement, expatriation and moving money off shore. That's probably the only successful formula.
Another idea I have been toying with is a completely different persona. I'm thinking about an obnoxious 1%er who initially seems to be pro-leftist causes, but gradually outs himself as being like that to further his plans for world domination. He argues smashing the patriarchy, for instance, because smashing the patriarchy won't smash the 1%, but it will smash the middle class (both men and women), and is therefore a way of using the left to aid him in removing the only viable opposition to neo-feudalism. He could say, "I want to make everywhere like Brazil with its rich enclaves and its barrios." This creates a point of fracture within the left where they either have to become useful idiots against their own (Marxist) economic (and to a lesser extent, cultural) ends, or they have to argue against several leftist positions once they realise that they are being manipulated.
I think such a character would be far more viable than posing as a black lesbian activist. They'll out you pretty quickly as not being a black lesbian activist, but not nearly so easily as a 1%er. They would, of course, call you a fascist, but that's okay. You agree and amplify, and tell them that that still doesn't make them anything other than useful idiots.