Quote: (10-05-2013 03:04 PM)Roosh Wrote:
I welcome attention to my work, though it's unfortunate that they don't really want to have a conversation about it. I would have agreed to an interview with the Dissent writer. Instead, she just took quotes out of context to prove her existing agenda. The only way for my work to appear in the mainstream is if it's attacked without me being able to state my views. I've long accepted that.
"...to prove her existing agenda." You see it Roosh. This is their weakness.
I haven't posted my piece on Post-Industrialisation yet because I think it's part of a larger, more important salvo. I just have to get my ideas together in an easier-to-read style. My basic train of thought:
- In a post-industrial society, thought is considered to have monetary value above production.
- The ability to think untraditionally and creatively is what leads to innovation.
- The Universities are producing teaching uncreative thinkers, who parrot, not question, often with the added negative of destructive psychological issues that have been normalised via the victimhood championing of that enviroment.
- This style of thought is, therefore, has little to no monetary value in the workplace.
You don't take them down by proving they're racist, or using Twitter Drama.
You infuse business culture with the realisation there is little to no money to be made by these arrogant, uncreative thinkers, and you normalise the concept that mental fragility is destructive to the very process of successful business by roadblocking the unrestricted discussion of ideas without fear of censorship.
It's this girl writing an article on Roosh without bothering to get quotes from the man himself because she's already reduced the issue to Black and White and believes she is morally-superior.
It's the Beta Guy who writes an article for Business Insider on The Red Pill, who does a long interview with the moderator of r/theredpill then doesn't use any of it, because he's already reduced the issue to Black and White and believes he is morally-superior.
It's the Indian Writer who got Pax fired for his tweets, who then agrees to meet him, then follows it up with a snarky, supercilious post celebrating himself and learning nothing from the experience, because he's already reduced the issue to Black and White and believes he is morally-superior.
They've gone through University to emerge, flooded with arrogance that they believe they know exactly how the world works and that solipsism that the world change to match their worldview. This means they are fatally-blinkered to anything that challenges it, due to the fragility of their ego. They can't remotely entertain the possibility that they might not be right.
An
healthy mind is one that can investigate ideas it finds uncomfortable without its ego being driven into emotional turmoil.
An
intelligent mind can see multiple shade of grey between the extreme positions, and doesn't reduce an issue to one or the other.
A
innovate mind is constantly questioning and re-adapting its own belief system.
All else is stagnation. You want to hire Steve Jobs, not a herd thinker. Hence, the army of Gawker drones producing nothing but low quality-content that is designed to help Office Workers pass a couple of minutes in their day. Most of it can be produced by an uncurious girl sitting on her arse in front of a I-Mac browsing the internet, by either doing a story that basically just links to something she read on the net without building creatively on it, or spouted 'feelings' about what she 'knows' is right. All of this takes no effort or investigation whatsoever.
Their thought is utterly-worthless, except as turning over incrimental ad revenue through page views, but not interesting enough to *really* bring in the cash.
Who has more value to, say, the field of advertising. A feminist who says what women want whilst using cognitive dissonance to protect her ego from uncomfortable truths? Or Roosh, who could tell a client "They'll say they want this. They'll actually respond positively to this."
Am I rambling? Can you guys understand what I'm getting at?