Quote: (06-02-2012 06:30 PM)Richelieu Wrote:
Also, the other was a race thread asking if white guys had an advantage. In which you locked down. It definitely was not "race trolling" but a subject I hoped I could get perspective on. There are many threads on this forum started by obscure members on how to lay certain different races of women, yet someone brings up race in a way you don't appreciate , automatically the person gets pegged as a troll.
There are rules against newbies starting race threads. I don't make the rules, but I strongly agree with them. If you knew there are other race threads, you'd also know that your issue has been covered
ad naseum throughout the forum. The irony in all of this is that Roosh
himself banned your other accounts. This has nothing to do with you "bringing up race in a way
I don't like."
What's more, you've telegraphed your real, disingenuous intentions by dragging your beef out publicly, attacking me in the process (with your very first post). If you really wanted to just be a part of the group, you would have PM'd your concerns to Roosh or me, or just behaved yourself and hoped to not be detected. Instead, you decided to call me out, forcing me to respond publicly to a private matter.
Most guys around here understand that I'm a moderator around here--an extra set of eyes to keep things running smoothly--not some all-powerful god. I take that role seriously, and I'm fair and judicious with it. I'm also a contributing member; in fact, that's mostly what I am. Guys go head-up with me all the time, disagreeing me, getting heated with me, even clowning on me. I know how to keep the two hats I wear separate.
Remember that senior members are always going to get more leeway and benefit-of-the-doubt than a newbie. Senior members have put in countless hours and effort into helping others and improving the community. They've quite directly gotten other guys laid. So, if a guy like that--who has 3,500 posts to his name--makes a silly joke, or insults someone in a heated discussion, that's different than a guy with 19 starting inflammatory threads. Why is this hard to understand?
Quote: (06-02-2012 06:30 PM)Richelieu Wrote:
Also, the majority of my posts before any "trolling" were either neutral or added value (see: Forget Game...Fabricate Fame).
Before getting oversensitive over a post, please consider past behavior.
I didn't see much value in your threads, which consisted mostly of a subject line and an Internet link. That's my personal opinion, though. Others may disagree.
Quote:Quote:
This is no bigbootylvr
That may be the case, but I strongly suspect you're
several of the troll types wrapped into one (possibly including an IRT). I've spend a considerable amount of time explaining more than I probably needed to you.
I'm suspending your account pending Roosh's final decision--because there's a tiny chance you're just a confused newbie or beta. I've sent him a personal note about you (which is something you should have done your lazy-ass self). If you get banned, it's because he's decided for a third time that you're a troll.
I'm not optimistic for you because "banned member" usually means "banned member," not re-register in a month.