[Ringo]

(03-05-2012 06:47 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

I admit that I've gone through lazy-player™ phases where I didn't put it down the way I should. Some time last year, for instance--as the product of some chronic exhaustion and busy-ness--I half-assed a new bang (an SNL, actually). I could tell that the girl was disappointed afterward. But I confess that for much of my early years, even during healthy times, I was a medium-to-gentle fucker. (Was this beta?)

Lately, however, I've been putting it down like a champ, dropping the hammer on bitches relentlessly. The results have been very interesting. Girls have become a lot more insistent on seeking me out for additional bangs. They display a lot more DTF signs, such as a shameless willingness to come over to the house very late and on super-short notice. They bring up sex over text.

There are other behaviors too. After tossing this girl around during a spirited session--which including some light choking--this chick was all excited at the prospect of her parents seeing marks on her neck. She claimed to bruise easily. Another girl, this prudish, tough-nut-to-crack said I was "sexually aggressive." When I asked what she meant, she said that I was aggressive in pursuing sex and during the act. "You grab my wrists and pin me down." But, she was quick to add, "But I really liked it. You do it just right." That really drove the point home.

Now there's this OP story. I'm 100 percent convinced: if you're gentle-fucking girls, you're not tickling these deep-seeded appetites.

Exactly.

Honestly, I don't see how making love or fucking gently can allow you to produce huge amounts of pleasure. When I'm fucking a girl, I want her to remember me, how she had never been fucked like that before. I think that's when being aggressive really makes a difference. If you did a good job, they'll come back, guaranteed. Just remember not to leave any marks! That is, unless she asks for it.

From Roissy:

Quote:

XIV. Fuck her good
Fuck her like it’s your last fuck. And hers. Fuck her so good, so hard, so wantonly, so profligately that she is left a quivering, sparking mass of shaking flesh and sex fluids. Drain her of everything, then drain her some more. Kiss her all over, make love to her all night, and hold her close in the morning. Own her body, own her gratitude, own her love. If you don’t know how, learn to give her squirting orgasms.

[WesternCancer]

What about the girls who stop you as soon as you try to fuck them really hard and fast? I was with a girl once and I got into jackhammer positioning and started up, she wasnt having any of it and pushed me off, told me to go gentler. I put her on top of me and she starts riding me twice as hard as I was fucking her I thought my dick was going to break off. When I flipped her back over and went to doggy again she stopped me when I went hard/fast. So I flipped her on her back and just went deep/slow and she loved that shit, she actually came before I did.


Do you think something like that where she wants to be the one fucking hard is some kind of weird power thing, or are there just different levels or ways to fuck her rough. ie. you can still fuck hard but do it slowly.

[basil]

(03-05-2012 09:00 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Which nightclubs are you guys hanging out at where half the girls are hotter than these?

I'm glad you said it G, I don't get guys on here delighting in busting these women down a point or 5. Sure there may be better specimens out there, but unless they are in you bed why the need - it just makes you look like a poser. You guys would turn down these women? Come on, even if they were 5's youd still try your luck so you can say you banged a celeb.

[MikeCF]

These ratings threads are hilarious.

It's always the guys NEVER posting stories or data sheets doing the strict ranking.

You guys aren't fooling anyone - except, perhaps, yourselves.

[thegmanifesto]

(03-05-2012 11:50 PM)basil Wrote:  

(03-05-2012 09:00 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

Which nightclubs are you guys hanging out at where half the girls are hotter than these?

I'm glad you said it G, I don't get guys on here delighting in busting these women down a point or 5. Sure there may be better specimens out there, but unless they are in you bed why the need - it just makes you look like a poser. You guys would turn down these women? Come on, even if they were 5's youd still try your luck so you can say you banged a celeb.

Yeah, I was kind of hoping for a detailed list of nightclubs.

I will go out on a limb and put myself out there:

If either the redhead or the brunette is giving me a blower, I am giving that girl a 10.

Was this Beta?™ of me to say that?

(03-06-2012 12:13 AM)MikeCF Wrote:  

These ratings threads are hilarious.

It's always the guys NEVER posting stories or data sheets doing the strict ranking.

You guys aren't fooling anyone - except, perhaps, yourselves.

Yeah, they are pretty funny.

They remind me of the guy in the bar when you see the hottest girl in there and he says, "She's not that hot"

Implying that he has a line outside of his crib with hotter girls just waiting for a shot at him.

Yet the guy is too afraid to approach.

And if you dig deeper, you will find he was in a 4 year relationship with a girl who really was a "5".

And if you dig even deeper, he got slapped around by that girl and owned by her.

Not saying this about any of the members of this forum of course.

[Nonpareil]

=DELETE=

[soup]

I'd fuck her, no doubt, but Munn is definitely a "Butter-Body."

More importantly she comes off as try-hard in those photos, which means that there's probably something fishy going on with her.

She sucked on The Daily Show. I bet she sucks in bed (in a bad way). Not saying I wouldn't hit it, but, really, what's the big deal about her?

The other girls tit's are huge, which is good, but I'd definitely be looking for a thinner chick. My favorite thing about huge tits are when she's giving a blowjob and the tits are grazing my inner thighs.


Girls want to be dominated- they fucking love it when you grab the rough of the neck part of their hair (like you'd pick up a kitten). I sometimes walk around the street with my hand clasped around the back of their necks.

The ones that I've hooked up with don't want marks or hickies left. One girl wouldn't see me again after I choked her and left huge bruises on her neck. That said, I can tell her heart wasn't into the fuck so much anyway.

[Master Of My Own Kingdom]

For those involved in the game, women exhibiting that kind of behaviour is just normal procedure.

Business as usual.

Stuff like this provides for me an occasional reminder of the true nature of women. I must always remain vigilant and keep solid awareness.

[mikeymike]

a butter body, really? am I the only who thinks that body looks pretty good or what? I guess im wired different the big booty trend I hate, gimme white girl little small tight ass anytime over the big bubble ass. I like them athletic lean...

[soup]

You're right, she's not a straight-up butter body. It's just all that she doesn't live up to the hype, and her body isn't really that banging.

[mikeymike]

no its not the greatest body but its a tight body nonetheless, we've all done worse than that body and most of us better. I agree completely tho she doesnt live upto the hype, Ive never quite gotten it with this girl, yeah shes pretty, yeah the body is better than average but she's like I said a girl youd see workin at the mall, the girl from the mall youd bang but youd still see her there.

[MrXY]

(03-06-2012 12:13 AM)MikeCF Wrote:  

These ratings threads are hilarious.

It's always the guys NEVER posting stories or data sheets doing the strict ranking.

You guys aren't fooling anyone - except, perhaps, yourselves.

Yep.

Maybe all members should be required to post pics of the last 10 girls they have banged.

I bet the results would be very interesting

[scribblec]

(03-05-2012 09:32 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(03-05-2012 08:15 PM)Hencredible Casanova Wrote:  

That's precisely what I was getting at. I know you're black and seeing you advocate Neanderthal game was kind of a red flag. I can't imagine that working out too well for a brother in Ivy League type of environments. That's what I wanted you to elaborate on.

I think you can drop your opinion on that without compromising the integrity of this thread. Or, if you prefer, PM me.

Its cool, no risk in writing it out here.

The key difference with black guys (and, depending on place of origin, many hispanic guys) here is this: for them, social circle game is the end all and be all, their best option. The other key difference for them is that there are no real good options here, as even the best case scenario will usually return low yield.

Girls here are scared shitless of black guys. Some of the things I've seen (girls blatantly crossing the streets to avoid me, regularly double clutching upon catching sight of me, apologizing to me for even the slightest and most seemingly unoffensive things, etc) are absurd. This is tough, because it means the girls are uncomfortable around you from the get-go. Girls who aren't comfortable around obviously can't get intimate with you very easily. You're fighting uphill all the way.

Run caveman game, and you'll scare them away faster. I know-I've done it. You can't play by the same rules as other guys. You also can't drink as much.

By using social circles and getting pre-approved, you lessen some of their fear and give yourself a better shot, the best shot you will be able to get here. You've got to make a big investment to get this return, but it is your best option.

The catch? That shot is still not very good. I've known all Ivy linebackers in fraternities who, despite four years of consistent effort and the maintenance of much respect among their peers, could never get a white or asian girl here. I've known defensive backs who, despite being well known columnists and DJs on campus, still don't do very well on a regular basis when it comes to notches or even getting a girlfriend. I could go on with these examples-this is just one of those places where getting to white/asian girls (read: 90% of the populace) as a black/afro-hispanic dude is just not done a lot. They're just not receptive. Exceptions exist and I have known them personally, but they only serve to prove the rule.

Caveman works well for me everywhere else, though-all I need is a steady buzz (3-5 shots of vodka will do it), and I'm set, no problems. It is only here on campus that results are not forthcoming-caveman game fails, calm "good guy" game fails and social circle game, the best option, brings tiny yields if any. Just gotta chalk that up to the nature of the place-it is what it is.

Disclaimer: My Ivy may be worse than others in this regard. They're not all created equal.

i dont know why i keep reading that black guys are having trouble with white girls in america, in england white girls love black guys because they represent all those things you say scare american girls away. girls want the badboy image the guy who doesnt give a fuck i know white girls who specifically go for black guys even the ugly ones!

[Excelsior]

(03-06-2012 12:48 PM)scribblec Wrote:  

i dont know why i keep reading that black guys are having trouble with white girls in america, in england white girls love black guys because they represent all those things you say scare american girls away. girls want the badboy image the guy who doesnt give a fuck i know white girls who specifically go for black guys even the ugly ones!

Different histories, different cultural perceptions and stigmas, different challenges. Simple as that.

[Samseau]

(03-06-2012 12:13 AM)MikeCF Wrote:  

These ratings threads are hilarious.

It's always the guys NEVER posting stories or data sheets doing the strict ranking.

You guys aren't fooling anyone - except, perhaps, yourselves.

Seriously.

Hendricks: 8

Munn: 9

[insideasd]

Girls really do just want to be taken. I have been looking for a serious guide to rough sex for a while now,something that explains the psychology behind it. Surprisingly I have actually learned a lot from Rocco movies.

[Kitsune]

(03-06-2012 03:13 PM)insideasd Wrote:  

Girls really do just want to be taken. I have been looking for a serious guide to rough sex for a while now,something that explains the psychology behind it. Surprisingly I have actually learned a lot from Rocco movies.

Try The Sex God Method, by Dan Rose.

I found it covers all the bases. Dominance, Variety, Emotion and Intensity. Gives it step by step, with a big emphasis on psychologically affectng the girl.

[Timoteo]

(03-06-2012 02:14 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(03-06-2012 12:13 AM)MikeCF Wrote:  

These ratings threads are hilarious.

It's always the guys NEVER posting stories or data sheets doing the strict ranking.

You guys aren't fooling anyone - except, perhaps, yourselves.

Seriously.

Hendricks: 8

Munn: 9

This is how I see it for the most part, though I might pull Hendricks even with Munn. That might be confusing to some because they're both so different, but I find them both hot in their own way.

[Gmac]

See I would give Munn a 9, but Hendricks a 5.5. Not even a contest there to me. I just don't find the big pale saggy mom tits hot (deal breaker for me).

You can talk all the trash you want about people's "rating scales" but you don't know the kind of girls other guys are banging.

Me? I bang mostly 6's and 7's and the occasional 5. I'm completely fine with that, and it doesn't make my comment about the picture any less truthful. If I met Hendricks on the street I wouldn't know who she was, and knowing she's a celebrity doesn't make her any more attractive to me.

If anything, this thread makes it abundantly clear that the men here have distinctly different tastes. Try not to take it so personally next time Mike and G.

[thegmanifesto]

(03-06-2012 06:21 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

See I would give Munn a 9, but Hendricks a 5.5. Not even a contest there to me. I just don't find the big pale saggy mom tits hot (deal breaker for me).

You can talk all the trash you want about people's "rating scales" but you don't know the kind of girls other guys are banging.

Me? I bang mostly 6's and 7's and the occasional 5. I'm completely fine with that, and it doesn't make my comment about the picture any less truthful. If I met Hendricks on the street I wouldn't know who she was, and knowing she's a celebrity doesn't make her any more attractive to me.

If anything, this thread makes it abundantly clear that the men here have distinctly different tastes. Try not to take it so personally next time Mike and G.

Hell, I am just having a laugh.

Quote:

Me? I bang mostly 6's and 7's and the occasional 5.

This is my point.

Saying you bang the "occasional 5" could very well mean on here that you banged 75 Hollywood Starlets and 200 Singers here and there.

That is why I am still waiting for the detailed nightclub lists of where guys are hanging out where the brunette and redhead are rated a 5.

[Gmac]

(03-06-2012 06:32 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(03-06-2012 06:21 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

See I would give Munn a 9, but Hendricks a 5.5. Not even a contest there to me. I just don't find the big pale saggy mom tits hot (deal breaker for me).

You can talk all the trash you want about people's "rating scales" but you don't know the kind of girls other guys are banging.

Me? I bang mostly 6's and 7's and the occasional 5. I'm completely fine with that, and it doesn't make my comment about the picture any less truthful. If I met Hendricks on the street I wouldn't know who she was, and knowing she's a celebrity doesn't make her any more attractive to me.

If anything, this thread makes it abundantly clear that the men here have distinctly different tastes. Try not to take it so personally next time Mike and G.

Hell, I am just having a laugh.

Quote:

Me? I bang mostly 6's and 7's and the occasional 5.

This is my point.

Saying you bang the "occasional 5" could very well mean on here that you banged 75 Hollywood Starlets and 200 Singers here and there.

I guess so. It also means there are a ton of women out there who I haven't touched that I deem much higher in quality. It may also mean that I tend to take the chicks I am banging for granted... to my benefit of course.

[scorpio]

There is a disturbing consistency on RVF to trash women's looks. I'm against pedestalizing them, but your credibility takes a hit when you call pretty girls average and beautiful girls barely pretty. Everyone has a good idea of the range a chick falls in even if they may not agree on the exact number.

Beyond the simple boner test, I think a number system is useful because it is a pretty good gauge for how much effort you'll have to take to nail a certain girl. I've been at this long enough to know that if you're putting in the effort for a "6" that you would for a "9," something is wrong. Or if you think the energy taken to take down a dime should be the same as a seven, you're unrealistic.

I bang whoever gives me the best ROI.

[thegmanifesto]

What would this girl be?

A 2?

Maybe pushing a 3?

Like if you were on that beach, you would "maybe hit it"?

If she was in a bar you "might approach her"?

You "maybe" would let her use the shower in your apartment to wash off if she begged and pleaded?

[Kona]

(03-06-2012 06:36 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

What would this girl be?

A 2?

Maybe pushing a 3?

Well come on she's got sand all over her.

Aloha!

[Gmac]

(03-06-2012 06:36 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

What would this girl be?

A 2?

Maybe pushing a 3?

Like if you were on that beach, you would "maybe hit it"?

If she was in a bar you "might approach her"?

As usual you take your example to the extreme to try to prove your point. You get no reply from me. My scale is mine alone and it is what it is.