[TravelerKai]

(05-03-2017 10:57 AM)kaotic Wrote:  

(05-03-2017 10:51 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(05-03-2017 10:29 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

Guys here must be banging supermodel-level 9s and 10s if they're "turned off" by this chick's chubby arms.

You think that's bad? Go look at that thread for that West Virginia state legislator girl that is getting shitted on still, all because she has a cutesy chimpmunk like face. Dudes in there talking about doggy style only and paper bags, when her body is even better than this chick in this thread.

Most agreed they WB but she's a butterface

How is a chick a 6 and a butterface? That's the prettiest butterface I have ever seen. So she does not have a thin nose. Dudes are still saying she is a 6. Butterfaces are always 5 and below.

That shit makes no sense at all. Guys are just being hardasses, like back when Tuthmosis was going to war with nearly half of the forum that was calling a top level porn star a 5 or 6, when the chick is technically a borderline 9. It was that chick with the hoolahoop and those mean legs. I have never been that guy to call out others and demand pics of what they bang, but it's getting annoying enough to start doing it.

There is not a alot to like on the chick in the video, but she isn't lower than a 6. Fake tits or not. Her arms could be tightened up sure, but let's be real here. If she was making this fool homemade biscuits naked in high heels, and cleaning his house with a toothbrush, most of you would nod your heads in approval and chime in with WB. You just see these WNB, because she is a disgusting golddiggin cunt, a major crime in the Manosphere.