Quote: (06-16-2017 10:28 AM)Thriver Wrote:
Quote: (06-12-2017 07:41 PM)tom Wrote:
Quote: (06-12-2017 05:36 PM)Thriver Wrote:
Vikings were more or less blonde gypsies.
Never managed to create something valuable.
William the Conqueror, King Rurik and Oleg of Novogorad would disagree with that.
In general Vikings were just useless savages that were not efficient even in war
Have to stop you there.
Vikings were martial arts geniuses, genius armorers and weapons crafters, and excellent battle tacticians.
Their steel forging techniques were WAAAAY ahead of it's time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulfberht_swords
Their Dane Axe's were extremely clever for the times.
Doubling as a tool when not at war, when it was time for battle it was a deadly weapon. Notice in that photo, they would use that long pole to reach past their enemy's shield defense and split skulls. In a battle this would absolutely fuck the enemy's front line and demoralize them causing them to reel backwards into their rear line. Even if the enemy was wearing a helmet, that axe would still split the face. Absolutely brutal! They would hook/sweep feet with that axe, then follow up high. These guys had mad skills.
These guys used kicks, elbows, trip/sweeps, shields and multiple types of weapons to win fights. The were not some barbaric people in the way you suggest. They were very intelligent people. Not all that much different from other warrior cultures like the Zulu, Scythians, The Huns, etc. Each group were innovators in something related to combat.
They were the best mercenaries in the world at one point because of their battlefield skill. You cannot last long as a merc if you tend to die like raw meat in a grinder.
You need to join a HEMAA or ARMA class or seminar and learn how people from those times, etc. fought and learn about the weaponry. All this imagery of anyone not Roman Empire, as barbarians with swashbuckling fighting skills reeks of ignorance. Go get some knowledge and check out their history on a combat level.
All that aside, is anyone willing to show some proof that Dave Chapelle is a BN? If he is one, that is news to me. I'm surprised no one called the OP out for that already. Just because dude is a Muslim does not mean that he is a BN. If he was, I don't think he would be with a Filipino woman for a wife. That highly contradicts Pan Afrocentric thinking which is core to BN ideology. I even question how much of a Muslim he really is on top of that, but that's outside the scope of the thread.
Dating Guide for Mainland China Datasheet
TravelerKai's Martial Arts Datasheet
1 John 4:20 - If anyone says, I love God, and hates (detests, abominates) his brother [in Christ], he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, Whom he has not seen.