Quote: (06-16-2015 08:49 AM)General Stalin Wrote:
Bask in the degeneracy. We live in a time where you can be told to leave a public playground because children are around and you aren't responsible for any of them so you're probably a pedophile, but you're shamed if you don't support the sexualization of children. It's okay if they're gay? I think that's the message.
Any perceived historical injustices/oppression has to be paid back in dividends by giving the respective demographic a leg up and a "free pass" to do whatever the fuck hey want and turn the other cheek.
You make an incredibly perceptive (and very disturbing) point, comrade.
According to the 'progressive' narrative:
Single man = Predator. To be despised. Monitor. Ostracise. Assume the worst. Keep away from kids. Especially if straight, white, and, in the jargon, 'cis'.
Two homos looking to adopt(!) = Heroic. To be celebrated. Paragons of virtue; superior, in fact, to man and wife in traditional marriage (and inconvenient evidence contradicting this assertion shall be ignored or suppressed). Any questioning of their
right to gain access to children - let alone any expression of disapproval, mild discomfiture, or even indifference at the prospect - is
hate, and will not be [Ha!] tolerated.
This isn't a subject I particularly like to dwell on, but it's an astonishing situation when, in the context of caregiving for children, a lone straight male is looked at as practically evil incarnate (and a man and woman in a stable relationship not much better), yet two or more gay males (never mind notoriously violent, abusive dykes) are considered saints...
You said it, Jackie.