[Wadsworth]

Yes, McCoy, there is alot to dislike about the Manosphere. The whole thing has its pathologies, but it also has some very valid points to make, and I'm glad it exists. Having argued with feminists before, and knowing what that's like, I want there to be a counterbalancing force against them in society.

Why can't you just explore it to the extent that you want to figure out what it's about, and keep at an arms length that which you find personally offensive?

It's not a sorority, if you don't want to be part of it anymore just stop posting.

[2Wycked]

(04-30-2015 01:37 PM)Enigma Wrote:  

(04-30-2015 01:05 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

This thread isn't going in the direction I was hoping for.

Might as well tackle some issues

1)The manosphere is a stupid concept. If you don't like feminism that's chill (I do) but the manosphere is the exact same thing that many of you claim to hate but for men. No one sees the hypocrisy?

2)there is no red pill blue pill. Other than creating an "us" vs "them" mentally its just a marketing ploy

3) Yes, okay I get it I should have just logged out but I feel terrible about having previously ever associated myself here which is why I would just prefer a ban. Wouldn't it be rude to just leave and not say bye?


I mean the least I could have after hanging here is a final request ban request (approved), like Hencredible

"Thanks everyone for helping me turn around my life, but everything you think is wrong and I regret ever being associated with you"

If someone with almost 1,500 posts here thinks like this, imagine what some of the lurkers are like.

He could've easily exposed the identity of one of the members he communicated with privately in fit of feminine anger.

(well, insight of the thread)

I have a relevant article on ROK: Never Break Bread With The Ungrateful.

There are serious maturity issues at play here.

As generous as the community is with their advice, time and energy, we aren't robots. We have our own lives. To take so much from this community and then piss all over us is the epitome of ungrateful behavior.

[bacan]

Also on #teamnoban

McCoy quit being a little bitch.

And the skeptical roosh from the fat shaming show posted by skeptical roosh in response to a poster who is skeptical of fat shaming was amazing... Even funnier that roosh ignored his ban request.

[Fast Eddie]

We now know Bruce Jenner's transformation is complete.

[Que enspastic]

LM McCoy is being a little bitch. No Ban.

This is the same as trying to take your own life on death row. It can't be done. It's not your ban to take. You'll be kept alive and safe for now.

[AnonymousBosch]

(04-30-2015 02:41 PM)Wadsworth Wrote:  

Yes, McCoy, there is alot to dislike about the Manosphere society. The whole thing The entire societal construct of modern life has its pathologies, is pathological.

Fixed.

I've liked your posts in the past LM, and am sorry to see you leave, but I doubt you're going to find any trace of sense and rightness anywhere else.

I assuming someone with power over you found you reading the site, and a line through your name will be evidence you're attempting to publicly mea culpa, otherwise you'd just wander away.

[Sooth]

Imagine if a member of one of those feminist echo chamber forums started a similar thread.

They would probably all want the member booted as a traitor, rather than try convince them to stay because they know it's best for them.

[MMX2010]

(04-30-2015 02:57 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Fixed.

I've liked your posts in the past LM, and am sorry to see you leave, but I doubt you're going to find any trace of sense and rightness anywhere else.

We are the sense of rightness, Bosch. It has always been us.

When McCoy is finished wandering in the wilderness, he'll realize that we've always been the sense of rightness. (Otherwise, the wilderness will just destroy him.)

[Roosh]

LM McCoy will not be banned.

[Cr33pin]

(04-30-2015 03:04 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

LM McCoy will not be banned.

The merciful hath spoken

[OGNorCal707]

(04-30-2015 01:23 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

(04-30-2015 01:05 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

1)The manosphere is a stupid concept. If you don't like feminism that's chill (I do) but the manosphere is the exact same thing that many of you claim to hate but for men. No one sees the hypocrisy?

If you really supported feminism, you'd be in the kitchen right now helping your girlfriend make a sammich for her other boyfriend.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

I truly wonder here.

There are so many guys who get banned against their own will and here you have someone who wishes to get banned, but avoids doing all those things that the others did to successfully accomplish that great task.

If you truly desired to get banned you would just come out guns blazing starting so much bullshit that the mods would be forced to ban you. But here you are still remaining courteous and nice trying to feebly stir some commotion.

[Slim Shady]

He declared himself a feminist. Isn't that the ultimate bannable offense?

[Days of Broken Arrows]

Here is a link to the forum rules, posted back in 2011.

If anyone wants to get banned, it's easy: violate the rules. I almost did this accidentally in a post last week where we were discussing Sandra Bullock being voted People's sexiest woman and I noted that Bella Thorne would have been a better choice, but held off posting pics when I pulled up the rules and read...

9. No jailbait/illegal threads. Do not talk about where to find girls under 18 or how to have sex with them, even if it's legal in the location being discussed. Also do not post sexy pictures of girls that are confirmed to be under 18.

[OGNorCal707]

(04-30-2015 03:14 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

He declared himself a feminist. Isn't that the ultimate bannable offense?

I'm kind of onboard with the thinking that it's possible an angry girlfriend of male feminist roommate has hacked dudes account, honestly it would be easy as shit, just leave your computer unattended with rooshvforum in your computer history, as long as your still logged in someone could be posting under your name and how would we know any different? I used to kind of worry because my ex was living with me and I always had my computer on with rooshvforum as one of my main bookmarked sites , she could've got onto the forum at any time.

[Fortis]

McCoy, everybody, this is just silly.

[heavy]

Theories:

1. His mom/wife/gf caught him. She wants to see proof that his identity is killed and cremated into fine ashes as a mere kiln of the past. She'll continue checking the history on his devices until at some point, he buys a burner smartphone and finds his way back to the holy land of RVF.
Somewhat possible

2. Roosh's alter-ego. Roosh will begin using McCoy as the blue pill perspective. The purpose is multi-faceted. Taking the identity of an opponent may offer great insight as to strategies and tactics. Add in the humor a feminist would bring to the table (only 1 of them wouldn't really taint the crowd much), as well as the entertainment aspect. Plus, now we all know who McCoy is, so Roosh has two identities on here with fame.
Not likely

3. He's telling the truth. It's taken me well over a year to have nearly the same number of posts he has, and I can't understand running from God's wrath that long only to want one more glimpse Sodom and Gomorrah. But he has a different background and experiences, so maybe this is what he needs. Perhaps he's Elijah and needs to spend some time in the wilderness.
Likely

4. (edit) Angry wife/gf broke into account. Per OGNorCal707, this could be, not sure. Thread started roughly 12 hours ago. Entirely possible for the real McCoy to be unaware that long.
Likely

In any case, good luck.

[AnonymousBosch]

(04-30-2015 03:03 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(04-30-2015 02:57 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Fixed.

I've liked your posts in the past LM, and am sorry to see you leave, but I doubt you're going to find any trace of sense and rightness anywhere else.

We are the sense of rightness, Bosch. It has always been us.

When McCoy is finished wandering in the wilderness, he'll realize that we've always been the sense of rightness. (Otherwise, the wilderness will just destroy him.)

Damn straight we are.

My point more was, yes, of course the Manosphere has its groupthink, demonised outgroups, issues and pathologies. I've done a lot of soul searching over this at times myself, but the reality is, so will any group in society LM choses to interact with.

He could be describing a group of friends, local government, a workout crew, a band, an office workplace or a sports team.

Any group of people he chooses to associate with in the future will have a demonised out-group it needs to feel superior too to strengthen group unity. There will be certain beliefs - frequently illogical or hypocritical - he will need to hold to remain part of the group, at risk of expulsion.

It's simply how tribes work. It's not always about skin colour.

A Leftist Friend, posting on FB recently: "Ugh, can you still believe that people still think this way [about race] in 2015?" I wanted to reply: "Ugh, can you still believe that people still believe in tribal unity in 2015", he said, showing his clear, unquestioned allegiance to his tribe of upper-middle class liberals from rich communities that are over 97.8% White but nevertheless make a constant show of Not Being Racist. (And I've checked out the census demographics of the towns on all of these tools on my FB: 97.8% was the least-homogenous population).

What LM is trying to escape is everywhere: hypocrisy, stereotyping, pathology. Given that choice, I'd err on the side of Neomasculinity every time, particularly as I'm damn fond of my balls.

As I grow older, my core beliefs about life have changed due to experience and research, and, as such, I'm more convinced I'm right about any topic I've seriously-considered, whilst also being less-convinced that I know everything. It's a good place to be in mid-life.

[TheWastelander]

(04-30-2015 03:23 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

Here is a link to the forum rules, posted back in 2011.

If anyone wants to get banned, it's easy: violate the rules. I almost did this accidentally in a post last week where we were discussing Sandra Bullock being voted People's sexiest woman and I noted that Bella Thorne would have been a better choice, but held off posting pics when I pulled up the rules and read...

9. No jailbait/illegal threads. Do not talk about where to find girls under 18 or how to have sex with them, even if it's legal in the location being discussed. Also do not post sexy pictures of girls that are confirmed to be under 18.

[SVK]

L M McCoy, just change your password to a random string that you won't remember (make sure the browser won't save it) , you'll be effectively banned from posting without all this BS.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Can I have your stuff?

[kaotic]

(04-30-2015 03:52 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Can I have your stuff?

Dibs on his rep points !

[AnonymousBosch]

^ I'll take his notch count.

[Akula]

McCoy this is just silly and accomplishes nothing. You haven't even broadly spelled out what's so upsetting to you and why after all this time you're doing a 180 and want to leave us. I hate to say this but it's sort of like how a feminist or SJW would act - you're effectively blocking people who mostly want to help you out in search of your personal "safe space" so you don't get any triggering events. Not a way to build character.

Give us something to work with here so we can at least see what your biggest issues are. You and all of us might learn something in the process.

In the meantime...

[MMM]

Time to shut down this drama lama thread. Nothing to see here, move on.