Quote: (01-28-2015 03:12 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Quote: (01-27-2015 09:12 PM)Renzy Wrote:
New All-Female 'Ghostbusters' Cast Chosen
This is really fucked up - not only is it terrible demographic-terms, but it is only serving feminist SJW causes.
Why the fuck cast men at all in anything except bad guys and sexy boy toys? Give it a break already and eliminate all men - make it all about girl moxy, so that men can finally ditch the whole Hollywood crap once and for all. Let the shrieking idiots watch their idiotic all-female casts.
All I see in this line up is one woman I would have sex with and two landwhales that you couldn't pay me to have sex with and one dried-up hussy who you couldn't pay me to have sex with.
If you're going to desecrate a sacred movie, at least go in a Charlie's Angels direction and fill the screen with sexible poon.
One recent prime example of a movie with a unrealistic plot that could have been salvaged with a hot and occasionally naked female lead is
Non-Stop.
In this film, instead of getting an attractive female lead, we get one who looks like to ran into the wall face first.
Despite the Daily Mail claiming that 53-year old Julianne Moore looked like a woman half her age at the film's premiere, the photo accompanying the article suggests otherwise.
All that I can see, is that even with plenty of money for plastic surgery and make-up artists, she still can't pass as even a 40 year old.
As a final kick in the balls to men everywhere, the conclusion of the movie suggests that Grandma Moore is the sort of woman that a man with all the dark triad potential of Liam Neeson should be happy to have in his life.
No, sorry. Liam Neeson should be sticking his dick in a 24-year old hottie known for her tight pussy and a history of poor judgment.