[quote]
(04-04-2014 02:21 AM)spalex Wrote:
First, my girlfriend told me stories from her hometown (in north-eastern Poland), that all the older people in her town tell about the jews.
That is that in the 1900's up until WW2. Jewish communities would move into their small towns, not integrate and basically bankrupt everyone else by destroying their business' through competition. Then the jews would eventually control everything.
I was also told stories about this town in WW2 where, when the Germans came marching through looking for jews, the locals would hide them out in the forest and in all sorts of places, resist torture to keep them safe.
But then when the front changed and the Russians came marching down the road. The locals went into hiding and the jews just gave them up straight away.
There are lots of stories like this. I assumed most of it is propaganda.[/quote]
Whether or not it is propaganda, you can witness it happening in modern society.
The clearest example is the United States sending 3 billion dollars annually to Israel no questions asked without any clear return on the payment. Anytime U.S. leadership questions the motives of Israel leadership, they are called out as anti-Semitic.
Another good example is the growth of Jewish presence at Ivy league universities
to the exclusion of non-Jewish white men. This was brought up by scorpion.
[quote]
(03-01-2014 08:28 PM)scorpion Wrote:
Ron Unz (a Jew) had
a really good article awhile back looking at Ivy League enrollment statistics. His conclusion was that Jews were massively overrepresented relative to their academic performance, which has been declining in recent years relative to whites and Asians. Given the enormous importance of the Ivy League pedigree for jump starting a successful career in academia, banking, government and media, it becomes clear how Jewish networking/nepotism in the Ivy League over the past several decades has given an enormous boost to Jewish influence in the country, especially relative to other minority groups.
Basically, Jews are receiving preferential Ivy League admissions relative to all other ethnic groups, despite being the most successful and privileged ethnic group in the country. What's happening is that Jews are being categorized as "white" for admissions purposes, so in an incoming class that is 50% "white" total, 25% might be WASPs and 25% Jews, a 1:1 ratio, despite whites being over 50% of the population and Jews 2%. So in this manner Jews can both displace whites from the Ivy League and increase their own numbers at the same time, largely under the radar.
This is easily accomplished simply by favoring applications from Jewish students (which can be easily identified by traditional Jewish surnames and/or involvement with Jewish clubs/organizations) over those of similarly qualified whites. Since Jews count as "whites" for admissions purposes, nothing seems amiss on the surface. This is exactly the sort of thing you would expect to happen if Jews were inclined to engage in extreme levels of ethnic networking/favoritism as I suggested earlier.
[quote=Ron Unz]The evidence of the recent NMS semifinalist lists seems the most conclusive of all, given the huge statistical sample sizes involved. As discussed earlier, these students constitute roughly the highest 0.5 percent in academic ability, the top 16,000 high school seniors who should be enrolling at the Ivy League and America’s other most elite academic universities. In California, white Gentile names outnumber Jewish ones by over 8-to-1; in Texas, over 20-to-1; in Florida and Illinois, around 9-to-1. Even in New York, America’s most heavily Jewish state, there are more than two high-ability white Gentile students for every Jewish one. Based on the overall distribution of America’s population, it appears that approximately 65–70 percent of America’s highest ability students are non-Jewish whites, well over ten times the Jewish total of under 6 percent.
Needless to say, these proportions are considerably different from what we actually find among the admitted students at Harvard and its elite peers, which today serve as a direct funnel to the commanding heights of American academics, law, business, and finance.
Based on reported statistics, Jews approximately match or even outnumber non-Jewish whites at Harvard and most of the other Ivy League schools, which seems wildly disproportionate. Indeed, the official statistics indicate that non-Jewish whites at Harvard are America’s most under-represented population group, enrolled at a much lower fraction of their national population than blacks or Hispanics, despite having far higher academic test scores.
When examining statistical evidence, the proper aggregation of data is critical. Consider the ratio of the recent 2007–2011 enrollment of Asian students at Harvard relative to their estimated share of America’s recent NMS semifinalists, a reasonable proxy for the high-ability college-age population, and compare this result to the corresponding figure for whites. The Asian ratio is 63 percent, slightly above the white ratio of 61 percent, with both these figures being considerably below parity due to the substantial presence of under-represented racial minorities such as blacks and Hispanics, foreign students, and students of unreported race. Thus, there appears to be no evidence for racial bias against Asians, even excluding the race-neutral impact of athletic recruitment, legacy admissions, and geographical diversity.
However, if we separate out the Jewish students, their ratio turns out to be 435 percent, while the residual ratio for non-Jewish whites drops to just 28 percent, less than half of even the Asian figure. As a consequence,
Asians appear under-represented relative to Jews by a factor of seven, while non-Jewish whites are by far the most under-represented group of all, despite any benefits they might receive from athletic, legacy, or geographical distribution factors. The rest of the Ivy League tends to follow a similar pattern, with
the overall Jewish ratio being 381 percent, the Asian figure at 62 percent, and the ratio for non-Jewish whites a low 35 percent, all relative to their number of high-ability college-age students.
Just as striking as these wildly disproportionate current numbers have been the longer enrollment trends. In the three decades since I graduated Harvard,
the presence of white Gentiles has dropped by as much as 70 percent, despite no remotely comparable decline in the relative size or academic performance of that population; meanwhile, the percentage of Jewish students has actually increased. This period certainly saw a very rapid rise in the number of Asian, Hispanic, and foreign students, as well as some increase in blacks. But it seems rather odd that all of these other gains would have come at the expense of whites of Christian background, and none at the expense of Jews.
Furthermore, the Harvard enrollment changes over the last decade have been even more unusual when we compare them to changes in the underlying demographics. Between 2000 and 2011, the relative percentage of college-age blacks enrolled at Harvard dropped by 18 percent, along with declines of 13 percent for Asians and 11 percent for Hispanics, while only whites increased, expanding their relative enrollment by 16 percent. However, this is merely an optical illusion: in fact,
the figure for non-Jewish whites slightly declined, while the relative enrollment of Jews increased by over 35 percent, probably reaching the highest level in Harvard’s entire history. Thus, the relative presence of Jews rose sharply while that of all other groups declined, and this occurred during exactly the period when the once-remarkable academic performance of Jewish high school students seemed to suddenly collapse.[/quote]
The resentment that Christian (European for the atheists) men have held towards the Jewish community over the millennia was not formed out of thin air.
It always ends up being a one way flow of resources from the Christian community to the Jewish community and that is where the resentment starts.