I found this on a blog that is seeking to get more guys out of "The Game" sorta speak. Thoughts?
http://www.practicalpickup.com/the-guide-to-a-pua-detox
http://www.practicalpickup.com/the-guide-to-a-pua-detox
PUA Detox
Quote: (11-30-2010 05:05 AM)IshGibbor Wrote:
I found this on a blog that is seeking to get more guys out of "The Game" sorta speak. Thoughts?
http://www.practicalpickup.com/the-guide-to-a-pua-detox
This is entropy's blog, I think.
Great material. I followed his day game routine/stacks to a tee and they worked great for me in Philly.
Quote: (11-30-2010 03:39 PM)speakeasy Wrote:
Quote: (11-30-2010 05:09 AM)Badstuber Wrote:
Why would anyone go out of 'the game'?
Sounds like his overall point is getting away from game techniques and just learning how to be more of a man with natural charisma and a life. That's how I took it.
Exactly, getting out of the game meaning stop being so damn analytical and just go with the flow and escalate.
Quote: (12-01-2010 02:10 AM)Roosh Wrote:
Oh really??
Yes.
My rationale is based on a theory that "game" is basically a set of rules one needs to follow to get laid. People learn those rules, and play by them. They're getting chicks.
Since they play by rules, they do not act the way they naturally would. For example, someone, who really is a jealous control freak, learns to play a laid-back dude who doesn't give shit. He doesn't become a laid-back dude, he just plays one. And this works in short time.
However it changes once the person gets into LTR. One cannot play by rules 24/7 trying to hide his true nature. This means a dude, who is control freak, will pretty soon reveal his "control freak" nature, and since the girl was attracted to a completely different "laid-back" type, his relationship is over. Anyone who has ever been in an LTR can confirm that it is simply impossible to follow checklists all the time, and most secrets are out quite fast. This is why I'm always saying using game will give you a lot of easy lays, but it won't help you in LTR.
Now what if the dude didn't play any games, and just showed his true control freak nature? Indeed, he'd probably get significantly less girls. But there is someone for everyone, and those he'd get would be attracted to his control freak nature, or at least accept it. In this case he doesn't need to play anything, and at least he has a chance to turn it into LTR.
Quote: (12-01-2010 04:49 AM)oldnemesis Wrote:
Quote: (12-01-2010 02:10 AM)Roosh Wrote:
Oh really??
Yes.
My rationale is based on a theory that "game" is basically a set of rules one needs to follow to get laid. People learn those rules, and play by them. They're getting chicks.
Since they play by rules, they do not act the way they naturally would. For example, someone, who really is a jealous control freak, learns to play a laid-back dude who doesn't give shit. He doesn't become a laid-back dude, he just plays one. And this works in short time.
However it changes once the person gets into LTR. One cannot play by rules 24/7 trying to hide his true nature. This means a dude, who is control freak, will pretty soon reveal his "control freak" nature, and since the girl was attracted to a completely different "laid-back" type, his relationship is over. Anyone who has ever been in an LTR can confirm that it is simply impossible to follow checklists all the time, and most secrets are out quite fast. This is why I'm always saying using game will give you a lot of easy lays, but it won't help you in LTR.
Now what if the dude didn't play any games, and just showed his true control freak nature? Indeed, he'd probably get significantly less girls. But there is someone for everyone, and those he'd get would be attracted to his control freak nature, or at least accept it. In this case he doesn't need to play anything, and at least he has a chance to turn it into LTR.
But what if you're not interested in a LTR?
Quote: (12-01-2010 04:49 AM)oldnemesis Wrote:
Quote: (12-01-2010 02:10 AM)Roosh Wrote:
Oh really??
Yes.
My rationale is based on a theory that "game" is basically a set of rules one needs to follow to get laid. People learn those rules, and play by them. They're getting chicks.
Since they play by rules, they do not act the way they naturally would. For example, someone, who really is a jealous control freak, learns to play a laid-back dude who doesn't give shit. He doesn't become a laid-back dude, he just plays one. And this works in short time.
However it changes once the person gets into LTR. One cannot play by rules 24/7 trying to hide his true nature. This means a dude, who is control freak, will pretty soon reveal his "control freak" nature, and since the girl was attracted to a completely different "laid-back" type, his relationship is over. Anyone who has ever been in an LTR can confirm that it is simply impossible to follow checklists all the time, and most secrets are out quite fast. This is why I'm always saying using game will give you a lot of easy lays, but it won't help you in LTR.
Now what if the dude didn't play any games, and just showed his true control freak nature? Indeed, he'd probably get significantly less girls. But there is someone for everyone, and those he'd get would be attracted to his control freak nature, or at least accept it. In this case he doesn't need to play anything, and at least he has a chance to turn it into LTR.
Excellent point, being in a relationship is one of the few areas in life where your weaknesses as a person will get exposed pronto. If there is one thing I like about LTRs, it is the fact the cracks in my armor are exposed a lot quicker with someone there who is in a relationship with me. It gives me the opportunity to see them and work on them once they are exposed.
Quote: (12-01-2010 05:38 AM)Badstuber Wrote:
But what if you're not interested in a LTR?
Fair question. If you're not interested in a LTR, then there seems to be no other reason for you to get out of "the game".
However, in this case you might want to assess your long-term plans. Are you still going to spend majority of your time to game chicks when you're 50? Will it still be a priority?
If game teaches you to pretend to be something you are not then you have been listening to a really shitty teacher.
Quote: (11-30-2010 03:39 PM)speakeasy Wrote:
Sounds like his overall point is getting away from game techniques and just learning how to be more of a man with natural charisma and a life. That's how I took it.
This.
I wrote the article. It has nothing to do with not hitting on girls anymore. It has everything to do with guys who get so clogged up with studying theory and over-analizing everything that they don't even know what to do. It's a way for guys to undo their analysis-paralysis, which has become too common in the PUA community.
The comment about LTR's is interesting. I've found that there are a number of qualities that make you good at pick up that will hurt you in an LTR, as well as a number of traits that make you a good boyfriend that will hurt you in pick up.
But I would say, in general, most things that make you good at picking up girls (dominance, confidence, empathizing, humor, flirting) will make any serious relationship that much better. Pick up has definitely made my relationships much, much better.
Quote: (12-02-2010 02:29 AM)Entropy4 Wrote:
But I would say, in general, most things that make you good at picking up girls (dominance, confidence, empathizing, humor, flirting) will make any serious relationship that much better.
If those things are integral part of your character, then yes.
But if those things are NOT part of your character and you just pretend having them (which is part of game) - then no.
Quote: (12-02-2010 06:35 PM)oldnemesis Wrote:
Quote: (12-02-2010 02:29 AM)Entropy4 Wrote:
But I would say, in general, most things that make you good at picking up girls (dominance, confidence, empathizing, humor, flirting) will make any serious relationship that much better.
If those things are integral part of your character, then yes.
But if those things are NOT part of your character and you just pretend having them (which is part of game) - then no.
I agree with that.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)