Quote: (10-30-2013 05:00 PM)Enigma Wrote:
Quote: (10-29-2013 04:47 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:
I don't hear any intelligence in his music, but modern software doing all the work. It's all cut and pasted loops, parts sampled from other songs, and cliched effects selected from drop down menus. It's as lazy and effortless as it sounds. His previous overuse of Autotune made sense. Drag and drop. If people want to think that's genius, that's cool, but I suspect his genius requires a laptop in the way Prince wouldn't. Admittedly, I haven't heard the new one.
Can we get a data sheet on this?
I mean, if I can just download Pro Tools and effortlessly drag and drop my way to a music career, break that shit down for me.
I see this argument all over the internet. Some people hate Hip Hop so much that they all regurgitate this tired sentiment based on a distorted perception.
The KLF already did it:
And, no, West is going to constantly claim his Genius, then I'm going to analyse what I'm hearing. It's no Homebrew or Duck Rock.
You're making the false assumption I'm dismissing
all Rap and Hip-Hop, based on not recognising Genius in West's music, with the added implication that this is racially-based. By this logic, because I refuse to recognise Genius in the music of Nirvana for much the same reasons (lack of effort in the writing, simplistic melodies and not trying to push the boundaries to elevate material), I also hate all rock music and white people.
Admittedly, I dislike harmonic stasis and repetition in classical music. The eighties work of Michael Nyman frustrates me, no end, though he's dramatic enough that he's begging to be sampled and integrated into rap music.
All art isn't equal, though I'll admit it's so largely-personal and subjective that it's impossible to reach consensus on what is great and what isn't. If Kayne does it for you, great, but I simply want more than what he's offering, and don't hear Genius in the arrangement, based on 35+ years of arranging music, and knowing how easy computers make thing having used them for years: I just note the rote nature of machines, and hear lost opportunities to add aural and harmonic interest and strengthen the material through certain arrangement tricks, much in the way the rock music of Nickleback leaves me wanting more.
I make my critical decisions based on personal experience and arrangement knowledge, and understand just how easy computers make this sort of thing. For example, a friend asked me a while back how to fit a sample of a bad 80's song 'Rush Hour' into a track he was doing, and he just couldn't make it work. My advice was to treat the Em drone of the track as being a relative minor to the sample's key: pitch it to G Major.
I was in a hotel room with only a lap top, thought "Songs with Em drones, what's on the computer.... Shep Pettibone's Remix of West End Girls, Eleanor Rigby" and had cut loops out the mp3's, played them together in Ableton Live, then cut and repitched 'Rush Hour', dropped it in, then threw in a filtered guitar riff from REM's The One I Love just because.
Less than 3 minutes later, I can show him
proof of concept, and he calls me a 'lifesaver'.
I did build that into a full track for my own amusement -fuck knows where it is now - but this is without any timestretching or production which would have smoothed it out.
Knowing the simplicity and automation of the process is why I don't respect this kind of thing. I was into sampling when John Oswald was getting sued for his Plunderphonics series and the Latin Rascals knew how to use a razor to cut inches of tape knowing exactly how long it would translate to in beats per minute, and that kind of
audio terrorism (and I'd include record scratching in this) was dirty, thrilling and exciting. Dragging and dropping loops is
middle class and corporate to my ears. It's so
safe.
Laptops also removes the human element from a performance for me, which is the main way I differentiate artists from each other. What makes this artist unique from others? What can I
only get from them?
Do you respect all music equally? What about Meaghan here? I mean, she's arranged a song that people seem to have responded to, no doubt on a Laptop. Should she be applauded? What factors do you bring into your eventual decision? If they're valid in your case, why, in mine, are they evidence of ignorance?