Feminists always say they want a 50/50 marriage. But if a wife isn't submissive, by definition, it can't be a 50/50 marriage.
Marriage, by definition, is the man submitting to the woman. That's what marriage is and always has been for millennia. A social compact in which men agree to submit their assets -- their money, their freedom, and often their physcical safety -- to the needs of the women.
Just by getting married at all, a man is already contributing "his share."
So for that marriage to be 50/50, she must be willing to contribute back. She does that by making a specific decision to be a submissive wife.
When eastern european or south american women treat men to cooking and cleaning and say "ok husband, sit and watch football while I cater to you" they are essentially acknowledging that the man has sacrificed something important in their lives, to support her, and she has to give something back.
If she isn't going to be a submissive wife, it's not really marriage. You might as well just donate your time and spare cash to the nearest homeless shelter.
Marriage, by definition, is the man submitting to the woman. That's what marriage is and always has been for millennia. A social compact in which men agree to submit their assets -- their money, their freedom, and often their physcical safety -- to the needs of the women.
Just by getting married at all, a man is already contributing "his share."
So for that marriage to be 50/50, she must be willing to contribute back. She does that by making a specific decision to be a submissive wife.
When eastern european or south american women treat men to cooking and cleaning and say "ok husband, sit and watch football while I cater to you" they are essentially acknowledging that the man has sacrificed something important in their lives, to support her, and she has to give something back.
If she isn't going to be a submissive wife, it's not really marriage. You might as well just donate your time and spare cash to the nearest homeless shelter.