Check out this sinister Daily Dot article by a feminist cunt named Whitney Phillips, a "media and Internet studies scholar".
It sums up very well what "feminists" want to do: silence, control and criminalize any dissent from the current party line on almost every conceivable subject.
The new twist is that they're seriously trying to sideline the obvious First Amendment protections that are still enjoyed by American men by moving toward characterizing any expressions of opinions they don't like as "hate speech".
It's bad news and it's serious. They'll be coming after places like this forum with threats of "legal action" very soon.
Feminist hatred of free-speech has never been more intense or dangerous, especially since white-knight companies like Google are completely controlled by feminazis when it comes to these matters.
Indeed, as is gleefully described in this very article, Google has just basically destroyed the Youtube comment platform.
"Hate speech laws" are coming to destroy places like the RVF and must be fought tooth and nail.
The next shaming week should be:
#WebCensorshipShamingWeek
and should target feminists and their mangina enablers in business and government.
It sums up very well what "feminists" want to do: silence, control and criminalize any dissent from the current party line on almost every conceivable subject.
The new twist is that they're seriously trying to sideline the obvious First Amendment protections that are still enjoyed by American men by moving toward characterizing any expressions of opinions they don't like as "hate speech".
It's bad news and it's serious. They'll be coming after places like this forum with threats of "legal action" very soon.
Quote:Quote:
A similarly important question is the extent to which platforms are responsible for the content their commenters post. This is particularly salient when considering racist, sexist, homophobic, and transphobic comments, as well as comments designed to threaten and intimidate other users. Is it the platform’s job to intervene when conversations veer into hateful territory?
Quote:Quote:
The kind of speech most likely to be defended by this line of reasoning is speech that is bigoted and antagonistic, largely toward women and other historically underrepresented groups (note the infrequency with which women and people of color use the “...but but FREE SPEECH” defense in a debate, whether online or off-). Free speech in the colloquial Internet sense, particularly as it’s used in the context of comment moderation, almost always justifies or outright apologizes for a typically male, typically white aggressor. It is a concept that frames freedom in terms of being free to harass others, not freedom from being harassed, or simply from being exposed to harassment (which often amounts to the same thing).
Quote:Quote:
if the goal is to encourage actual discourse within a diverse community, platforms would be wise to think beyond “free speech,” and take some measures to privilege those who are there to have a conversation, not a fire fight.
Feminist hatred of free-speech has never been more intense or dangerous, especially since white-knight companies like Google are completely controlled by feminazis when it comes to these matters.
Indeed, as is gleefully described in this very article, Google has just basically destroyed the Youtube comment platform.
"Hate speech laws" are coming to destroy places like the RVF and must be fought tooth and nail.
The next shaming week should be:
#WebCensorshipShamingWeek
and should target feminists and their mangina enablers in business and government.
same old shit, sixes and sevens Shaft...