[Divorco]

A Study of 10,000 Porn Stars

At 117 lbs, the average female performer is a considerable 48 lbs under the national average for women, and the average male, at 167.5 lbs, weighs 27 lbs less than the national average for men.

the ten most prolific male performers, on average, have slept on-screen with 1,013 different women each (45 a year for an average career length of 22.4 years). Whereas the ten most prolific women on average have slept with 148 different men (8 a year for an average career length of 17.7 years).

according to some anti-pornography websites, the majority of women who try porn get the hell out of it right away. ... The actual number of single film quitters is between 10% and 30% ... depending on how you sample the women, ... the majority (at least 53%) do three or more.

[WanderingSoul]

The most shocking thing about these statistics is that the national average for chicks weight is 165lbs. Jesus fucking Christ that is high. Is that correct?

[sixsix]

While being considerably shorter, the average American female weighs more than an adult, male chimpanzee. Haha.

What's surprising to me is that female porn stars only have 8 new notches a year. So this also means that many, many normal girls are sluttier than porn actresses. But they don't get money for it.

[Acute Angle]

The statistics for notches imply that the most popular males get a lot of repeat work, whereas there are a LOT of females who do one or two gigs and then drop off the roster. So, does this reflect the male desire for novelty, assuming most consumers of porn are men?

[Cincinnatus]

(02-16-2013 07:40 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

What's surprising to me is that female porn stars only have 8 new notches a year. So this also means that many, many normal girls are sluttier than porn actresses.

From what I understand, men get paid far less per performance than females do. Therefore a female can pay the bills with fewer performances. Still surprising that 8 per year is the average, though.

I also agree with your inference that lots of "normal" girls are taking far more dick than porn actresses. Not only are they not getting paid, they're probably carrying around more diseases, and unknowingly.

[Timoteo]

The top women in the business pretty much get veto power over who they'll fuck on screen. Granted. There are fewer guys that make the cut in the business - not a lot of them can turn it on when the lights come up and people are watching, that's why they get so much work. As for the women, there are a ton of new "starlets" coming down the pipe daily, so they're usually getting broken in by veteran guys in the business. Some of the top chicks also do girl-on-girl, cutting down on the overall amount of dicks they take. The top chicks are also under contract, so they get paid for working less, and also support their income making appearances and merchandising products. And yes, men get paid less. I watched this documentary by Timothy Greenfield-Sanders called "Thinking XXXX." He's a photographer, and he filmed the making of his book of photography of porn stars, and it was interspersed with interviews. Some of the men were resentful of the fact that they were considered interchangeable props, and not paid as well. One dude, who claimed to be straight, actually does GAY porn, because men get paid very well in that niche. FUCK THAT.

[Tenerife]

(02-16-2013 07:40 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

What's surprising to me is that female porn stars only have 8 new notches a year. So this also means that many, many normal girls are sluttier than porn actresses. But they don't get money for it.

What this also means my friend is that many girls you THINK are "normal" actually have DONE PORN at some point in their lives.

[Cincinnatus]

(02-16-2013 09:51 AM)Tenerife Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 07:40 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

What's surprising to me is that female porn stars only have 8 new notches a year. So this also means that many, many normal girls are sluttier than porn actresses. But they don't get money for it.

What this also means my friend is that many girls you THINK are "normal" actually have DONE PORN at some point in their lives.

I seriously wonder how many women, just in America, have been paid to do porn. Let's discount all the amateur porn out there - I'm talking professional. My guess is tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands or even more. A man could jerk multiple times per day to paid porn and probably never jerk to the same bitch twice.

[Double Salad]

For some reason I found this interesting.

87% Take Facial
31% Swallow

There should also be a percentage for the stars whose pussy actually gets wet.

[BoiBoi]

The average American female weighs just as much as the average male porn actor. Not cool

[Ensam]

That's 8 notches _in porn_. A lot of these chicks escort on the side and they have their personal lives. My guess is the average girl in porn is seeing more than 8 new dicks a year.

[Tex Pro]

(02-16-2013 10:54 AM)Ensam Wrote:  

That's 8 notches _in porn_. A lot of these chicks escort on the side and they have their personal lives. My guess is the average girl in porn is seeing more than 8 new dicks a year.

A lot of girls do more than 8 per year, but they stay in porn for a short time, so it skews the statistics.

For example, a new girl to porn will get booked a lot and does maybe 12 - 15 scenes, and then leaves porn when she doesn't get as much work after that. This is because websites and porn companies are always hungry for new talent, but once a girl has been shot by a lot of the websites/companies, her value goes down unless she is very hot or has some other star quality, and she won't get booked as much anymore. The 8 per year stat is based of the most prolific porn girls, who have longevity, and these girls tend to be contract girls, so they do far fewer scenes per year.

What always struck me about porn girls is how short their careers generally are. The article the OP linked doesn't say, but I would guess that the average length of a porn chicks career has to be less than a year.

[kosko]

(02-16-2013 10:54 AM)Ensam Wrote:  

That's 8 notches _in porn_. A lot of these chicks escort on the side and they have their personal lives. My guess is the average girl in porn is seeing more than 8 new dicks a year.

Even with turning tricks they can get 5000-10k and up each costumer. This can only be for a couple hours of work. I would guess the top crust of women are pulling on average 350-500k per year.

[WesternCancer]

(02-16-2013 10:01 AM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 09:51 AM)Tenerife Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 07:40 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

What's surprising to me is that female porn stars only have 8 new notches a year. So this also means that many, many normal girls are sluttier than porn actresses. But they don't get money for it.

What this also means my friend is that many girls you THINK are "normal" actually have DONE PORN at some point in their lives.

I seriously wonder how many women, just in America, have been paid to do porn. Let's discount all the amateur porn out there - I'm talking professional. My guess is tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands or even more. A man could jerk multiple times per day to paid porn and probably never jerk to the same bitch twice.

And white knights still put chicks on a pedestal. I don't understand how dudes can have 20 tabs of different chicks getting fucked every which way and still pedestalize girls they run into in their every day life.

[WestIndianArchie]

redacted

[Tenerife]

(02-16-2013 12:03 PM)WesternCancer Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 10:01 AM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 09:51 AM)Tenerife Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 07:40 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

What's surprising to me is that female porn stars only have 8 new notches a year. So this also means that many, many normal girls are sluttier than porn actresses. But they don't get money for it.

What this also means my friend is that many girls you THINK are "normal" actually have DONE PORN at some point in their lives.

I seriously wonder how many women, just in America, have been paid to do porn. Let's discount all the amateur porn out there - I'm talking professional. My guess is tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands or even more. A man could jerk multiple times per day to paid porn and probably never jerk to the same bitch twice.

And white knights still put chicks on a pedestal. I don't understand how dudes can have 20 tabs of different chicks getting fucked every which way and still pedestalize girls they run into in their every day life.

I know, seriously right? You would think the ubiquity of porn would get rid of white-knight mentality.

[Tex Pro]

(02-16-2013 12:19 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  

He based the whole thing on the notoriously unreliable IAFD.

Jada Stevens per IAFD - 137 - http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Ja...tevens.htm


Jada Stevens in her own words - about 300
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RW9LKziHhic

Lol @ 8 a year, foh.

And he ain't even mention the whole escorting thing.

just google, "the erotic review", a whole website of punters that compare notes on escorts and porn star escorts.

WIA

Good point. IAFD is unreliable since it doesn't include a lot of website scenes.

[Cincinnatus]

(02-16-2013 12:03 PM)WesternCancer Wrote:  

And white knights still put chicks on a pedestal. I don't understand how dudes can have 20 tabs of different chicks getting fucked every which way and still pedestalize girls they run into in their every day life.

I will never understand this either.

Shit, I took my girlfriend's virginity, and before I started teaching her, she didn't know how to handle a dick - I seriously don't think she'd ever even touched one before I got with her. And I still don't pedestalize her.

Compare that to girls that started fucking at age 14 or 15 and are now in their mid twenties. God only knows how many dicks most of 'em have had, and will continue to gobble on until some beta chump decides to put a ring on quickly decaying assets.

As I always say, if men didn't put up with this shit, at least half of it would never be an issue.

I quote it often, but it's true - somebody around here used to have a signature that said "Feminism - a sixty year long shit test men have constantly been failing."

[WestIndianArchie]

redacted

[Basil Ransom]

My one beef with the analysis is that the sample is too big in a sense - it includes everyone who's ever appeared in the porno IMDB. If you want to get a sense of what makes pornstars shine, you'd want to narrow it down to the repeat performers, and not include some chick who appeared in one flick. I'd bet some of the statistics would change if you limited it to say, the top 1,000 performers, instead of 10,000. Also interesting that the top ten performers, aside from Tori Black and Sunny Leone, do not have *very* beautiful faces - there's a lot more to sex appeal than just facial attractiveness. DPP and DAP are a lot more common than I'd have thought - I never watch that shit.

But it's definitely handy nonetheless.

[Excelsior]

(02-16-2013 12:24 PM)Tenerife Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 12:03 PM)WesternCancer Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 10:01 AM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 09:51 AM)Tenerife Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 07:40 AM)sixsix Wrote:  

What's surprising to me is that female porn stars only have 8 new notches a year. So this also means that many, many normal girls are sluttier than porn actresses. But they don't get money for it.

What this also means my friend is that many girls you THINK are "normal" actually have DONE PORN at some point in their lives.

I seriously wonder how many women, just in America, have been paid to do porn. Let's discount all the amateur porn out there - I'm talking professional. My guess is tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands or even more. A man could jerk multiple times per day to paid porn and probably never jerk to the same bitch twice.

And white knights still put chicks on a pedestal. I don't understand how dudes can have 20 tabs of different chicks getting fucked every which way and still pedestalize girls they run into in their every day life.

I know, seriously right? You would think the ubiquity of porn would get rid of white-knight mentality.

Just so you guys know, this is part of why I still continue updating the "What Do You Guys Consider a 10?" thread. When I was a teenager, oneitis was a serious problem. I would see one girl in real life or occasionally on TV and sort of got her stuck in my head on a pedestal. The obsession would last for years sometimes.

The more porn I watched, the more I realized the fallacy of this. When I began transitioning to amateur porn (I don't pay much mind to the mainstream stuff, it bores me now), this became even more obvious as I started to realize just how many pretty girls there were out there who weren't even famous or well known.

With the 10 thread (and now the Black Hotness thread), I'm able to find new chicks from around the globe on a daily basis, many of whom are not well known at all and quite a few of whom are just college chicks or amateurs. Every day there is a new batch of beautiful women-you could fall in love with a different chick every hour.

Just the process of updating that thread helps me to prevent myself from ever having the kind of oneitis I did as a kid since it enforces the reality that pretty girls are not as rare a commodity as so many chodes make them out to be.

It is much harder now for me to get irrationally and prematurely sprung on one girl in my personal life knowing what I know now. I'm glad for that. Sometimes I fear it makes me a little too apathetic (basically a 180 from the extreme thirstiness I displayed 3-4 years ago), but it is still an immense improvement.

[Teedub]

(02-16-2013 10:51 AM)BoiBoi Wrote:  

The average American female weighs just as much as the average male porn actor. Not cool

Pretty disgusting statistic. I was driving home from a friend's house earlier, through a studenty area of town and I was analysing the girls as I drove past them. Its a Saturday night, so they were dressed to go out... I was actually getting depressed at the amount of overweight girls. I don't mean obese or even outright fat, just girls with probably half a stone to a stone (7-14lbs) extra fat. They aren't seen as being fat in today's world, yet they would be out of the ordinary even 20 years ago.

[Giovonny]

(02-16-2013 12:24 PM)Tenerife Wrote:  

I know, seriously right? You would think the ubiquity of porn would get rid of white-knight mentality.

Porn reducing white knights, oneitis, and putting girls on a pedestal???

I don't know.

I think, for alot of guys, PORN/MASTURBATION IS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SEX.

They don't want to work on their game. They don't want to improve their diet. They don't want to workout. They don't want to upgrade their wardrobe. They don't want to improve their conversational skills and sense of humor. It's too much work.

It's easier to jerk off.

I don't know if porn helps players or hurts players. I guess it depends how you use it.

[Teedub]

^ This is why the nofap guys have a point.

It DOES decrease motivation and it is an easy way out. If porn was blocked on the internet for a month, the women of this world wouldn't know what had hit them. In fact, I'd love it to happen just to see the Jezebel article.

[Excelsior]

(02-16-2013 04:56 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

(02-16-2013 10:51 AM)BoiBoi Wrote:  

The average American female weighs just as much as the average male porn actor. Not cool

Pretty disgusting statistic. I was driving home from a friend's house earlier, through a studenty area of town and I was analysing the girls as I drove past them. Its a Saturday night, so they were dressed to go out... I was actually getting depressed at the amount of overweight girls. I don't mean obese or even outright fat, just girls with probably half a stone to a stone (7-14lbs) extra fat. They aren't seen as being fat in today's world, yet they would be out of the ordinary even 20 years ago.

What you saw would be a significant improvement over what you'd see in much of the United States.