[Ocelot]

(02-01-2019 10:06 PM)bbgun Wrote:  



Teacher suggested teen play ‘naked hide and seek’: cops

A North Dakota teacher accused of sending a 17-year-old student nude photos suggested he play “naked hide and seek,” according to officials.

Kelsie Laura Schmidt, a Beulah High School teacher, was charged on Jan. 24 with luring minors by computer or other means, People reported.

Authorities said the 24-year-old math teacher allegedly used Snapchat to send naked photos of herself to male students.

https://nypost.com/2019/02/01/teacher-su...seek-cops/

How will this poor 17 year old child ever recover from being propositioned by a 24 year old. When he's all grown up in a few weeks time I'm sure the trauma will still haunt him.

[WalterBlack]

UK Comedy sketch:

[kaotic]

Kelsie Laura Schmidt is fucking 24, of course she's gonna wanna dick down some 17 year old that looks like he's older.

There has to be an age minimum for women to work with teenagers.

[jeffreyjerpp]

(02-14-2019 01:44 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Kelsie Laura Schmidt is fucking 24, of course she's gonna wanna dick down some 17 year old that looks like he's older.

There has to be an age minimum for women to work with teenagers.

The entire phenomena of teachers banging students can be blamed on one thing: our society likes to pretend that human nature isn't real, because it forces us to confront inconvenient and taboo realities.

Men will want to bang any woman who appears to be fertile and healthy. Women will want to bang any male with superior genes.

This doesn't change whether the attractive person is 14 or 40, and some percent of humans will always succumb to temptation.

I had to attend a high school girls volleyball game last year. Parents on both teams seemingly thought the uniforms- which left these teen girls asses exposed, and in some cases gave them large camel toes- were somehow appropriate. As an adult heterosexual man, I can tell you there were definitely not, and I wouldn't want my teen daughter wearing something like that in public.

We should say the following: teachers and students have no need to be alone together, nor do they need to communicate electronically outside of a school email system. Doing either should be a punishable offense, including firing. No temptation, no false accusations, problem solved.

[SlickyBoy]

(02-01-2019 10:15 PM)stugatz Wrote:  

It's almost like they're OK with any degeneracy as long as it's not white (heterosexual) men over the age of majority.

Fixed it for ya.

[MOVSM]

(02-14-2019 01:44 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

There has to be an age minimum for women to work with teenagers.

Has this been posted yet? Mandatory:

[Corinth Arkadin]

(07-02-2016 04:42 PM)Nolecbo Wrote:  

http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2016/07/...x-student/


But her fortunes would soon change when a patrolling officer came across the 27 year old teacher on a recent Saturday night circa 11pm with the company of an 18 year old male. In a vast empty parking lot that is.

While the officer didn’t necessarily observe anything untoward between the two, a report via the Des Moines Register told of the cop sensing that the chance run in ‘didn’t sit right.’

It wasn’t long there after that detectives (you know what comes next right?) started investigating text messages between the school teacher and her Saturday night friend. Needless to say, according to a report via the dailycaller, cops found evidence of an ongoing sexual tryst between Amanda Dreier and her happy go lucky in lust friend

The husband looks like he wanted to go down to the Toschi station to pick up some power converters.

[TIOT12]

27 year old female has sexual relationship with 13 year old boy.





This one is out of Arizona and apparently all it took for her to become a predator was some message the boy sent to her on some school app. Crazier still, is that when the cucked husband of the teacher learned of the incident he tried to cover for the wife and ask the boy's parents not to go to the police. This makes me wonder if they had some kind of arrangement or open marriage or what not. On the other hand, maybe he was just thinking about how bad that would look on him.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/loc...980023002/

Also, it looks like the parents are trying to make a payday out of this and are suing the school too. Not sure how I feel about that. One final interesting tidbit is the parents learned of the sexual relationship because they had some type of spying software on their kid's cellphone.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/...004605002/

[Robert High Hawk]

(02-27-2019 11:52 PM)TIOT12 Wrote:  

27 year old female has sexual relationship with 13 year old boy.





This one is out of Arizona and apparently all it took for her to become a predator was some message the boy sent to her on some school app. Crazier still, is that when the cucked husband of the teacher learned of the incident he tried to cover for the wife and ask the boy's parents not to go to the police. This makes me wonder if they had some kind of arrangement or open marriage or what not. On the other hand, maybe he was just thinking about how bad that would look on him.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/loc...980023002/

Also, it looks like the parents are trying to make a payday out of this and are suing the school too. Not sure how I feel about that. One final interesting tidbit is the parents learned of the sexual relationship because they had some type of spying software on their kid's cellphone.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/...004605002/

She also apparently did some things with the boy when other people were watching.

Also she and her husband knew each other since they were 16.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...sroom.html

Why are some men like this? I'm referring to the husband.

He may be the same age, this may literally be the only thing, pussy wise and womyn feelz-wise , he knows.

In the article there is a picture where he's got the open mouth gay shock face thing going as he's next to his wife.

I credit this forum for showing me how ridiculous that whole facial expression - held at length for picture pose no less! - is for your mental attitude in life.

I did not do it frequently before, but everybody does it and if you don't know any better it's so easy to fall into the crowd.

To get back on topic: the focus in this case should be her husband. That's what we as men can relate to and understand. How did he let it get this way? Was he totally clueless? Is it so bad that men must be fully draconian and restrictive with their wives if they are remotely hot and the man is not in a super super high status?

Something to think about I guess. Maybe it's an Arizona suburb thing.

[burncushlikewood]

Well it happened, only thing to do is send her to jail. She can sit there for a bit and maybe it'll deter the behaviour in the future, haha.

[jeffreyjerpp]

(02-27-2019 11:52 PM)TIOT12 Wrote:  

Also, it looks like the parents are trying to make a payday out of this and are suing the school too. Not sure how I feel about that. One final interesting tidbit is the parents learned of the sexual relationship because they had some type of spying software on their kid's cellphone.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/...004605002/

It's completely absurd that tax payers would end up footing the bill for the behavior of a rogue teacher. It makes no sense- the school cannot possibly monitor all employees and students 24/7, and the most sensible deterrents (prison time and infamy for anyone who diddles the kids) are already in place.

If the school should do anything, it is install security camers in every classroom. There is no expectation of privacy in the classroom anyways, it is relatively inexpensive, and makes sense these days given possible threats of school shootings and pervy teachers.

Should the teacher be sued? Yes, and her wages should be garnished for the first decade she it out of prison until shes paid her debt. Any administrator who was negligent should then be fired at a minimum, as well.

Are the parents/kids entitled to millions of tax payer dollars because their son got laid? Fuck no. I would say a fair price is $100k restitution+therapy costs (and lets be honest the kid is going to be fine).

[TIOT12]

(02-28-2019 09:59 AM)jeffreyjerpp Wrote:  

(02-27-2019 11:52 PM)TIOT12 Wrote:  

Also, it looks like the parents are trying to make a payday out of this and are suing the school too. Not sure how I feel about that. One final interesting tidbit is the parents learned of the sexual relationship because they had some type of spying software on their kid's cellphone.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/...004605002/

It's completely absurd that tax payers would end up footing the bill for the behavior of a rogue teacher. It makes no sense- the school cannot possibly monitor all employees and students 24/7, and the most sensible deterrents (prison time and infamy for anyone who diddles the kids) are already in place.

If the school should do anything, it is install security camers in every classroom. There is no expectation of privacy in the classroom anyways, it is relatively inexpensive, and makes sense these days given possible threats of school shootings and pervy teachers.

Should the teacher be sued? Yes, and her wages should be garnished for the first decade she it out of prison until shes paid her debt. Any administrator who was negligent should then be fired at a minimum, as well.

Are the parents/kids entitled to millions of tax payer dollars because their son got laid? Fuck no. I would say a fair price is $100k restitution+therapy costs (and lets be honest the kid is going to be fine).

Right, but they sue the school because it has the deep pockets. The teachers don't make any money so they simply go after the school. It is the same with most lawsuits against public employees. Hence, why I said they are looking for a payday. In their minds, this may be their chance to win the lottery and the parents are actually delighted this happened. When you think about it, this is really messed up.

[TIOT12]

(02-28-2019 04:44 AM)Robert High Hawk Wrote:  

To get back on topic: the focus in this case should be her husband. That's what we as men can relate to and understand. How did he let it get this way? Was he totally clueless? Is it so bad that men must be fully draconian and restrictive with their wives if they are remotely hot and the man is not in a super super high status?

Something to think about I guess. Maybe it's an Arizona suburb thing.

Well, let's first start with the woman since she did the deed. I think it is reasonable to assume that she liked this attention because she was in total control of what happened and you have a boy who is worshipping this teacher which is something she isn't going to get from men her own age. So for her this is different than what she has received in her own life. In her own life, she has been married for at least 10 years and they probably have fallen into the same routine. What we don't know is how faithful she has been at other times or if even this is the first student?

Now, we look at the man's actions. I think it is fair to say that he does not have frame in the relationship and so she does not respect him. If she valued him, she would not be so open to this type of thing. But it may have always been this way as this may have been his first serious relationship. So to reduce this risk, the man needs to be:

1. Red pilled in the importance of frame and control.
2. Be older so he has the maturity and experience to appreciate 1.
3. The woman needs to really value him.

There are so many more messages in the world today that denigrate men and excuse bad or selfish behavior in women it is difficult for a man to really trust that a regular woman can be faithful. So you either have to accept that and take certain actions or seek out women that are not regular women like religious women or other types who are resistant to outside exposure.

The sad part is the guy may have even been doing all these things and never thought he had to worry about a 13 year old boy as a risk to his wife.

[estraudi]

(02-28-2019 04:44 AM)Robert High Hawk Wrote:  

Something to think about I guess. Maybe it's an Arizona suburb thing.

I live in the phoenix metro and there is some weird mix of vacation fun time for both sexes to let loose(a la Vegas) plus the other half which is families and kids. These young party slags then finish their party years, get a degree and gain employment at schools or wherever but their slutty vacation behavior never changes and so you see teachers like this fucking the next closest male when the wall comes approaching.

Dudes here are downright thirsty, are backstabbing gammas(no matter looks or success) who pine for the vast variety of females available here.
I think there is an inverted sexual market(more males than females) here so this creates such a weird and entangled market.

It's hard to explain but my observations are the women speak like vocal-fry valley girls, always on phones, super awkward, slovenly(but their are stunners nonetheless) and are very very entitled. Basically metro bitches everywhere nowadays I guess. Not surprised when a few of them venture off the reservation into Fucking-minors Land.

[WalterBlack]

Married teacher, 25, arrested for having sex with her 17-year-old student multiple times while she was supposed to be tutoring him

Quote:

A former Georgia high school teacher was detained after she was accused of having a sexual relationship with one of her students.

Sarah Katherine Brooks, 25, was charged with a felony count of sexual assault by persons with supervisory or disciplinary authority on Friday, according to jail records from Gwinnett County Jail.

Brooks is said to have had sex during off-campus tutoring with one of her 17-year-old students from Archer High School. The woman was the teen's physical education teacher, at the time.

The boy's mother said that the two had sex on at least three occasions, since October. One of those moments was said to have occurred at their family home while the mom was away at work, AJC reports.

On Tuesday, Archer High School principal Ken Johnson sent a letter to parents explaining that the police were alerted after school officials learned of the alleged affair.

Brooks resigned from the school, soon after.

'On Monday we received a report about this situation and our school immediately contacted the police and the school district's Division of Human Resources,' Johnson said.

'As this has been and continues to be an active police investigation there are not many details I can share. However, I can tell you that the teacher has resigned from Gwinnett County Public Schools and the school system will be forwarding information about these allegations to the Professional Standards Commission.'

'While this is not a situation we have experienced at our school previously, one time is too many. Ethics matter, and the trust our community places in its educators matters to Archer and to Gwinnett County Public Schools. This is not something we take for granted.'

Brooks has been released on $11,200 bond.

[Labienus]

She's 25? Holy crap.

She deserves to be in the Wall Victims thread.

[eradicator]

This probably doesn’t belong in the thread as the teacher wasn’t having sex. Lauren Miranda, 25, sent a topless photo to her boyfriend. A student got ahold of the photo and got the teacher fired

Wb , would study extra hard in her fifth grade math class



https://nypost.com/2019/04/01/teacher-cl...boyfriend/

[eradicator]

Ah hell, is there a way to reduce the size on that? it's just a teacher showing off her tits

[Greyman]

God Damn woman...

You live in a shit hole....typical.

Retread to say but...WTF is with young decent to hot chicks these days with absolutely horrendous looking rooms. Just broke up with my hot little 23 yr old and just to get her to a marginal level of cleanliness was probably one of the reasons, among admittedly many others, that the constant tutorials on BASIC life skills made me into a exasperated mentor/authoritarian more than a lover... given the amount of wrath I had to call down.

For the love of...decline hurry up! I'm getting too old to wait for the second coming of femininity.

Signed:
Black Pilled and wishing I could let go and let GOD pill into my mindset...

[Benjamin88]

That case about Jennifer Fichter makes me so sad. 22 years behind bars for sex with three 17 year olds.
17 years is the max minimum age of sexual consent i could find ! So she gets 22 years for power relationships? Is it even illegal?

[AneroidOcean]

33 year old with a 13 year old:

Quote:



When detectives first told former Tenaya Middle School teacher Justine Karen Nelson that she was being accused of giving one of her students oral sex, she was shocked and broke out in tears.

She worried about her job, her marriage, and her child. Nelson, a popular teacher, denied ever touching a student, let alone committing a sex act on him.

“That’s seriously disgusting,” she told police during a taped interview that was played in court Tuesday.

Nelson, 33, is on trial for an incident that allegedly took place in 2016 inside her classroom. She is charged with felony lewd or lascivious acts with a minor and oral copulation.



Fresno police sex crimes detectives Sylvia Martinez and Derek Avila interviewed Nelson at her school in 2016. Portions of a two hour recorded interview were played for the jury.

Detectives told Nelson she was being questioned because a former student accused her of giving him oral sex several times while he was a student at Tenaya. Police said they were also looking into whether she sent semi-nude photos to two former students.

Detectives asked Nelson point blank if the rumors were true. Reacting with disbelief, she said: “Are you kidding me? No, never, my God, never, ever.”

But as detectives continued questioning her, and also challenging her truthfulness, her answers began tell a different story.

She admitted to giving the student oral sex two to three times, but only after he coerced her. At first, she said he forced her to do it, but she later clarified that he manipulated her.

The student, who testified last week, said he did not coerce or manipulate her. During his testimony, he admitted to having a relationship with Nelson.

During the police interview, Nelson told detectives the student threatened to spread rumors about her if she did not consent.

She agreed to do it, but only out of fear, she said. She also admitted to sending him and another former student semi-nude photos of herself.

Nelson, who had aspirations of being an administrator, began to cry in court as she listened to the interview.

As detectives wrapped up their interview with her, she was escorted from the campus into a unmarked police car to be transported to the Fresno County Jail.

But what Nelson didn’t realize is that detectives were not done gathering information. As they talked in the car, their conversation was being secretly recorded. Nelson began to speak more casually about her fear of going to jail, being a felon and her unhappy home life.

Avila told Nelson that she deserved better.

Nelson said she probably didn’t.

“Look at me, I’m hooking up with a 14-year-old,” she said in the recording. Prosecutors have said the teen was 13 when the incidents happened.

Nelson also sounded relieved that her relationship with the student was finally exposed.

“I knew this day was coming,” she said. “I was literally praying, give me consequences or let it go.”

Nelson, who is being defended by Roger Nuttall, is expected to testify Thursday or Friday. The trial continues Wednesday in Judge Kristi Culver Kapetan’s court room.

[SlickyBoy]

(04-03-2019 04:15 PM)Benjamin88 Wrote:  

That case about Jennifer Fichter makes me so sad. 22 years behind bars for sex with three 17 year olds.
17 years is the max minimum age of sexual consent i could find ! So she gets 22 years for power relationships? Is it even illegal?

Yeah, it is illegal. Even if the age of consent was 17, teachers and others in positions of power aren't allowed to go around boinking their charges, especially not in the homes of the kid's parents.

Have to remember these women have at least ten years experience manipulating men by the time some teenage dude with his first hard on shows up looking for some snatch. The power dynamic is exponentially stacked against the kid. She deserves more than whatever she gets.

[Brother Abdul Majeed]

(04-04-2019 07:10 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

(04-03-2019 04:15 PM)Benjamin88 Wrote:  

That case about Jennifer Fichter makes me so sad. 22 years behind bars for sex with three 17 year olds.
17 years is the max minimum age of sexual consent i could find ! So she gets 22 years for power relationships? Is it even illegal?

Yeah, it is illegal. Even if the age of consent was 17, teachers and others in positions of power aren't allowed to go around boinking their charges, especially not in the homes of the kid's parents.

Have to remember these women have at least ten years experience manipulating men by the time some teenage dude with his first hard on shows up looking for some snatch. The power dynamic is exponentially stacked against the kid. She deserves more than whatever she gets.

Not only that, there have been legitimate cases where the impact on the boy's life has been very negative.

Besides, in this day and age of equality, shouldn't women receive equal sentences for diddling with kids?

[SlickyBoy]

They should, but even a female prosecutor will admit that society does not hold women accountable to the same degree as men. They always worry about juries coming back in cases like this with either not guilty or hung juries resulting in a mistrial.

There's been at least a couple of times where the minor child seduced by a female teacher has wound up paying child support to the kid she decided to have from their illicit relationship. Fucked up as can be, but this is the clown world we're living in now.