[CynicalContrarian]

Where's that image of the guy photographing the horizon while the chick lies back photographing herself?

[Matt3B]

(08-01-2018 09:11 PM)Alsos Wrote:  

(08-01-2018 02:03 PM)kosko Wrote:  

(08-01-2018 11:47 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  

...
Cuck lagoon. They are out in droves.

So this is a thing? This is how these girls get these IG shots because their "photographer" Soy-boyfriends are basically just photogs for hire when they travel?

Wow, it all makes sense now.

A few years back, I came across a photo collection by a New York photographer who would set up a camera at a random street corner, take a photograph every few seconds during the day for several days, and then superimpose together all the people displaying some common element. The result was an interesting and often hilarious misrepresentation of reality: everyone in the photo, sometimes 50 or more people, wearing red or walking on crutches or holding their hand out checking for rain or whatever, completely oblivious to the others doing the same. (Naturally, because each person doing it was photographed at a different moment.)

I'd love to see a photographer do the same at Instagram-popular spots like this beach: illustrate the banal imitativeness of what these people are doing by showing a hundred or more couples stacked up taking the same picture at the same time, as this photo captures with only three.

ETA: the photographer in question may be Pelle Cass: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pelle+cass&t=h...&ia=images
Same idea, anyway, though I don't see there any of the common-element pictures I remember.

Mate, this is so true. I had a door to door sales job when I was 19, it completely changed my outlook on life. It was a real red pill beginning, and in a way kind of made me bitter to the world from such a young age.

I used to go from house to house and people would be so proud of their belongings, and then I'd go to the next house and see someone with a better TV and see how proud they were of it, and then someone else down the road with the same TV and how proud of it they were. And I used to think "don't you know everybody else has this TV?"

They didn't though. They thought they were special. I learned at such a young age that nobody is special, there is always someone either on your level to humble you or there is someone better, or something better to aim for. Always.

Look here too:

https://www.abbeyroad.com/crossing#

It's the famous crossing that The Beatles used for their album cover. It's a webcam that shows people there live. I literally just clicked on it and someone is posing there. Every day, almost all day, people doing the same poses at the same crossing, thinking that they are unique.

Anyway, sorry for derailing the soy-ness of the thread but it was a particularly thought provoking post!

[kosko]

^^^ moment I clicked that webcam link as well I see a girl cross with a goofy effeminate with backpacks take her picture as she crossed.

[Tex]

(06-16-2018 06:42 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

I guarantee Member after Member on here has stories to tell of how having pity for guys lower down the Socio-Sexual Hierarchy never works in practice. They resent / despise alpha masculinity - they genuinely-think they're superior to, say, a 6ft4 muscular, handsome sports star with multiple women hanging off his arms - and this hatred blinds them to both being hearing the truth when it is told to them, or ever forming a realistic, objective perception of themselves and their behaviour.

You have to understand that they're exactly where they want to be. That type of change can only come from within.

I can think of three instances where I tried to befriend some beta fuck after he said he wanted to be more like me, and that just led to either complete failure or being outright betrayed one way or another.

Soy boys love their lifestyle and will never change even if sometimes they have moments of clarity and realize they are inferior in some respects.

I have to confess that when I was a skinny 15-year-old incel I would regularly repeat the mantra "he's too big" and "muscles are not important."

Even my dad would call guys "meatheads" and "juiced apes" when we'd see a big guy in public. And my dad is a big ass guy.

I should've known then.

P.S. Soy doesn't give you fucking gains.

[CynicalContrarian]

Oy freakin' vey.
The fall of Rome was not supposed to be a 'how-to' guide...

Brazilian cops drop 'masculinity' requirement

Sao Paulo (AFP) - Police candidates in southern Brazil are now free to get in touch with their softer side.
"Masculinity" has been dropped from the list of 72 required attributes for wannabe cops in the state of Parana. Also gone: a prohibition on falling in love.
The macho criteria were part of the psychological profile demanded for candidates in 16 different types of job, all of them open both to women and men.
Masculinity was defined as "an individual's capacity to remain unmoved by violent scenes, to put up with vulgarity, not to become emotional easily and not to have interest in romantic episodes or love."
After criticism from a national gay alliance, the Brazilian attorneys' association and the Parana government, the police rewrote the rules.
The new version substitutes masculinity for "endurance" and deletes the clause on romance.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/brazilian-cop...52287.html

So, so brave; so, so strong...

Rather surprised that comments are allowed on that article & that most of the comments are double-plus un-good.

[infowarrior1]

[Super_Fire]

(08-16-2018 09:54 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Oy freakin' vey.
The fall of Rome was not supposed to be a 'how-to' guide...

Brazilian cops drop 'masculinity' requirement

Sao Paulo (AFP) - Police candidates in southern Brazil are now free to get in touch with their softer side.
"Masculinity" has been dropped from the list of 72 required attributes for wannabe cops in the state of Parana. Also gone: a prohibition on falling in love.
The macho criteria were part of the psychological profile demanded for candidates in 16 different types of job, all of them open both to women and men.
Masculinity was defined as "an individual's capacity to remain unmoved by violent scenes, to put up with vulgarity, not to become emotional easily and not to have interest in romantic episodes or love."
After criticism from a national gay alliance, the Brazilian attorneys' association and the Parana government, the police rewrote the rules.
The new version substitutes masculinity for "endurance" and deletes the clause on romance.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/brazilian-cop...52287.html

So, so brave; so, so strong...

Rather surprised that comments are allowed on that article & that most of the comments are double-plus un-good.

Is not normal.

[gework]

(08-03-2018 06:25 AM)Matt3B Wrote:  

They didn't though. They thought they were special. I learned at such a young age that nobody is special, there is always someone either on your level to humble you or there is someone better, or something better to aim for. Always.

I've noticed such traits are strong among what I call the failed middle-class. These are typically people from top 10-25% income families with 110+ IQs. They often have enveloped a whole host of left-wing ideas, which has poisoned their life progress as much as their degrees in drumming and the humanities. As their career in music etc doesn't manifest they usually end up bagging soy products at a health shop or squeezing goji berries in a juice bar. They often live rent-free into their 30s with their parents - the luxury of which they use to save up a few months wages to splurge on travelling. But there are plenty of ways these failed middle-classers turn out.

Whatever baubles these people can feather their nest with they become intensely proud of. But since they do so little to better themselves this often takes the shape of just being intensely proud of their above average intelligence ... which they have found no application for.

But since they have little experience beyond being misinformed on economics in The Guardian and beating off to silicone boobies, their identity and self-worth is often centered around just being able to sound smart.

The poison chalice for these people is the mental trick they play with themselves that being distinctly average or often just a smart-sounding loser is something to feel special about is a barrier to improvement, which they often shun for political and psychological reasons.

The same people also make a lot of rationalisations about how they could have done this or that but didn't want to. And point to other people who are often distinctly average or mildly above average and start slagging them off for having mortgages, a wife etc - things they probably won't have in their 40s.

The worst offender of all this once said to me, "I could have been loaded if I'd bought Bitcoin." So could a special needs child. Complete masturbation.

It's caused by being stuck in childhood modes of gratification, where you can do a dump in your bed and mummy will still tell you you're her special little solider. You don't have to do anything. Just thinking you are special and believing anything you come up with. It's a life killer and appears to be becoming more common.

Soy boys are also stuck in childhood modes. They think that acting like a cute little boy will continue to rain down the treats of life, like they used to from mummy's mammaries. When it doesn't they have no other mode to switch to. And when people's means of getting things stop working and they can't develop a new means, they become dysfunctional. This is a soy boy. The dysfunction is they will humiliate themselves in the hope a bit of attention.



As mentioned above. If you ever try and drop an RP truth on soykind they get really defensive. You're penetrating their child's bubble. Remaining a child is a protection against having to analyse the game in which they are not even on the board but desperately want to play. They're like a checkers child.

[BortimusPrime]

Could have done without the visual aid

[Horus]

(08-17-2018 12:16 AM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

Could have done without the visual aid

I disagree. The visual aid, while uncomfortable to look at, perfectly illustrates gework's point about emotionally stunted children living in the body of a man. These (allegedly heterosexual) men produce wildly popular videos (on Buzzfeed I think) and have been touted as the modern day epitome of masculinity. These and other soyboys like them are increasingly the kind of "masculine" role models that young, impressionable men are being exposed to and emulating. Masculine traits such as strength of body, mind and character have all but disappeared, and are increasingly being eschewed in favour of a weird kind of childlike whimsical behaviour where they seem to be celebrating their weakness, feebleness and "floppiness." I wouldn't even call it feminine behaviour - the only apt description is "soy." Even fifteen years ago, I think most people who watched their videos would screw up their faces in disgust at their pathetic behaviour, and yet in the present year they are celebrated with literally millions of youtube views. Most of us didn't spend our formative years being exposed to this kind of limp wristed nonsense, so we're in the fortunate position where we can recognise faggotry when we see it, but if you're a kid in his early teens being exposed to this relentlessly on TV, the Internet and movies, it's surely going to have an effect on the kind of men they will grow up to become. So I think it's important to see pictures like this, to recognise these soyboys for what they are, and remind ourselves how much they are doing to undermine our culture.

[godfather dust]

Horus I've noticed all the new young rappers are complete faggots (pink dreadlocks rapping about being depressed crackheads and wearing skirts.) There were no fag rappers when I was a kid.

[gework]

(08-17-2018 02:00 AM)Horus Wrote:  

recognise these soyboys for what they are, and remind ourselves how much they are doing to undermine our culture.

[Horus]

(08-17-2018 09:12 AM)gework Wrote:  

(08-17-2018 02:00 AM)Horus Wrote:  

recognise these soyboys for what they are, and remind ourselves how much they are doing to undermine our culture.

That picture proves our point. I'll bet their delusions of tough guy heroics is derived from a steady stream of super hero comic magazines well into their twenties, and a completely sheltered life where they've never experienced any real conflict beyond disputing a B- grade in the Marxism studies course. I'm sure that many of us watched Karate Kid movies or something similar when we were kids, and for a short time fantasised we were martial arts experts like the hero of the movie - only when we tried to put it into practice we usually learnt an early and valuable lesson that life doesn't work that way, and there is a difference between fantasy and reality. These guys never progressed past the fantasy stage. They are delusional children who truly believe they are tough guys capable of bringing down the system, and yet they can't even manage to raise their fists without looking like they are preparing for a backwoods circle jerk. Any sane person taking an honest look at these freedom fighters would immediately recognise that they harbour the same delusions as a six year old dressing up as Batman, with the only difference that childhood fantasies are acceptable for children, but not so much for grown "men."

[debeguiled]

Bunch of limp fisters.

[Ski pro]

(08-02-2018 07:14 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Where's that image of the guy photographing the horizon while the chick lies back photographing herself?

This?
   

[CynicalContrarian]

Magnificent mockery :

[url=https://twitter.com/rooshv/status/1036602990084411392][/url]

[gework]

What a son of Charles Manson would have ended up like, on soy:

[gework]

He's in it for the soy she's got stored in those gazongas.



Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIqEKB_J6hI