[Skull_Leader]

Sorry if this is a dupe, but I have no idea what to even input in a search to find this.

[Suits]

Definitely thread worthy, just for the second sequence.

I'm serious.

[Skull_Leader]

lol the part with the drill instructor?

[Mercenary]

[262]

So when are we granting amnesty to these illegal politics posters?

[Mercenary]

[Suits]

(10-30-2016 05:35 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  

WB.

[Mercenary]

Donald Trump even has real Japanese female stalkers.
Someone needs to give this woman a job in the next Trump administration.

[Suits]

^Crazy or brilliant?

[Mercenary]

(10-30-2016 06:08 AM)Suits Wrote:  

^Crazy or brilliant?

Like most Asian women, the answer (as always) is - BOTH !

[ElFlaco]

YouTube has been suggesting I watch this video for weeks so this thread inspired me to check it out.

These are man-in-the-street interviews with young, vaguely hipster Japanese people. The interviewer specifically asked about Trump's comments regarding defending Japan militarily. The responses, while not pro-Trump in general, were measured and thoughtful. Mostly they expressed concern that Trump was too aggressive in his manner of speaking.

[sterling_archer]

Thanks for posting this interesting video OP

[HermeticAlly]

That was a good video, the people interviewed come across as infinitely more reasonable than American millennials. Of course, it probably helps that the Japanese media isn't as likely to demonize Trump/spread wide-scale fear about him. I think Japanese feel a certain sense of detachment from Trump that makes them less prone to knee-jerk reactions - maybe because Trump comes across as a combination of the hyper-masculine bubble-era businessman and stereotypical American boisterousness.

Interestingly, Japan has had several (fairly) recent, somewhat controversial politicians who are very Trump-like in their views and mannerisms. Former Osaka mayor Toru Hashimoto comes to mind, but also ex-Tokyo governor Shintaro Ishihara.

[HermeticAlly]

(10-30-2016 05:27 AM)262 Wrote:  

So when are we granting amnesty to these illegal politics posters?

Maybe the thread got moved, but right now it's sitting in Everything Else, not Politics & War.

[Suits]

(10-30-2016 08:04 AM)HermeticAlly Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 05:27 AM)262 Wrote:  

So when are we granting amnesty to these illegal politics posters?

Maybe the thread got moved, but right now it's sitting in Everything Else, not Politics & War.

Doesn't matter. Low post count members are not permitted to discuss politics or controversial race topics anywhere on this forum.

[Phoenix]

(10-30-2016 08:51 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Doesn't matter. Low post count members are not permitted to discuss politics or controversial race topics anywhere on this forum.

What else they going to discuss, on this now political forum, other things?

Few in the membership actually support that rule except a small number of, and the host has changed his rules before.

[sterling_archer]

As a new guy, I must ask what is the reason behind 250 posts rule in order to write on Politics sub forum?

[pheonix500000]

(10-30-2016 10:18 AM)sterling_archer Wrote:  

As a new guy, I must ask what is the reason behind 250 posts rule in order to write on Politics sub forum?

It is to dissuade troll accounts from posting.

[Cattle Rustler]

Is not just the politics forum but rather not posting about on the entire forum.

I've mentioned this to members mutiple times, just as suits has but for some reason 2 pages down the thread some special little snowflake thinks they're the exception.

[Skull_Leader]

Didn't know about the 250 post rule. I don't post often, and when I was last active here, I don't think that rule was around...

[The Beast1]

(10-30-2016 04:02 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Definitely thread worthy, just for the second sequence.

I'm serious.

∞/10 would watch again.

[spokepoker]

(10-30-2016 03:15 PM)Skull_Leader Wrote:  

Didn't know about the 250 post rule. I don't post often, and when I was last active here, I don't think that rule was around...

It wasn't, until it was necessary to enact it. I think I remember mid-primaries we got quite a few trolls.

[CJ_W]

(10-30-2016 03:15 PM)Skull_Leader Wrote:  

Didn't know about the 250 post rule. I don't post often, and when I was last active here, I don't think that rule was around...

It is now. Get over it.

[Suits]

(10-30-2016 10:13 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(10-30-2016 08:51 AM)Suits Wrote:  

Doesn't matter. Low post count members are not permitted to discuss politics or controversial race topics anywhere on this forum.

What else they going to discuss, on this now political forum, other things?

If you aren't working to improve yourself in one or more of the following areas, you aren't trying hard enough.

Lifestyle

Game

Travel

(10-30-2016 10:13 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

Few in the membership actually support that rule except a small number of, and the host has changed his rules before.

Roosh has a challenging and thankless role in all this, but I know he works very hard to keep the forum as fair and balanced as possible.

I can assure you that he doesn't make forum rule changes without extremely careful thought and consideration.

He himself has stated that he expects that folks will be disappointed even after a Trump win, because positive change takes time.

Having guys who only come here to discuss politics isn't good for the forum or the members themselves.

Even in ideal Trump America, there still will be winners and losers and there are going to be some guys that don't know how to earn enough money to support their preferred lifestyle, dress themselves respectable and attract the women that will satisfy their desires.

If you are American, you can only cast one vote for Trump. You have considerably more affect on your own successes and failures.

I wasn't happy with the options I had in Canada a few years ago when I graduated from university. I could have bitched about how the politicians were responsible for this. Instead, I moved to the other side of the world and in two years built a lifestyle that I would have never been able to create in twice the time in Canada.

The best thing forum members can do is to focus on developing themselves, so that they'll do well in life no matter what the political flavor of the year is.

I'm better for it and they will be too.

[262]

Hehe - so many newbs breaking the rule that Roosh made the punishment harsher. Good job OP

(10-31-2016 04:11 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Now that the sub 250 rule is clearly known to all members, the punishment for breaking this rule will be a one week suspension instead of three days. If the member already has a 40% warning, the rule violation will result in a permanent ban.