Quote: (03-24-2016 03:35 AM)Suits Wrote:
Quote: (03-24-2016 03:04 AM)Putin Closes Wrote:
Quote: (03-24-2016 01:34 AM)Suits Wrote:
Quote: (03-24-2016 12:11 AM)Putin Closes Wrote:
![[Image: uGKY3jF.png]](http://i.imgur.com/uGKY3jF.png)
Honestly, that's a very suspicious camera angle. I don't even know what I'm looking at.
![[Image: MBinToQ.jpg]](http://imgur.com/MBinToQ.jpg)
A little bit of meat on her bones.
![[Image: KpNQ98w.jpg]](http://imgur.com/KpNQ98w.jpg)
Reality.
Same one:
![[Image: ArjNANw.png]](http://i.imgur.com/ArjNANw.png)
What I'm seeing here is no tits and fat legs 2 or 3 times as thick as her arms. 2/10 WNB.
Based on the evidence in this more accurate photograph, in the last picture she is clearly wearing a bra that is doing all the work.
But hey, one man's trash is another man's treasure. There's no reason why we can't all just bang the girls that we personally prefer.
As long as you're happy, there's no shame in banging whoever you like.
You're saying this girl (who to clarify from my previous post I have not banged, just used a random OKC profile for an example to protect my own privacy of the worst quality I have touched) is the same as the fat bottom whale you posted earlier?
What?! Well good to know, at least in the future can use as a reference for your posts.
This girl is a straight 5 by the way, average. You would be lieing if you had this girl naked next to you and did not want to bang.
Not only that your contradicting yourself, cause I'm sure the anorexic looking girl has a smaller tits then the average guy.
You're all over the place, and I don't think can have a rational discussion with you over this matter. In the end, I stand by my point.
I put anorexic girl, who is prob a 6 with some more weight, as the same level of desirability as this average Filipina.