[Belgrano]

(01-22-2016 07:34 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Dave Chappelle came back in 2015 with big comedy gigs, GQ cover, interviews on talk shows. You don't get that kind of promo coverage spontaneously. Maybe he finally gave in?

Now that you say it, it reminds me that there is actually some peculiar theories about his strange behavior and the reasons for his sudden departure to Africa, which if you choose to believe them certainly sheds a different light on his comeback on the big stage.
Well, at least Bill Burr is keeping it real:

[Mr. Pink]

(01-24-2016 02:56 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

snip

Really good insight.

One recent movie I've been curious about is the "The Big Short". This thing is basically one and a half hour of demonizing bankers (perhaps rightfully so) using big-names like Brad Pitt, Ryan Gosling, Christian Bale, and Steve Carell. Nominated for all kinds of Oscars. After the 90 minutes of baby-talking the audience through the financial crisis and exposing the massive web of crime behind it, it of course ends with a preachy message with the overall theme being "people are racist and irrationally blame immigration for their problems."

What I want to know is what there is to gain by making the details of the crisis so public. Why rub in our faces the fact that the top bankers walked away with billions at the expense of the average citizens and that there were no arrests or any real repercussions whatsoever? I just can't figure out what they're trying to accomplish by drawing so much attention to it.

[Belgrano]

Missed the time window for the editing of my former post.

Another comedian that should be mentioned is Russell Brand.
He's apparently also an activist and writer now, campaigning against capitalism and climate change, for wealth equality and socialist positions, rambling about revolution and stuff like that. Yet ignore what he's saying for a moment, and watch what he's doing.

He was married to Katy Perry, whose name is often mentioned in connection with the sinister agenda the entertainment industry seems to have.
Check vigilantcitizen for examples.
After he divorced her, he started dating Jemima Goldsmith, daughter of James Goldsmith.
Read his wiki article, he was an interesting guy, billionaire, and also rumoured to be the father of Lady Diana.
(His brother Teddy Goldsmith was a co-founder of the Green Party UK and board member of the International Forum on Globalization, although to be fair he also held speaches at conferences of the Nouvelle Droite. He might just have been a fanatical environmentalist and nothing else.)

It also seems the family still holds a stake at BNP Paribas, one of the largest banks in the world.
Look at the Goldsmith family tree and Jemima's siblings. Surprise, surprise.
Royalty marries royalty, always been that way.
(Both her brothers also happen to be outspoken environmentalists and sustainability advocates, one is also described as an ardent Zionist.
It happens to be the same guy that was cucked in that story.)

I doubt Russell was ignorant of those things.
Now maybe she's a great gal, or her dad a great guy, who wants nothing to do with all of that.
I think we should always judge people as individuals, we are not determined by our ancestors if we choose not to be.
Yet for Brand, what remains?
Preaching socialism, criticizing inequality, arguing for wealth redistribution, dating billionaire heiresses. Makes sense to me.

To be fair, it's nice he reached those circles, he had a difficult childhood after all:

Quote:

Brand's parents split up when he was six months old, and he was raised by his mother. He had a difficult childhood. When he was 7, a tutor sexually abused him.
When Brand was 8, his mother contracted uterine cancer and then breast cancer one year later. While she underwent treatment, Brand lived with relatives. When he was 14, he suffered from bulimia nervosa. When he was 16, he left home because of disagreements with his mother's partner. Brand then started to use illegal drugs such as cannabis, amphetamines, LSD, and ecstasy.
Brand says he had a "strange relationship" with his father, whom he saw sporadically and who took him to visit prostitutes during a trip to Thailand when Brand was a teenager.

I don't see how that could possibly fit into any behavorial patterns discussed in this thread.

[jariel]

(01-25-2016 05:58 AM)Mother Russia Wrote:  

Everyone is involved, from Jimmy Saville to Cosby (who got caught in the storm while he is still alive for some reason; probably pissed someone off.)

Cosby made the mistake of trying to buy NBC.

The rest is history.

[Mekorig]

(01-24-2016 10:17 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(01-24-2016 08:42 PM)NovaVirtu Wrote:  

(01-24-2016 08:35 PM)lex the impaler Wrote:  

What do you guys think about the new show on Fox about the devil retiring?

Is that that show "Lucifer"? Where the devil retires to LA?

I saw the ad, it has all the signs of a one-season wonder. Will not be watching.

It's basically a ripoff of Neil Gaiman's "Sandman". More ageing Baby Boomer "oo, I can say 'poobumfuck' in a church and get away with it" nonsense I can do without.

IIRC, Lucifer is a spin-off of Sandman.

[Samseau]

(01-24-2016 01:40 PM)-GTL Wrote:  

It's freaking long but it might be relevant for those who can watch it entirely.

Just going to vouch for this here for other forum members. Synagogue of Satan is a tremendous work that chronologues all Talmudic subversion throughout the 20th century. It is extremely thorough.

My only beef is that it is too liberal with the word "jew,"; a more careful historian makes sure to distinguish between Christian Jews (the guys who built Western Civ) and Talmudic Jews (the traitors within). But nomenclature is easily corrected for.

[K Galt]

(01-25-2016 07:02 AM)Mr. Pink Wrote:  

What I want to know is what there is to gain by making the details of the crisis so public. Why rub in our faces the fact that the top bankers walked away with billions at the expense of the average citizens and that there were no arrests or any real repercussions whatsoever? I just can't figure out what they're trying to accomplish by drawing so much attention to it.

Abracadabra! thread-53191...pid1200328

THEY told us what they are doing/did/going to do, and we do nothing about it, so THEY laugh all the way to the bank and feel absolutely zero responsibility or conscience about the lives THEY ruined.

Remember the movie, Wag the Dog?

[germanico]

(01-25-2016 08:03 AM)Celtic_Austrian Wrote:  

Royalty marries royalty, always been that way.
(Both her brothers also happen to be outspoken environmentalists and sustainability advocates, one is also described as an ardent Zionist.

I doubt Russell was ignorant of those things.
Now maybe she's a great gal, or her dad a great guy, who wants nothing to do with all of that.

Yet for Brand, what remains?

The question here is, why would a high standing aristocrat would marry his daughter to a two bit comedian and recovering addict? And for that matter, one that makes uncomfortable political statements on the regular?

[Belgrano]

^ The high standing aristocrat is dead. Also, Brand didn't marry her. They only dated for two years.

[emuelle1]

(01-24-2016 09:49 PM)Oilrig Wrote:  

I've always thought it was odd that every year it seems like there's a new chosen actress/actor that's thrown in our face everywhere. Last year it was Amy Schumer, previous years it was Jennifer Lawrence and Anne Hathaway. I always wonder if they've made some secret back room deal that allows them to be featured everywhere.

South Park sort of touched on that in their Britany Spears "sacrifice" episode. "It's gonna be a GOOD harvest..."

[AnonymousBosch]

(01-25-2016 05:58 AM)Mother Russia Wrote:  

Also look at the recent allegations of homosexual sex parties held by Brian Singer (Xmen director) and how quickly it was hushed up.

Note also that at the first hint of a whisper that George Clooney was involved, he immediately married an Age-Appropriate Woman with the all-important High-Powered Career, thereby fulfilling the Standard Hollywood Female Romantic Comedy Dream of a Career-Orientated Six turning an Eternal-Bachelor Nine into a Devoted-Husband, almost as if it was scripted....

[iamdegaussed]

This thread is actively terrifying me. It's making me want to move somewhere out into the woods and stay far away from all this shit.

I used to want to be famous, too.

[Beyond Borders]

(01-25-2016 10:02 PM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  

This thread is actively terrifying me.

Take a breath, buddy.

[Mr. Pink]

(01-25-2016 11:47 AM)K Galt Wrote:  

(01-25-2016 07:02 AM)Mr. Pink Wrote:  

What I want to know is what there is to gain by making the details of the crisis so public. Why rub in our faces the fact that the top bankers walked away with billions at the expense of the average citizens and that there were no arrests or any real repercussions whatsoever? I just can't figure out what they're trying to accomplish by drawing so much attention to it.

Abracadabra! thread-53191...pid1200328

THEY told us what they are doing/did/going to do, and we do nothing about it, so THEY laugh all the way to the bank and feel absolutely zero responsibility or conscience about the lives THEY ruined.

Remember the movie, Wag the Dog?

Haven't heard of Wag the Dog until now. Between the plot of that movie and your Abracadabra post... Somebody please just hold me.

[AnonymousBosch]

(01-25-2016 10:02 PM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  

This thread is actively terrifying me. It's making me want to move somewhere out into the woods and stay far away from all this shit.

What's there to be scared of? Their 'magick' doesn't seem to able to help them open movies; or to sell records; or to make the general public respect them on Twitter; to stop them aging like a bag of grapes left out in the sun; or even stop the Socialists from threatening to take control.

I knew various Satanists and Witches growing up. They were all losers who craved social and sexual power. For all their rituals, they all ended up living mediocre lives. If they were teenagers today they would have instantly-gravitated into SJW-ism instead of Satanism for the same reasons.

[Samseau]

Just remember, Satan is the lord of lies. He never keeps his end of the deal.

[Quintus Curtius]

At the very least, the rise of atheism is connected with the breakdown in social discipline, the ruin of government, and the decline of morals.

Many will disagree, but the fact is that religion is the social glue that keeps everyone in line.

Islands of atheism (like Hollywood) are open to penetration by all sorts of depraved ideologies and perversions.

Which is exactly what is happening now.

Maybe it means nothing, but paganism may be resurging in northern Europe also:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arch...an/407821/

If this is Europe's answer to militant Islam, then they are doomed. Doomed.

Heartiste had a great comment on the correlation between atheism and the "inviting in" of foreign conquerors.

Check this out. Agree with it or not, he definitely is on to something.

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/01/...e-mistake/

.

[nomadbrah]

(01-26-2016 12:56 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

At the very least, the rise of atheism is connected with the breakdown in social discipline, the ruin of government, and the decline of morals.

Many will disagree, but the fact is that religion is the social glue that keeps everyone in line.

Islands of atheism (like Hollywood) are open to penetration by all sorts of depraved ideologies and perversions.

Which is exactly what is happening now.

Maybe it means nothing, but paganism may be resurging in northern Europe also:

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arch...an/407821/

If this is Europe's answer to militant Islam, then they are doomed. Doomed.

Heartiste had a great comment on the correlation between atheism and the "inviting in" of foreign conquerors.

Check this out. Agree with it or not, he definitely is on to something.

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2016/01/...e-mistake/

.

Christianity in Northern Europe is a complete joke, literally infested with marxists who even publicly declare to not believe in the resurrection or creation.

Paganism never went away in Scandinavia who were only fully christened around 1400 AD, there are even findings of pagan idols in Norway from 1600.

That means Scandinavia has been pagan for significantly longer than it has been christian.

Paganism exists in two forms, the Wicca crap which is feminist new age bs and the Völkish which is what people like Varg Vikernes are about. It's nationalist and ethnic by definition and gains in popularity not as opposition to christianity but to marxism and it's destruction of ethnic identity.

I don't know why you think Asatru is a joke? It's already been used to great effect by the Nazis, who recruited their top soldiers - SS - with heavy pagan folklore. Himmler was an ardent pagan occultist and pagan folklore was everywhere in Nazi Germany.

It clearly was very effective at arousing public emotion.

Christianity in Northern Europe just has a stale smell to it. A stench of marxism and welfare. It's not cool and it won't be cool for a very long time.

[Quintus Curtius]

^^^

I was just trying to point out that I can't see paganism as an effective counterweight to militant Islam. Paganism is disorganized, lacks any organized power structure, and has no militant tradition behind it, as does Christianity.

Paganism may be fine for symbolism and beer-hall chats, but militant Islam will run right over it.

To fight force, you need greater force.

Latin Christianity does have a very extensive militant tradition, but without the militant people to fill its ranks, nothing will happen.

Just like ISIS recruits people from around the world, maybe the papacy should stop pussy-footing around and organize militant groups to fight ISIS.

.

[iop890]

(01-26-2016 01:24 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

maybe the papacy should stop pussy-footing around and organize militant groups to fight ISIS.

I can't imagine Francis doing that, he's too busy groveling before the most pozzed church on Earth.

[AnonymousBosch]

(01-26-2016 12:56 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

Personally, I think the majority of people are psychologically and emotionally damaged enough to not need a Devil Figure to teach them how to be petty, vicious, status hungry and consumed by envy.

If you're looking for the face of evil, the Devil of yore has nothing on your average 16-year-old girl. He'd step up in a cloud of smoke, ask a group of them to commit a damning sin, then they'd hear what it was and start smirking and rolling their eyes behind their hands at each other: "What a lightweight."



Thought experiment: pretend for a moment there is no God or Devil. Do you really think it would make the remotest difference to whether Lindy West or Jessica Valenti continued to act like nasty, bitter cunts?

Some people are just fundamentally-rotten to the core without needing to be lead astray. They're like it from birth. There's people I've known since Kindergarten who are as toxic now as they were then.

[blck]

Someone Wrote:

In the real world there aren't any "good guys", just varying degrees of evil working for their own interests at a time.

[Snowplow]

(01-26-2016 05:24 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(01-26-2016 12:56 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

Personally, I think the majority of people are psychologically and emotionally damaged enough to not need a Devil Figure to teach them how to be petty, vicious, status hungry and consumed by envy.

If you're looking for the face of evil, the Devil of yore has nothing on your average 16-year-old girl. He'd step up in a cloud of smoke, ask a group of them to commit a damning sin, then they'd hear what it was and start smirking and rolling their eyes behind their hands at each other: "What a lightweight."



Thought experiment: pretend for a moment there is no God or Devil. Do you really think it would make the remotest difference to whether Lindy West or Jessica Valenti continued to act like nasty, bitter cunts?

Some people are just fundamentally-rotten to the core without needing to be lead astray. They're like it from birth. There's people I've known since Kindergarten who are as toxic now as they were then.

I was just thinking about that yesterday, when I thought of a coworker. From previous talks he and I had on various issues, boiled down he has no self control. I had mentioned that I have high standards for women that I had slept with in the past, and he called me dumb for having standards. He talks about doing drugs, sleeping with prostitutes, how he gave up on lifting and would rather be lazy and eat carelessly.

It even shows in his work ethic and it's poisoning the well. I can see my other coworkers are slowly giving into laziness and a lack of care for the job. Even a boss, who is supposed to look out for us said he does give a fuck about us since we don't sign his check. I can understand his thought in general, but it doesn't give me a warm feeling when this guy used to have our backs.

Its frustrating at times. I try to stand against the current, I want to show that being a man isn't about giving into desire. Having a strong will, work ethic, individual responsibility, along with other good virtues is hard. People don't like to take the road less traveled. Everyone wants the easy way. The Devil will give you the free lunch, never take it.

[thoughtgypsy]

What is the purpose of encouraging the rise of athiesm? Why is it so glorified in academia and pop culture, while Christianity is ridiculed and hunted down in the legal system? For one, athiesm breaks the notion of an unchanging moral standard. The moral standard becomes fluid and is open to perversion and control.

We become our own judge of our actions, and we lose our humility. We descend into a state of selfish hedonism where the main goal is looking out for number one. The bonds between others grow weaker. Society grows more atomized, weaker, easier to control. The pursuit of selfish interests, when left unchecked, can become intoxicating, and lead to the suffering of others when it furthers one's own interests. It leaves open the door for evil to take root.

If anyone is interested, I would highly recommend Alexander Solzenitsyn's Templeon address titled "Men Have Forgotten God". He was a former officer in the Soviet Military, and later an historian who survived 25 years of torture and hard labor in the Gulags. He underwent the most brutal tests to his spirit, and through many years of reflection and research, believes that evil can only flourish in a society that elevates material concerns above the spiritual. I will post a few excerpts below:

Quote:

More than half a century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of older people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.

Since then I have spent well-nigh fifty years working on the history of our Revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval. But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous Revolution that swallowed up some sixty million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: Men have forgotten God; that's why all this has happened.

...

The failings of human consciousness, deprived of its divine dimension, have been a determining factor in all the major crimes of this century. The first of these was World War I, and much of our present predicament can be traced back to it. It was a war (the memory of which seems to be fading) when Europe, bursting with health and abundance, fell into a rage of self-mutilation which could not but sap its strength for a century or more, and perhaps forever. The only possible explanation for this war is a mental eclipse among the leaders of Europe due to their lost awareness of a Supreme Power above them. Only a godless embitterment could have moved ostensibly Christian states to employ poison gas, a weapon so obviously beyond the limits of humanity.

Today' s world has reached a stage which, if it had been described to preceding centuries, would have called forth the cry: "This is the Apocalypse!"

Yet we have grown used to this kind of world; we even feel at home in it.

"Men Have Forgotten God": http://www.roca.org/OA/36/36h.htm

[Tokyo Joe]

Totally understandable that the reality of Hollywood's dark Satanic underside is mind-blowing to people who have not had a peek behind the curtain, as it were.

In my own case, my mind was utterly destroyed when I first learned the truth of Hollywood in connection with a very specific film.

There was this movie -- and maybe some of you have seen it -- that came out back in 1994, Nobody's Fool. When I first saw it I was in dumbstruck awe of its beautiful slice-of-life portrayal of an Everyman, played by Paul Newman, who was then just turning 70. Everything about this film had a wholesome-seeming all-American quality to it: From the cast -- Newman, Jessica Tandy at the very end of her life, Bruce Willis, Melanie Griffith, Dylan Walsh, Josef Sommer, Pruitt Taylor Vince, many others -- to the setting in the snow-socked fictional town of North Bath in upstate New York (it was actually shot in the Hudson valley towns of Beacon/Fishkill/Balmville), to the simple and touching all-American stories of everyday life as it truly is in this modest little town...

In a way it had come to be one of my favorite movies, one I would return to almost yearly at a certain time in the dead of winter. Yeah, well, that was until I happened to meet someone who was connected to a sheriff's department in one of those New York towns where the film was shot. Although it was effectively hushed up, it was a poorly guarded secret that almost every single day after the shooting wrapped up, Newman, Willis, Walsh, Vince and some other cast members would go on the prowl in the surrounding neighborhoods in a big white windowless rape van. They would snatch young boys off the streets and do unspeakable things to them -- all while old Jessica Tandy drove the van around the back roads. She may have been 85 years old but she was a wily one when it came to evading the local cops.

Of course, word of what was going on slowly leaked out and it was only hushed up when the bigwigs at Paramount (that was the studio that did the film) swooped in with the huge sacks of cash and paid off all the right people, high and low. The movie, which did not cost much to make, grossed something like $50 million but it turned out in the red for the studio, just because of all the hush money that had to be spread around. (Next time you hear about some blockbuster raking it in at the box office, don't forgot the untold millions that likely had to be paid out under similar circumstances.)

And you know what the sickest part of this whole deal was? This was one of Philip Seymour Hoffman's first big Hollywood films -- he was only 25 years old at the time. Apparently he was shocked and devastated by what was going on, and couldn't cope with it. As an escape from this horror, he started shooting heroin, a habit which caught up with him in 2014. He was a decent man though and never joined in those rape van rides.

Needless to say, I have never really been able to enjoy a Hollywood film after that. Makes you wonder what guys like Jimmy Stewart, James Mason, John Wayne, Gary Cooper got up to back in the day...