I don't why I get into debates with this woman. She is pretty smart actually, but she is dogmatic leftist that it's ridiculous. Her comments here summarize what modern feminism is though:
Basically her attitude in the comment is that women are helpless and weak and that the great and powerful state has to be there to help them out. It's kind of sad, because she is a smart person on the whole. I know her from an atheist group I've associated with.
Quote:Quote:
Also, I think Libertarian/conservative phrases such as "Nanny state" or any rhetoric that refers to government-funded and/or run social services as parental in a disparaging way are chauvinistic and as a woman I deeply resent that sort of language. The vast majority of women throughout history and still the majority of women today have had our livelihoods at least partially supported by parents and husbands. This has been because of conditions mostly out of our control, including the reality that we're the sex that incubate and more typically do most of the rearing of the upcoming generation - without any compensation other than weak sentiments of appreciation such as the holiday of "Mothers Day". Government aid such as public schools, libraries, unemployment, subsidized day care, food assistance, and welfare have all helped primarily women, especially mothers be more financially secure and more financially independent. It is an over-dependence on the free market system and lack of government services that forces too many women to be dependent on others to survive.
Basically her attitude in the comment is that women are helpless and weak and that the great and powerful state has to be there to help them out. It's kind of sad, because she is a smart person on the whole. I know her from an atheist group I've associated with.