Posts: 215
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2014
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 03:19 PM
Without showing disrespect to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, these countires at the moment have no one who is better then anyone in the current England team. The only exception is Gareth Bale of Wales.
About English Premier League blooding English youngsters, that is not going to happen. Most of the Premier League teams are owned by rich foreign business people who have no absolutely interest in the England national team. They just want to fill their clubs with ready made, highly skilled foreign talent to win trophies and make money by tapping into the tv broadcast revenue.
Posts: 2,051
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
30
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 03:52 PM
I only just noticed Belgium's abundance of talent the other day - I rate them as a chance :
Jan Vertonghen, Mousa Dembele, Nacer Chadli all play at Spurs.
Kevin De Bruyne, Romelu Lukaku and Eden Hazard are with Chelsea.
Thibaut Courtois with Atletico Madrid
Vincent Kompany (Belgium captain) is Manchester City captain.
Posts: 825
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
12
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 09:28 PM
I have a serious question for any and all soccer er football fanatics.
How good could the US team become if we had some of our best athletes go into or come up playing soccer? Instead of the rejects who can't play football, basketball, baseball or even hockey.
Would it matter?
Everyone I grew up with and now their kids quit playing soccer around age 8 or 9 when a more interesting, well-liked sports catches their eye.
Posts: 4,481
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 09:43 PM
USA would do very well - they are not far off already.
The problem is that the MLS is run diiferently to leagues elsewhere.
You have to have big clubs that dominate every year - in order to attract the best players in the world.
The problem would be not being able to play in the Champion's League though...
Posts: 107
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2013
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 10:04 PM
Quote: (05-18-2014 09:28 PM)HeyPete Wrote:
I have a serious question for any and all soccer er football fanatics.
How good could the US team become if we had some of our best athletes go into or come up playing soccer? Instead of the rejects who can't play football, basketball, baseball or even hockey.
Would it matter?
Everyone I grew up with and now their kids quit playing soccer around age 8 or 9 when a more interesting, well-liked sports catches their eye.
Don't know exactly how good the US would be, but the athleticism would be off the charts compared to what it is now. I recently had the chance to play on a practice squad in a scrimmage against a major Div 1 NCAA squad, and I pretty regularly play hoop with/against a bunch of guys on the (american) football squad (they made one of the BCS bowl games this season). Comparing them there is a huge gap in athleticism. The (american) football players are just bigger, faster, and stronger.
I also had the misfortune in Jr High of being stuck behind a guy who went on to make an NBA squad (no minutes for me). The guy was an absolute freak athlete. He was dunking on a 10 ft regulation hoop when we were 12 years old. I remember practices being like going against a grown ass man
Posts: 15,023
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
216
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 10:12 PM
Quote: (05-18-2014 09:43 PM)cardguy Wrote:
USA would do very well - they are not far off already.
The problem is that the MLS is run diiferently to leagues elsewhere.
You have to have big clubs that dominate every year - in order to attract the best players in the world.
The problem would be not being able to play in the Champion's League though...
MLS has got the right idea. The European model (pro/rel + absence of financial balance) isn't sustainable in the USA. The Americans could do it and have a couple of huge clubs, but the league they play in would die sooner rather than later (this aside from the fact that they'd have nobody to play - they're in the USA, not Western Europe). This is what happened to the American top-flight leagues that preceded MLS, and it is the lessons learned from those failures that governs MLS' financially cautious approach. They're being proven right - MLS is healthier as a top flight league than any predecessor has been and will last much longer.
Know your enemy and know yourself, find naught in fear for 100 battles. Know yourself but not your enemy, find level of loss and victory. Know thy enemy but not yourself, wallow in defeat every time.
Posts: 825
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
12
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 11:16 PM
Thanks for the answers.
I always want the US to do well in the World Cup, but I know it takes a huge commitment. You can't just throw a team together.
But, I think I'm like a lot of US sports fans. I will watch the US games in the World Cup -- if they are winning. If they get down 3-0 or something I'll change the channel, because I much rather watch a regular season baseball game or whatever is in season when the world cup is played, than see the US lose.
And I won't watch Belgium vs. Poland or Italy against Russia. Even if you paid me. I just can't muster any interest.
I wish the US could field a world class team, but I know I'm part of the problem.
Posts: 4,481
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 11:47 PM
I used to laugh at Americans for not being interested in soccer.
But as I get older - and my interest wanes a little - I can see where they are coming from.
Football is so random. The manager has little ability to influence what goes on during a match in the way he does in US sports.
And it is incredibly how often luck or a bad referring decision costs the team a match. In about half the games I see - the other team could easily have won if they had had a couple of breaks which went with them and not against them.
Then there are the games that never spark to life - or in which little is at stake. They can be pretty dull. I pretty much just limit myself to the biggest football games now - since a big part of football is the tension that develops when the team knows that one mistake could destroy their entire season.
I also sense the majority of football fans are losing interest in the game. The reason I say this is because most of the discussion in football these days are about what happens off the pitch (bad decisions, racial incidents, disciplinary actions, club takeovers, new contracts, controversial statements from managers, transfer rumours, sendings off, bad injuries, players falling out with each other and the manager - and the continuing narrative about which manager is most likely to be fired next).
None of this was really in the game until about 20 years ago. And it has only gotten worse with each passing season.
It is a bad sign when what happens off the pitch is more exciting than on the pitch. Particularly when it is blatantly obvious that the footballers think the fans are stupid for being so loyal - and when they couldn't really care less about the clubs they play for.
I feel football is going the way of boxing...
Posts: 4,481
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-18-2014, 11:51 PM
It is funny that America has such a left-wing socialist redistribution model when it comes to the administration of their sports.
Posts: 15,023
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation:
216
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-19-2014, 12:50 AM
Quote: (05-18-2014 11:48 PM)Lufty Wrote:
The main issue the MLS has to tackle is that in Europe the top clubs generally stay good. You rarely have the issue of having good players on bad teams for long. ( Klove on the timberwolves etc) as a player that sort of stability is great for maximizing your shot at winning over your short career. The American sport draft + trade system makes for interesting reporting and a more balanced league but when there are viable alternatives as a player it's less appealing.
All this really means is that MLS teams will have a harder time attracting elite young players than major clubs in top European leagues. That's something MLS can live with. The draft/trade/salary cap/franchise system would have to be done away with entirely for any MLS team to have a chance of attracting the kind of stars necessary to rival top European sides, and that would essentially spell the end of the league (it would become insolvent very quickly). By keeping the stable system in place MLS ensures its own survival and still gives itself a chance to expand (increasing salaries later on) and attract good talent (top Euro clubs don't get all of the world's solid players).
Quote: (05-18-2014 11:51 PM)cardguy Wrote:
It is funny that America has such a left-wing socialist redistribution model when it comes to the administration of their sports.
The irony really is that the model survives due to capitalist motives: the franchise system and the forced parity generally have been shown to be highly profitable, more so than the less stable club systems elsewhere in the world. The most heavily represented leagues in the world's top 50 most valuable sports teams are American: 30 of them in the NFL, and more in each of the NBA and MLB than in any individual European football league.
Fans like parity and stability tends to be good for a league (especially when it comes to earning the big media/sponsorship deals). Americans don't hold to their system because of its fairness, they hold to it because it is profitable. They tried alternatives (the NFL, for example, used to lack a salary cap prior to the 90's and big teams once predictably dominated the league) and abandoned them for the current "socialist" model because it mints money. Simple as that.
Know your enemy and know yourself, find naught in fear for 100 battles. Know yourself but not your enemy, find level of loss and victory. Know thy enemy but not yourself, wallow in defeat every time.
Posts: 1,458
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2013
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-19-2014, 06:38 PM
undefined
Posts: 1,458
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2013
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-19-2014, 06:40 PM
^^^^ This is the Coca Cola Spanish version:
Posts: 241
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2013
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-19-2014, 07:14 PM
Quote: (05-18-2014 09:28 PM)HeyPete Wrote:
I have a serious question for any and all soccer er football fanatics.
How good could the US team become if we had some of our best athletes go into or come up playing soccer? Instead of the rejects who can't play football, basketball, baseball or even hockey.
Would it matter?
Everyone I grew up with and now their kids quit playing soccer around age 8 or 9 when a more interesting, well-liked sports catches their eye.
Strangely enough, a lot of people that aren't American (and a lot of people that are for that matter) couldn't give a fuck if the USA is or isn't any good at soccer.
You could ask the same question of India: how good would our soccer team be if we didn't have cricket?
Or of South African: how good would our soccer team be if we didn't have rugby union?
Or of Japan: how good would our soccer team be if we didn't have sumo?
Or of Ethiopia: how good would our soccer team be if we didn't have long-distance running?
People play because they have a passion for the game and there are insanely talented people everywhere - Christian Karembu from New Caledonia is one (now retired) soccer example I can think of.
If soccer were more popular in the USA I'm sure they would have a better team, but it's not so speculating about it is irrelevant. I will acknowledge however that the USA does have training facilities and opportunities that are second to none.
Posts: 712
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation:
4
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-20-2014, 02:53 AM
I'm obviously rooting for my country and Croatia, but I'll put my money on Germany.
Posts: 1,091
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2012
World Cup 2014 Thread
05-22-2014, 08:13 PM
Surprised to see Donavan left out of the US WC squad.