[Feisbook Control]

(04-16-2014 02:25 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Within a hundred years you will be able to pick your kid's , skin color, nose shape, IQ, athletic ability, eye shape, facial beauty, etc etc.

All this talk will then become moot.

Of course, doesn't that beg the question of what people would look like then? Certain ethnicities would disappear overnight (assuming everyone had the money to do this).

[Samseau]

(04-15-2014 01:49 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 01:28 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 05:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Although they were different from Northern Europeans, the "Mediterranean Man" was still a breed of white man.

Yes, a "breed" of white man.

They have been "bred" with other races.

Mediterraneans of are mixed with Arab, North African, etc.

(04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Of course there must be Arab blood in me.

(04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I believe this because around 10% of my family has a mixed color.

It sounds like you are quite a mix if races and cultures..

You should do one of those DNA tests and get the exact percentages..

If Samseau has Arab blood in him, then he very likely has some black in him too. Though I'm sure he'll be quite disturbed to hear that.

Not disturbed at all. Black where it counts.

[All or Nothing]

(04-17-2014 02:20 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Not disturbed at all. Black where it counts.

[speakeasy]

(04-17-2014 02:20 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 01:49 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 01:28 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

(04-15-2014 05:45 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Although they were different from Northern Europeans, the "Mediterranean Man" was still a breed of white man.

Yes, a "breed" of white man.

They have been "bred" with other races.

Mediterraneans of are mixed with Arab, North African, etc.

(04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Of course there must be Arab blood in me.

(04-14-2014 04:52 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I believe this because around 10% of my family has a mixed color.

It sounds like you are quite a mix if races and cultures..

You should do one of those DNA tests and get the exact percentages..

If Samseau has Arab blood in him, then he very likely has some black in him too. Though I'm sure he'll be quite disturbed to hear that.

Not disturbed at all. Black where it counts.

J/k, j/k...

[Samseau]

(04-15-2014 07:04 AM)Moma Wrote:  

(04-14-2014 05:18 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

They are qualitatively different. Going to a country gives pleasure while reading gives knowledge.

People who claim that merely traveling is enough probably don't read much, or aren't very good at reading.

I have been Europe before, Iceland/London/Many Cities in France, the DR, Canada (but who cares), and all over the USA's east coast.

And I can say unequivocally reading about these places taught me far more than traveling there.

Ah, an epistemology discussion. You're wading deep into my territory, friend.

Quote:

Learning is a multi sense experience. You learn through touch, smell, taste, sight and doing.

Not only are the five sense incomplete, as they cannot give a complete picture of the world (can we really hear all sounds? see all the colors? distinguish between all the smells?), but all sense experience is processed by our cognitive faculties (commonly called the brain) which itself portrays information according to previous expectations and biases.

Thus nothing is unbiased.

Quote:

By travelling to other countries, you engage all those senses and you involve a total learning experience than reading about it.

But without any prior knowledge, you will not be able to interpret your sense data in any meaningful way.

For example, people studied plants and animals for thousands of years before Darwin. But before Darwin, no one really understood the plants and animals they were looking at because they lacked a comprehensive theoretical framework to interpret their sense data.

Quote:

When you read, you are limited to the bias and intent of the person writing it. When you experience it personally, you get exposed to the most honest bias of all, reality.

False. The biases of a writer are no more significant than the biases of the reader who is reading them. Calling a writer biased is trivial because everyone has biases.

Thus when you experience reality, you are still interpreting reality through your own biases. It's not honest at all.

Quote:

I say travel relating to a person who actually goes into the country and interacts with the people and their way of doing things, not to some glorified Western resort.

Having historical knowledge gives you a baseline to fill in some of the gaps..but those gaps would be gaping if you only had book knowledge to go by vs actual experience.

I agree that Western resorts are trash. But you've got it backwards. Travel fills in the gaps, whereas books provide you with the main course of information to really understand something.

While true that many books have been written by whites, you must also remember that whites are a notoriously divided people who constantly question each other. So by reading a book, one must be careful to choose the right selection of books with conflicting viewpoints in order to acquire the wisdom of billions of men condensed down into the pages of history.

And the simple fact of the matter is that your personal experience can never match the experiences of billions of men condensed down through the pages of history. This is why people say the written word is the most powerful influence in the world; the pen is mightier than the sword, etc. etc.

[clever alias]

you can learn way more by travelling to a place than by reading about it. if you go to x place and really stick yourself in a culture, talk to the locals, and get off the beaten path

[Samseau]

(04-17-2014 04:23 PM)clever alias Wrote:  

you can learn way more by travelling to a place than by reading about it. if you go to x place and really stick yourself in a culture, talk to the locals, and get off the beaten path

In reality, you know far less than you think you do, and you think you're special because you've done more than your friends back at home have.

When in reality, you're multiple times less informed than a well-read man.

That said - the number one man is the one who travels and reads.

[clever alias]

(04-17-2014 04:41 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-17-2014 04:23 PM)clever alias Wrote:  

you can learn way more by travelling to a place than by reading about it. if you go to x place and really stick yourself in a culture, talk to the locals, and get off the beaten path

In reality, you know far less than you think you do, and you think you're special because you've done more than your friends back at home have.

When in reality, you're multiple times less informed than a well-read man.

That said - the number one man is the one who travels and reads.

Gotcha, so I read a bunch of books about Poland, and I know more than the people that go there, even if they read no books? That's comforting, here I was thinking that first hand experiences are more important than reading someone else's interpretation of things.

[Sourcecode]

Samseau...You do realize..the more you write..the less credible you seem...
You should really just let this whole thing go..

[Samseau]

(04-17-2014 11:16 PM)clever alias Wrote:  

(04-17-2014 04:41 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-17-2014 04:23 PM)clever alias Wrote:  

you can learn way more by travelling to a place than by reading about it. if you go to x place and really stick yourself in a culture, talk to the locals, and get off the beaten path

In reality, you know far less than you think you do, and you think you're special because you've done more than your friends back at home have.

When in reality, you're multiple times less informed than a well-read man.

That said - the number one man is the one who travels and reads.

Gotcha, so I read a bunch of books about Poland, and I know more than the people that go there, even if they read no books? That's comforting, here I was thinking that first hand experiences are more important than reading someone else's interpretation of things.

Straw-man.

[MrLemon]

(04-11-2014 04:45 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

Oh crap Dusty that's a sweet GIF. Thank you.

[MrLemon]

My family is all white and asian mixes. We live in California and Hawaii where race isn't even noticed and nobody cares about it at all.

When we hear people comment on color or race, it sounds like some kind of idiotic babble, like something you'd hear a crazy homeless guy ranting from his cardboard box under the freeway.

[Samseau]

(04-18-2014 11:28 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

My family is all white and asian mixes. We live in California and Hawaii where race isn't even noticed and nobody cares about it at all.

Funny you say that. I was just swing dancing with a woman the other night who told me she left Hawaii because of how racist they were toward her for being white.

[speakeasy]

(04-18-2014 11:42 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 11:28 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

My family is all white and asian mixes. We live in California and Hawaii where race isn't even noticed and nobody cares about it at all.

Funny you say that. I was just swing dancing with a woman the other night who told me she left Hawaii because of how racist they were toward her for being white.

That's what happens when you steal their land. You'd probably get the same treatment at an Indian reservation.

[KorbenDallas]

I like Samseau. I've been drinking, so, I can't make a good point, but everyone attempts to pick on Samseau simply because he speaks the truth. For such a red pill forum there sure are a lot of people who accept the media's programming.

[Samseau]

(04-18-2014 11:48 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 11:42 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 11:28 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

My family is all white and asian mixes. We live in California and Hawaii where race isn't even noticed and nobody cares about it at all.

Funny you say that. I was just swing dancing with a woman the other night who told me she left Hawaii because of how racist they were toward her for being white.

That's what happens when you steal their land. You'd probably get the same treatment at an Indian reservation.

That's exactly right. She told me that even after 6 years of living there, the natives still made her feel like an outsider through racial slurs, discrimination against her socially, and work-related as well.

Just more proof against diversity. I was honestly surprised to hear that talk come from a woman of New England descent, most of the people around here are extremely blue-pill brainwashed. But she was on the older side (looked about 31), so I guess she had finally cast off her university indoctrination. She probably also had a few bad relationships with the local men (pump and dumped!), and now she tells strangers that she left Hawaii because it was racist.

[Samseau]

I really teased the shit out of her though to get this info. "You left a tropical paradise for shitty New England snow??"

"Yeah the weather was nice but the people not so much."

"What do you mean?"

"They were kinda racist?"

"Really? Tell me more."

[Sp5]

(04-18-2014 12:08 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 11:48 AM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 11:42 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-18-2014 11:28 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  

My family is all white and asian mixes. We live in California and Hawaii where race isn't even noticed and nobody cares about it at all.

Funny you say that. I was just swing dancing with a woman the other night who told me she left Hawaii because of how racist they were toward her for being white.

That's what happens when you steal their land. You'd probably get the same treatment at an Indian reservation.

That's exactly right. She told me that even after 6 years of living there, the natives still made her feel like an outsider through racial slurs, discrimination against her socially, and work-related as well.

Just more proof against diversity. I was honestly surprised to hear that talk come from a woman of New England descent, most of the people around here are extremely blue-pill brainwashed. But she was on the older side (looked about 31), so I guess she had finally cast off her university indoctrination. She probably also had a few bad relationships with the local men (pump and dumped!), and now she tells strangers that she left Hawaii because it was racist.

A white guy I know who was in the Army there said he would regularly hear "get off my beach haole" at Waikiki.

[speakeasy]

Me and a buddy were a bit lost near north shore Oahu. We accidentally wandered into this town that was all natives. I still vividly remember the dirty looks we were getting. Like being a blood accidentally driving into crip turf or something. My friend was driving and I was like, man let's get the hell out of here.

We also saw a bunch of natives beat the shit out of a black dude outside a club. My friend heard them yelling something that sounded like a racial epithet.

[kosko]

*scratches Hawaii off travel list*
....

*writes "So Cal for Polynesian broads instead"*

[speakeasy]

(04-18-2014 01:39 PM)kosko Wrote:  

*scratches Hawaii off travel list*
....

*writes "So Cal for Polynesian broads instead"*

Don't let that stop you. I didn't experience any racism personally.

Hawaii is real nice as far as beaches, scenery, weather. It's beautiful out there. I don't think I'd go out there solely for girls. But if you have day game there's plenty of tourist girls around from mainland white girls to Japanese enjoying a tropical holiday.

[Libertas]

Just the typical politically correct trash.

With regards to why this is a "bad" thing:

My highest preference in a female is a blonde, blue-eyed lady. Perhaps that's a bit cliche, but it has been that way for me for as far back as I can remember. Some other people might have different preferences, but those are mine.

I want those women to continue to exist in the future. I don't want to see a boring world where every single person looks the same.

Now, I really could care less if people want to date interracially (I myself just approached a hot Asian girl today). But I will tell you this: I would never willingly have children with a woman that was not white. Why? I want to see the diversity of phenotypes continue to propagate forward, and not get absorbed into a dull, one-dimensional world, the only seeming praise of which is the left-wing wet dream that now everybody's equal. Equally boring.

[speakeasy]

^^^ So supposed all the women on earth were blonde haired and blue eyed? Would that bother you?

Why does anyone give a shit what the human race will look like tens of thousands of years from now long after we're dead? The races we have now didn't exist 20,000 years ago. And even if nobody mixed, the races would still look completely different in the future than they do now. Humans are constantly evolving. Races aren't fixed. Even when they don't mix, they will eventually change into something else over time. That's why the notion of preserving races is laughable. Early humans looked like the Geico caveman. To people 20,000 years in the future we may look as ugly to them as the Geico man looks to us. We didn't stop evolving, we're still evolving and the way we look now isn't how we'll look in the future.

I mean, do what you want. I'm not trying to judge. But it's such a strange notion to me that some people would toss aside a completely compatible woman(that they are actually attracted to) jover something completely theoretical.

I'm just expressing my opinion, but I don't care. I honestly don't give a fuck what happens to the black race in 10,000 years or what they look like. That doesn't mean I hate what I am or don't care about black people. I just don't give a damn how it all shakes out in the end. I'll be long dead. And the people in the future won't miss what they've never seen any way. So I'm supposed to decide on a woman based on that?

[Screwston]

I would think the white guys in America, who are so crazy over keeping it pure, would want children with an Anglo of the same ancestry. Not just a white girl who could be mixed with all kinds of things.

[MrLemon]

(04-18-2014 12:09 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

I really teased the shit out of her though to get this info. "You left a tropical paradise for shitty New England snow??"

"Yeah the weather was nice but the people not so much."

"What do you mean?"

"They were kinda racist?"

"Really? Tell me more."

Oh yah, sure there is that kind of talk but it's still lurking in the corners. But it's not about race really. It's more a hawaii native-born hating on anybody who isn't local and dirt poor.

I still maintain, if you're in California or Hawaii, the racial mixing is so common, that people stop even noticing. In the sf bay area it's indians, white, hispanic, japanese, and chinese, and everybody is marrying everybody. It's never about race any more. It's more about what socio economic class you're in.