The most useful chart ever.
Sociosexuality is basically a measure of how open one is to casual sex, a higher score meaning more casual sex.
Sex ratio is the ratio of men/women. A score of 100 means equal amounts of men and women. A lower score means more women than men, and a higher score means more men than women.
So bassically, Taiwan is no dice, and the baltics look real nice, and Mixx's Slovenia reccomendation looks pretty dead on.
Not surprisingly, more men seems to mean less promiscuity. Naturally, when women are scarce, men value them more as long-term partners. When there are extra women around, men play the field.
The full study includes more great info, such as rates of ''poaching'' mates, and the difference between male and female sociosexuality in these countries: http://psych.mcmaster.ca/dalywilson/comm...chmitt.pdf
Sociosexuality is basically a measure of how open one is to casual sex, a higher score meaning more casual sex.
Sex ratio is the ratio of men/women. A score of 100 means equal amounts of men and women. A lower score means more women than men, and a higher score means more men than women.
So bassically, Taiwan is no dice, and the baltics look real nice, and Mixx's Slovenia reccomendation looks pretty dead on.
Not surprisingly, more men seems to mean less promiscuity. Naturally, when women are scarce, men value them more as long-term partners. When there are extra women around, men play the field.
The full study includes more great info, such as rates of ''poaching'' mates, and the difference between male and female sociosexuality in these countries: http://psych.mcmaster.ca/dalywilson/comm...chmitt.pdf