Quote: (10-29-2013 12:58 PM)basilransom Wrote:
Jay, after thinking about it, I realized that pasteurization and industrial dairy production go hand in hand. When you produce dairy on an industrial scale, at the lowest possible cost, you start creating an environment where bacteria can reach dangerous levels, with the cow sitting in its own feces all day. All these 'safety' measures are essential to ensure animal products aren't outright poisonous, because the animals are raised in such unsanitary conditions. It's like boiling urine to make it potable - it probably won't kill you at that point, but do you really want to be drinking it?
BR:
I agree with you that various parts of the whole industrial food production system is designed around the creation of only marginally safe produce - and possibly little to no nutritional value. So a question that I have been asking lately is whether I am getting any nutritional benefit from the product that I am eating (that potentially has been processed).
I do believe that we get some nutritional benefits from full fat milk or heavy cream (even if it has been processed), but NOT so much nutritional value from the skimmed versions - b/c when you take out the fat, then the affect on your body is nearly the same as drinking a soda - additionally, some people have bad tolerance to various milk products, and that bad tolerance is likely due to the processing of the products and taking out the nutritional value.
To kind of repeat myself, a similar situation exists with the irradiation of some vegetables. At this point, we do NOT really know the extent to which our vegetables are being irradiated b/c there is no requirement to label them as irradiated. And, maybe it is only leafy vegetables? I am NOT sure b/c it is NOT easy to keep up with all of the various skeeming that occurs in order that big companies can screw us in various ways in order to generate additional profits. But if certain vegetables are irradiated without our knowledge, then that irradiation will kill the vegetable and take away some of the nutritional benefit of eating a food that we had thought was raw - back to the analogy of drinking boiled piss, I suppose.
![[Image: smile.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/smile.gif)
However, that reminds me of the claims about boiling water versus microwaving it. I thought that mythbusters was going to do a show on this microwaving versus boiling ( and whether I believe mainstream media?) Anyhow, some of the thoughts on microwaving is that if you feed plants cooled down water that has been boiled then the plants will do better on that water as compared with giving them microwaved water that has been cooled. Then the question is about the ruining of the molecular structure of the water by microwaving it, which may also apply to other foods.