[JimNortonFan]

http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive...ll/277429/

The usual. We know all this and see it repackaged in some form palatable to the masses.


Some Blue Pill Gems that need a Manosphere Man to interpret:

FTA:

Bergner dismisses evolutionary biology, bizarrely equating it with fundamentalist Christianity. But he gives a wonderful example of it in action when he presents the case of Isabel, a lawyer in her early thirties whose sex life with her boyfriend falls flat, a defect in their relationship that does not prevent her from agreeing to marry him. "The issue was that despite his good looks, his intelligence, his kindness, and his skill in bed, she rarely wanted to make love with him," writes Bergner.

Isabel may have craved better sex with her boyfriend-turned-fiancé, but she ultimately decides that she could live without it. After all, Isabel's relationship with her previous boyfriend Michael, a man ten years older than her, was far more erotic, Bergner tells us. But Isabel broke it off. Why? "The relationship with Michael had ended only because she understood he would never commit to her, never marry her or even live with her."

JNF:

Isabel is pining for the alpha pumps the older player used to give her but she's approaching the wall and wants Beta lawyer bucks.


FTA:

The book, What Do Women Want, is based on a 2009 article, which received a lot of buzz for detailing, among other things, that women get turned on when they watch monkeys having sex and gay men having sex, a pattern of arousal not seen in otherwise lusty heterosexual men.

JNF:

Giggity


FTA:

Detailing the results of a study about sexual arousal, Bergner says: "No matter what their self-proclaimed sexual orientation, [women] showed, on the whole, strong and swift genital arousal when the screen offered men with men, women with women and women with men. They responded objectively much more to the exercising woman than to the strolling man, and their blood flow rose quickly--and markedly, though to a lesser degree than during all the human scenes except the footage of the ambling, strapping man--as they watched the apes."

JNF:



Giggity giggity goo

[Kickb]

They got a snaggletooth to bite her bottom lip

[ColSpanker]

The Atlantic used to be a good magazine. Makes me wonder who bought it.

[WestIndianArchie]

So if I start trawling cross fit competitions, I can scoop a 6 pack honey cause she's staring @ other 6 pack honeys?

*starts flipping tires*

[MrXY]

Don't have time to read the article but it sounds like the same female arousal study Roissy discussed years ago. Not only were women turned on by a much broader range of sexual images than men, the most fascinating part to me was that they didn't know they were as turned on as they were-their self rating of their arousal varied widely from the actual arousal measured by the instrument.

If it's the same study the researcher actually said that it's as if women's brains aren't connected to their vaginas, which I though was a pretty daring non-PC statement.

This is a very important point that players understand intuitively from experience, and to me this understanding is one of the markers that separates a man skilled at seducing women from the average beta. They know that what women say or even what they are thinking to themselves in their higher brain is often very different from what the more ancient part of their brain is thinking. That's why paying attention to a girl's body language and her behavior is far more accurate than listening to what she says. If you can get her in a sexual mood her reptilian brain will take over. How many times have you heard a girl say " I can't believe we're doing this" or afterwards "I can't believe I did that". They're not lying-her lower brain took over and decided to have sex with you.

[Grit]

Wait, women get wet and horny when you slap and choke them? The female sex drive also has lots of female rape fantasies? I must have skimmed past the author writing about these utterly banal NORMAL parts of the female sex drive.

I smell a bullshit political agenda in this article. How about the author write about those NORMAL parts of the female sex drive, eh?