"...it's the quiet cool...it's for someone who's been through the struggle and come out on the other side smelling like money and pussy."
"put her in the taxi, put her number in the trash can"
Quote: (05-03-2013 10:40 AM)Gator_McKlusky Wrote:
My mother was/is a huge nerd, but broke off an engagement when my dad started chasing her. That said, I'm sticking with that she has had sex twice in her life - to make me and my brother - and she didn't enjoy it either time. Yup, that's what happened.
Quote: (05-03-2013 11:16 AM)Power_Ranger Wrote:
My dad was a player according to my mother, he and his brother hit up the town plenty in his day as a teen/early 20s. He grew up in the city of Manchester so he had plenty of prospects but my mum told him to get lost on the few occasions he flirted with her.
My dad realised that chasing easy lays wasn't what he truly wanted and he put effort into dating my mum and here we are today and not divorced. My dad was her only guy 100%.
Quote: (05-04-2013 05:39 AM)gamepadawan Wrote:
Have any of you guys read anything at hooking up smart? It's hilarious Susan Walsh is adamant that only some retarded figure like 10 percent of women are carousel riders. It's hilarious because she had a gang of partners and would have had way more if she hadn't gotten married. I don't know why rooshv forum members haven't trolled her hard. Her red pill knowledge is very minimal.
Quote: (05-04-2013 05:39 AM)gamepadawan Wrote:
Have any of you guys read anything at hooking up smart? It's hilarious Susan Walsh is adamant that only some retarded figure like 10 percent of women are carousel riders. It's hilarious because she had a gang of partners and would have had way more if she hadn't gotten married. I don't know why rooshv forum members haven't trolled her hard. Her red pill knowledge is very minimal.
Quote: (05-04-2013 11:28 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:
Quote: (05-04-2013 05:39 AM)gamepadawan Wrote:
Have any of you guys read anything at hooking up smart? It's hilarious Susan Walsh is adamant that only some retarded figure like 10 percent of women are carousel riders. It's hilarious because she had a gang of partners and would have had way more if she hadn't gotten married. I don't know why rooshv forum members haven't trolled her hard. Her red pill knowledge is very minimal.
It's not so much about the number as much as what you consider a carousel rider. For example, is a woman with 1 partner a year a carousel rider? How about 2? 0.5?
My criteria are rather strict there - just a few partners is enough to permanently wreak havoc on a woman's psyche, so while I would not consider a woman with 0.5 partners a year (say, 5 by age 25) a slut by any means, I would still consider just as potentially damaged as sluts. Whether that makes her a carousel rider, I still don't know.
The beauty of today's feminist culture, similar to the endless Democrat-Republican conflict, is that it lets us fight over the number rather than the mentality that actually causes the damage.
That's why I think that my Jerk Reward Score (JRS) is a better measure of how damaged a woman is for serious relationships.
Quote: (05-04-2013 11:28 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:
Quote: (05-04-2013 05:39 AM)gamepadawan Wrote:
Have any of you guys read anything at hooking up smart? It's hilarious Susan Walsh is adamant that only some retarded figure like 10 percent of women are carousel riders. It's hilarious because she had a gang of partners and would have had way more if she hadn't gotten married. I don't know why rooshv forum members haven't trolled her hard. Her red pill knowledge is very minimal.
It's not so much about the number as much as what you consider a carousel rider. For example, is a woman with 1 partner a year a carousel rider? How about 2? 0.5?
My criteria are rather strict there - just a few partners is enough to permanently wreak havoc on a woman's psyche, so while I would not consider a woman with 0.5 partners a year (say, 5 by age 25) a slut by any means, I would still consider just as potentially damaged as sluts. Whether that makes her a carousel rider, I still don't know.
The beauty of today's feminist culture, similar to the endless Democrat-Republican conflict, is that it lets us fight over the number rather than the mentality that actually causes the damage.
That's why I think that my Jerk Reward Score (JRS) is a better measure of how damaged a woman is for serious relationships.
Quote: (05-04-2013 11:28 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:
Quote: (05-04-2013 05:39 AM)gamepadawan Wrote:
Have any of you guys read anything at hooking up smart? It's hilarious Susan Walsh is adamant that only some retarded figure like 10 percent of women are carousel riders. It's hilarious because she had a gang of partners and would have had way more if she hadn't gotten married. I don't know why rooshv forum members haven't trolled her hard. Her red pill knowledge is very minimal.
It's not so much about the number as much as what you consider a carousel rider. For example, is a woman with 1 partner a year a carousel rider? How about 2? 0.5?
My criteria are rather strict there - just a few partners is enough to permanently wreak havoc on a woman's psyche, so while I would not consider a woman with 0.5 partners a year (say, 5 by age 25) a slut by any means, I would still consider just as potentially damaged as sluts. Whether that makes her a carousel rider, I still don't know.
The beauty of today's feminist culture, similar to the endless Democrat-Republican conflict, is that it lets us fight over the number rather than the mentality that actually causes the damage.
That's why I think that my Jerk Reward Score (JRS) is a better measure of how damaged a woman is for serious relationships.
Quote: (05-07-2013 12:59 PM)scotian Wrote:
Quote: (05-04-2013 11:28 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:
Quote: (05-04-2013 05:39 AM)gamepadawan Wrote:
Have any of you guys read anything at hooking up smart? It's hilarious Susan Walsh is adamant that only some retarded figure like 10 percent of women are carousel riders. It's hilarious because she had a gang of partners and would have had way more if she hadn't gotten married. I don't know why rooshv forum members haven't trolled her hard. Her red pill knowledge is very minimal.
It's not so much about the number as much as what you consider a carousel rider. For example, is a woman with 1 partner a year a carousel rider? How about 2? 0.5?
My criteria are rather strict there - just a few partners is enough to permanently wreak havoc on a woman's psyche, so while I would not consider a woman with 0.5 partners a year (say, 5 by age 25) a slut by any means, I would still consider just as potentially damaged as sluts. Whether that makes her a carousel rider, I still don't know.
The beauty of today's feminist culture, similar to the endless Democrat-Republican conflict, is that it lets us fight over the number rather than the mentality that actually causes the damage.
That's why I think that my Jerk Reward Score (JRS) is a better measure of how damaged a woman is for serious relationships.
What if that same 25 year old girl only ever had two boyfriends in her life and those were her only sexual partners but then on her 25th birthday she went a little wild and had a train run on her by three guys in a night club bathroom? Does context matter in the number of dicks a girl has rode in her life?
Quote: (11-07-2015 03:41 AM)Mercenary Wrote:I cant think of a stranger question than asking your parents how many guys your mom has been with.
This is something I have wondered more about since I took the red pill, and considered the factors that make a stable marriage.
I mean your parents are not only are your first and primary role models of what a man and woman are, but their own personalities and interaction clearly influence how you start thinking male-female relationships work, so knowing their history is important. I know my lazy father and dominating, complaining and "I'm always the victim" playing mother clearly made me into a very strong beta (almost omega) in my teenage years and throughout my 20s.
My mom was already in her 30s when she met my father who was only a few years older than her. The marriage has lasted and they are still together today. However, it's not a fantastic one. They argue regularly, and from when I can remember, even as a small child I never saw any kissing, hugging, or PDA between them...not even in casual family photos. Seems like they stayed together simply because I was there as a kid, and after that, because they have known eachother for so long and don't want to be alone.
Before getting married my mom did a lot of travelling, especially across Europe. She also had her own car and was renting her own apartment. I have seen photos of her in her teenage years and when she was 20-30. She was good looking, feminine, although probably a bit on the bitchy side....but in any case, would definitely have been approached regularly. If I had to estimate I'd say somewhere between 5 and 20 different men before my father.
Today, with a red pill mindset, I know when she got married to my dad she was hitting that age where she was getting serious baby rabies and knew she had to settle. My estimation of my father (which wasn't great to begin with) went down much more when I consider it from this angle.
I have never had the guts to ask my mother her number....
...not that she would tell me the truth anyway. No woman ever does.
But if I ever did ask that question I would only do it when I was alone with her, and would watch her facial expression and body lanaguge very closely. She probably would be very uncomfortable and want to change the subject quickly.
Maybe I should ask my father his best guess, as he is more likely to give me a realistic estimate....but I just don't know if I want to know this information really.
It can lead down dark paths like finding out you had aborted brothers and sisters (or half siblings if she had them with someone else)...or that your dad white knighted and "rescued her" cause he wanted to be "captain save a ho".
Part of me wants to know and part of me doesn't.