Posts: 5,025
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
27
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 11:54 AM
I don't, I majored in it. However I am conservative and most are liberal so that always was a problem. Had to keep my opinions to my self a lot.
Posts: 2,806
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation:
34
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 12:25 PM
If women actually had the same ability in the arts - music, visual arts, literature - as men, then it would have showed up in some cultures centuries ago. Since women were restricted to the home and to "gentle" pursuits, why didn't painting and poetry become known as feminine endeavors? Even in an "oppressive patriarchy" they would have had the space to create works equal to that of Shakespeare and Beethoven, if they had been so inclined. The fact that this never happened indicates strongly to me, that women are incapable of it.
Posts: 2,467
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
254
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 02:07 PM
Schopenhauer pointed this out over 150 years ago. He said that women ultimately fail as great painters because they are unable to escape their inwardly focused, subjective view of the world (female solipsism), which means they can never develop the sort of objective, universal vision a painter needs to produce a work of genius.
Quote:Schopenhauer Wrote:
And you cannot expect anything else of women if you consider that the most distinguished intellects among the whole sex have never managed to produce a single achievement in the fine arts that is really great, genuine, and original; or given to the world any work of permanent value in any sphere. This is most strikingly shown in regard to painting, where mastery of technique is at least as much within their power as within ours — and hence they are diligent in cultivating it; but still, they have not a single great painting to boast of, just because they are deficient in that objectivity of mind which is so directly indispensable in painting. They never get beyond a subjective point of view. It is quite in keeping with this that ordinary women have no real susceptibility for art at all.
[size=8pt]"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”[/size] [size=7pt] - Romans 8:18[/size]
Posts: 3,652
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2012
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 03:01 PM
This is where I don't understand why women are knocking other average male painters with their average talent. If they are on equal terms to men, why don't they prove it?
The fact is that none of them have shit on the seventy year old German guy who made the argument. The article says that he is known as the greatest living painter. If he says "No woman painter has become great" then they have to best his work before they can be on equal terms in arguing or make any point that has weight. Just repeating the same crap over and over again and referring to female artists nobody has ever heard of is not effective argumentation. It's explaining to the reader that you're willing to ignore male artists while touting the works of your pets, of whom you select by gender.
Quote: (02-17-2013 12:25 PM)RawGod Wrote:
If women actually had the same ability in the arts - music, visual arts, literature - as men, then it would have showed up in some cultures centuries ago. Since women were restricted to the home and to "gentle" pursuits, why didn't painting and poetry become known as feminine endeavors? Even in an "oppressive patriarchy" they would have had the space to create works equal to that of Shakespeare and Beethoven, if they had been so inclined. The fact that this never happened indicates strongly to me, that women are incapable of it.
Yeah, even in an "oppressive patriarchy", if women actually had better skills in the visual arts a man would have noticed and capitalized on it. Since men haven't, they don't.
Posts: 4,481
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 03:52 PM
In any field - the best man is the best. The best man will always be better than the best woman. Although apparently women are better than men at cross-channel swimming due to the differences in the distribution of body-fat. So I'll give them that one.
Anyway - there is no such thing as a female genius since for every female 'genius' there will be many many men who are better than her. In any field. Here is a
female philosopher setting out the reasons why -
http://www.edge.org/q2008/q08_10.html#cronin
Also - I think Jackson Pollock is shit. And the reason he is famous is because he was a cold-war stooge for the CIA. His reputation was created as part of the propaganda war with the Soviets. You can read about it here -
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...78808.html
Posts: 4,481
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 04:07 PM
Also - you should check out 'The Manipulated Male' by Esther Vilar. It is an amazing book that Roosh wrote about recently. It is a short book (about 70 pages) - so you may as well just read it on your computer. There are lots of pdf files of it freely available on GOOGLE.
One of the subjects touched on in the book is the fact that women (as an earlier poster pointed out) have never utilised their free time to pursue greater interests (like art and science). And that they have no real desire to do so.
Instead - the men in society kept getting tricked into thinking that women were too 'oppressed' to do anything noteworthy and interesting with their lives.
Cardguy
PS It is rare that I read a book by a woman that is brilliant (the same is true for you - look at your bookshelf). But the one above is and it always delights me when I come across one since my observations are just that. Observations. And not burblings of misogynistic prejudice. Nothing would delight me more than if women could improve on the 3% of Nobel prizes they have won (I have removed the Nobel prize for Peace and Literature here since too many subjective criteria influence the awarding of that prize).
Posts: 1,930
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
50
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 04:39 PM
You know
if women were more capable than men at everything
you'd think they'd be more capable at not getting oppressed
Makes you wonder if that's their one weakness or something.
“I have a very simple rule when it comes to management: hire the best people from your competitors, pay them more than they were earning, and give them bonuses and incentives based on their performance. That’s how you build a first-class operation.”
― Donald J. Trump
If you want some PDF's on bodyweight exercise with little to no equipment, send me a PM and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
Posts: 5,025
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
27
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-17-2013, 10:08 PM
The big thing is the lack of new ideas. Granted that most guys even talented guys don't have new ideas. One thing I noticed in school that if you went into too new of ideas people would generally shun them. I see this also now if you do digital art. But the major innovations in art are usually from nerdy guys who usually don't get much credit for their work.
Posts: 2,057
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
31
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-18-2013, 09:52 AM
Women are very good at TECHNICAL arts. It's why so many women go into the design arts -- graphic design, jewelry design, clothing design.
They can also be terrific singers, instrument players (some of the current women violinists are pretty remarkable), and of courses, actresses. They can quite good at EXECUTING art.
Creating art? Not so much.
The only exception of note is literature, but there the great women writers have serious limits. Jane Austen and George Eliot (Marian Evans) are truly great novelists. Austen's novels, as purely constructed works of art, are astonishing. And George Eliot had a deep understanding of both male and female psychology. And Emily Dickinson is arguably the greatest female poet.
But Austen's world in the novels is really the circumscribed world of a woman's imagination, artfully rendered and amusingly ironic, but still quite limited. It's significant she never married. Dickinson, too, lived in a world of huge emotional constraints, and that she was likely a lesbian tells a lot.
And though George Eliot eventually married, she did so late, and if you looked at her pictures...well, manjaw doesn't begin to capture it. She was really Marian Horseface.
But even these exceptions prove the rule. It's great literature, but it isn't GROUNDBREAKING literature. It isn't Milton, Donne, Shakespeare, T.S. Eliot, or James Joyce. These are men who imagined worlds outside themselves, and could create the broadest visions of what the word on the page could do.
Posts: 647
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2013
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-18-2013, 12:32 PM
Posts: 170
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-18-2013, 04:35 PM
Another poor usage of advocacy; he's just playing right into the frame of "Men hate women".
I am seeing yet another round of feminist blogs using this guy as a piñata.
No benefit whatsoever to this guy running his mouth.
Posts: 908
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2011
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-18-2013, 06:27 PM
Quote: (02-18-2013 04:35 PM)tmason Wrote:
Another poor usage of advocacy; he's just playing right into the frame of "Men hate women".
I am seeing yet another round of feminist blogs using this guy as a piñata.
No benefit whatsoever to this guy running his mouth.
Well, he makes some good points, esp. about the disproportionately large number of women in art academies producing a disproportionately low amount of quality art. The disconnect between education and productivity produced by the large number of women pursuing "soft" degrees is an important current issue.
His language isn't particularly inflammatory. Much better to speak truth than snivel and back track in the delusional hopes of penetrating and persuading the limited female brain. You manipulate them to get sex. Otherwise, no need to censor yourself to please them. You really think people should be thinking of feminist bloggers when expressing their opinions? And you harm feminists by marginalizing and shaming them not by engaging with them.
Posts: 170
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-18-2013, 07:07 PM
Quote: (02-18-2013 06:27 PM)Lemmo Wrote:
Well, he makes some good points, esp. about the disproportionately large number of women in art academies producing a disproportionately low amount of quality art. The disconnect between education and productivity produced by the large number of women pursuing "soft" degrees is an important current issue.
His language isn't particularly inflammatory. Much better to speak truth than snivel and back track in the delusional hopes of penetrating and persuading the limited female brain. You manipulate them to get sex. Otherwise, no need to censor yourself to please them. You really think people should be thinking of feminist bloggers when expressing their opinions? And you harm feminists by marginalizing and shaming them not by engaging with them.
Far better to prove the point rather than explain it; host an art show with brand new artwork (with the names of artists removed) and ask renowned artists/critics/etc. to pick the artwork that is the best.
Host it every year. Make sure the critics/judges are women.
Rinse and repeat.
Posts: 253
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
11
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-18-2013, 10:19 PM
Thornton is right, the art market is heavily manipulated and controlled by a few major players who use it as a tool for investment. It isn't speculative, as the market is small enough that major purchases/the patronization of a single collector is itself enough to change the market. So in terms of the historical consensus of greatness, the commercial art market has a poor predictive record. “As always, the market is right.” is an incredibly stupid thing to say - you only need one example to prove him wrong, and there are many. I'll throw out the richest living artist, Damien Hirst, as an easy one.
Women have a slightly higher median IQ than men, but a smaller standard deviation. That in itself would explain why you'll find more women proficient in fields like this, but fewer lauded as historical geniuses.
The female surrealists were great - Remedios Varo, Dorothea Tanning, Leonora Carrington, Kahlo.
Posts: 5,025
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation:
27
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-18-2013, 10:26 PM
I also think there is more excellent male sculptors. This same part of the brain used here, the visual spacial part is why most men are better drivers as well on a more off tangent note.
Posts: 132
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2013
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-19-2013, 12:51 AM
As an Artist, it pains me to see women tarnish the canvas with their simplistic, cliche, paintings.
I'm currently working on my masterpiece.
It's going to be better than that melted clock painting.
Posts: 1,909
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
40
Women cannot paint well Georg Baselitz
02-19-2013, 09:46 PM
Is there anything that women generally do as well as men?