[alphacentauri]

As I said in the other thread, I am 100% behind Roosh's decision and wish him all the best, and will be sticking around as normal. However, there's stuff we need to keep talking about, and this won't be the place for them starting June 1. So where should we go to do it? I invite everyone's suggestions, and I will start us off with mine: Orgy of the Will: A Philosophy of the Future: http://orgyofthewill.net/

Here are some nuggets to give you an idea of the site's philosophy:

Quote:

846. People ask "what has philosophy accomplished" as if their whole society isn't predicated on innoculating unwitting idiots with primitive philosophical axioms. We were feral before philosophy. All science is merely applied epistemology.

Quote:

843. The only afterlife you should be concerned with is the world you leave your children.

Quote:

842. If you went to ancient Greece or Rome, and told the guys there the bs Krauser peddles on his blog every day that, "Your value as a man can be gauged by how women respond to you", you'd have been laughed at. It is MEN who judge men's value, not women. Even for getting women, you had to convince the MEN to give them to you in those days — at no point was a woman's opinion consulted. The mere fact that, in gauging men's value, Krauser and his ilk CONSIDER WOMEN'S OPINIONS AT ALL is PROOF POSITIVE that these dudes are gammas. It is laughable.

Quote:

823. Everyone's behavior is consistent from their own point of view. The most egregiously jagged line looks straight if you are short-sighted enough; and conversely, there are people of such subtlety who theorized — even before the invention of magnifying lenses and microscopes — that lines that look perfectly straight to them were, in fact, jagged.

Quote:

818. It is astonishing to me that popularizing scribblers like Dawkins et al. still adhere to a fundamental difference between "facts" and "opinions" over a hundred years after relativity theory, in which observers moving with different speeds (i.e. everyone, since we are all ultimately "moving with different speeds") can't even agree on what time of the day it is, let alone on anything more complex. In modern physics, the time of the day or the dimensions of an object, or its speed, or any other attribute of it whatsoever, are a matter of opinion, dear popularizing scribblers! and it is a disgrace that you, who have taken it upon yourselves to explain modern science to the general public, still fail to grasp this, despite all the pompous titles you hold and academic chairs you occupy between you. Nietzsche had already grasped it several decades before relativity ("There are no facts, only interpretations"), and without any mathematics, but if you blockheads still fail to grasp it even with math you should be made to eat the stupid dogmatic books with which you are poisoning the public's mind in the name of a naive, simplistic "objectivity"! (On the other hand, relativity theory is "Continental", since it was created by a German, and after all it's "merely a theory", without which our spacecraft wouldn't function, among many other things, and that's why the "pragmatic", "realist" Anglo-Saxons like Dawkins and his ilk are still stuck on Medieval Newtonian physics lol — and that's a fact, retards!)

Quote:

796. Is the truth to the Right or to the Left? — The "truth" is the continued functioning and maximization of productivity of any given society, for this is the objective of societies: production, not a pissing contest for the victory of some abstract-theoretical ideology. So at any given point in time the "truth" is on precisely that mixture of Right and Left policies that allows the society to function at its maximum rate of productivity. Everything else is "ideology" — and pretty stupid ideology at that too.

The forum is not free, but the value of the content and the level of discourse make the price well worth it for me.

So that's my contribution. I look forward to everyone's suggestions, and will be checking out all of them thoroughly.