[DChambers]

(04-12-2015 09:25 PM)kosko Wrote:  

I called this 4 years ago. Benghazi was the only real hope to kill the wicked witch of D.C. for good. That literally almost destroyed her political career and we would of been ridden of the Ghoul from Gotham named Hillary. After nearing loosing her political marbles and gaming 40 pounds and aging 40 years she went into the chamber (I suspect HGH.. but hey just my speculation) to shed some years of her and not appear like a lifeless fossil and now just looks like a boring grandmother instead.

I don't know what RVF does politically. Every 4 years the mass majority get way to invested and start digesting large amounts of junk media and mainstream opinions only to moan more and more of how stuff keeps on getting worse for the average man. For Hillary to get to this point, it was all lad down very clearly many years ago. If you are of a critical political mind this can't even surprise you. Any dude truly in the Red Pill just laughs at this. It was so easy to see coming.

Next, people seem to be forgetting the money aspect. The only legitimate candidates are the ones who can pull in that dirty money. This will likely be a $2 billion dollar contest. Which of those Republican empty suits can pull $1 billion?+

People need to get with it that this game is rigged. Hillary out of all them has the biggest money pull potential which should easily hammer in that this whole campaign is rigged from the start. Who else in that list above can pull that money?

From the money standpoint alone you can already guess who it will be:

Jeb Bush Vs. Hillary Clinton

Two nepotistic family clans with access to billions going against each other. The media will have a field day with it and Americans will remain clueless as to how two families have ruled all political office in the most of the modern age post-Cold war. Its is too obvious but you know the average American who likes Hardes, his K-Cup Coffee machine, and NASCAR is as dumb as doorknob and won't be able to connect those dots.

So now the Republicans will roll out a dummy doll, likely in Jeb Bush who will do the usual of being ultra extreme to get the hard of right in Iowa down and then be a walking contradiction once the primaries are won and he is on the national stage appealing to all sides, thus to become a dead horse and unelectable. The Republicans are in ideology trap as the power and money in their corner is held by its most extreme which are distasteful to the majority of Americans.

Hillary will be during her campaign more "right" then Obama who was a beta all all about passivity and striking deals. She has 8 years of softy beta man leadership to profile against and since she is woman she can talk "tough" and nobody will fault her for it. As I have noted before, expect her to be aggressive on war/foreign policy. Iran for example and the softy deal the USA signed with Iran, watch Hillary be able to troll and act like she has some fake nuts in talking hot rhetoric to Iran in contrasting her as more dominate then Obama.

So once again, political threads like this proves that many on this forum on only "red pill" with pussy. Look at all the cheerleding for Rand Paul when the fact of the matter is.. for him to be a "viable" candidate, he has to shill and grovel like all the rest of the deadbeats of the past to bend over to Wall Street and other corrupt interests whom will shower him with the $1 Billion needed to compete. The flavor of the month here is Rand Paul, and ff he is in fact a legit "candidate" then he is corrupted. It is just that simple. The process in this modern age does not steer towards any other direction, viable and real candidates get marginalized, and ran through the mud in the press, or simply ignored.

I simply accepted the fact that Hillary would be accented to the throne when Obama squeezed out a 2nd term. Once Obama did that I knew the Republicans were DOA and would not be a factor the next time around. You saw quickly the shift towards preparing the media landscape for this election with the assault on gender and propping and protection of the female narrative on all aspects.

Like I said before. Understand and accept the game is rigged and get your popcorn out. I can't wait for this mess of campaign, the amount of material coming out of it will be pure gold.

Its a waste of time bickering on which side of the coin is going to fuck you over the least. Neither party has your best interest in mind and all work for the same corrupt interests.

Your better off using that effort to get your shit in check for when the folly comes full circle. Hillary in the POTUS seat means that the small bit of rope that modern men had left in this modern age will be taken away. Economically Men are already 2nd class, the economy has been nearly full tilted towards women. Next, Socially Men have been tarred and feathered through all means of SJW crusades to paint anything with a penis as evil and the devil. Now all that is left is to shut the books on the any shred of male focus left in the political sphere. The world of politics has been a female oasis for while now but Hillary will be the last straw. So instead of arguing over which losers will never win (Rand Paul, Jeb Bush, etc).

Kosko. With all due respect, while you have a great deal of insight into many topics, I find your political insights rather less than clear. You have a firm cynicism and apathy that shows contempt for almost any figure. While this isn't necessarily wrong (though I personaly think it is) you have in the past it appears let your apathy cloud your judgement. You at one point said,


"But for Ron Pauls son Rand? His son sold out 100% to be given the higher platforms his father was never granted. This "chance" Rand Paul has in. 2016 will simply via the same manufactured machine that gave Obama the same chance. The money might come from different hands but the greater forces all push the political class towards the same direction."

Which is ridiculous as his record shows. A sell out is a harsh term. He altered some positions a bit to be elected, but he maintains his libertarian positions on the important issues.

I have to wonder, do you view any candidate in a negative light if they reach a prominent position simply because you believe a power must be behind them in order to reach such a position?