[Moma]

(08-26-2011 01:31 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(08-26-2011 12:58 PM)Moma Wrote:  

(08-26-2011 12:53 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

Those of you who talk shit about HGH and steroids generally sound as childish and naive and game denialists.

Steroids is game? I guess you are a juicer, eh? List the type of gear you are on or have been on?

Also list pros and cons.

Typo. Should have said as game denialists.

You know how you view guys who say "Game doesn't work"? Well, that's who guys like me view people who say, "Steroids shrink your dick," "HGH doesn't work," etc.

Asking one to list pros and cons is like saying, "Prove game works!" It's a waste of time. Either you're clued in, or you aren't.

And there are lots of reliable sources to clue you in....

I am just curious to hear your views. I've been working out avidly for years (won't juice up though) but a few of my close friends have been on the full works glen, HGH etc and of course their bodies looked amazing.

So I know this shyt from up close. My mates said that their balls do shrink a bit, I think they used gear properly though to minimise the effect.

One of the lads did suffer from bitch tits though. So this isn't a heated rage against not doing roids.

I personally wouldn't want to do roids because of:

1) The expense - HGH was going for around 1000 quid a vial or something in the UK at the time

2) I don't like to alter my body with unnatural chemicals too much. My body responds very well both to positive substances and negatives.

That, however, is my take on it.

For YMG to be using HGH just to cut up seems a bit premature in my view.

I think being on the gear should be a last resort (a bit like paying prepagos for punni).

You smell me, sailor?