Quote: (10-02-2014 11:51 PM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:
Quote: (10-02-2014 11:00 PM)Samseau Wrote:
Good tragic yet manly story here. Bully was following some kid around, harassing and threatening him. After days of being bullied, the kid turns around and smashes the bullies face.
Samseau, I get the impression that you sometimes intentionally twist facts around to fit your own biases.
From the article:
Quote:Quote:
At the press conference, Wilber said that school records show that both boys had disrupted classes and been in fights, but never with each other before September 25.
A week before, Teer had collided with one of Escritt's friends, who had his arm in a cast, during a ballgame and the two boys argued, the Omaha World-Herald reported.
That night, Escritt sent Teer a message on Facebook telling him to leave his friends alone, and Teer responded with a similarly foul-mouthed message, telling the teenager to mind his own business.
Days later, Escritt was seen following Teer at school before pushing him, ultimately leading to the fatal shove.
I.e. two high school hotheads go to war over something that Teer started, and Escritt dies, and then you come here and post that Teer is some sort of hero for standing up to bullying when it was Teer who started the process by beating up one of Escritt's friends?
What did I misread? I think you may have misread. Go through it line by line:
Quote:Quote:
At the press conference, Wilber said that school records show that both boys had disrupted classes and been in fights, but never with each other before September 25.
Sound like regular boys to me.
Quote:Quote:
A week before, Teer had collided with one of Escritt's friends, who had his arm in a cast, during a ballgame and the two boys argued, the Omaha World-Herald reported.
So an accident precipitated everything. Another time I raise my eyebrow at the school - they let a kid whose arm is in a cast to play in a ballgame? How exactly did this happen?
Quote:Quote:
That night, Escritt sent Teer a message on Facebook telling him to leave his friends alone, and Teer responded with a similarly foul-mouthed message, telling the teenager to mind his own business.
So it was the kid who died who started it. Notice it says, "similarly foul-mouthed," so we know Escritt started with the aggression and it was returned to him.
Funnily enough, not only did you do the misreading, but then you projected it onto me and unintentionally may have revealed your own biases.
Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.