[AnonymousBosch]

(07-17-2014 10:22 PM)Turnaround Wrote:  

So, hairy-legged beasts, if you're unwilling to fulfill attractiveness standards that only apply to women, that's your choice. But then don't expect to find a man who:

-earns a nice living
-is muscular
-is tall
-is confident & charismatic
-is funny
-makes the first move
-plans and pays for dates
-is handy
-is mature and independent

If you, as a feminist, truly believe in equality, you have no right to have these attributes on your checklist, because they're ONLY expected of men. Gosh, isn't that so fucked up and oppressive?

I was speaking in another thread about The Modern Feminist as subscribing to Victorian Romantic Sensibility where she is valued for who she is as a person rather than her beauty. Of course, this can only be proven if she attracts the highest value man possible, who has a choice of many beautiful woman but chooses her over their 'shallow beauty'. A low value man can't add power to the fantasy, because he lacks options.

A List Of 209 'Plain Jane And Hot Stud' Romance Novels To Illustrate This Still Exists In 2014

There's one called 'Butterface'.



It seems to be a dominant fantasy of privileged, educated women whenever society is undergoing extreme social class stratification the way we are now.

The problem is feminism encourages them to think the fantasy stands a realistic chance of coming true.