[placer]

As someone who both supports Hillary being president and thinks about 25-50% of rape accusations are false, my sense is that this article just regurgitates the bullshit from this supposed victim.

Quote:

12-year-old in Arkansas

• The age of consent in Arkansas today is 16
• A lot of girls develop early and can look like a young adult at 13 or even 12
  

Quote:

This woman says Hillary smeared her

Again, this article is based on the hearsay of a single woman describing events from 40 years ago.

Quote:

“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

The article presents no evidence why we shouldn't believe this and some evidence that we should.

Some more telling evidence from the article

Quote:

prison where the victim was serving time for drug-related offenses

This woman is a criminal with a criminal history.

Quote:

The victim was put through several forensic procedures, including a lie detector test. At first, she failed the lie detector test

And she failed the lie detector test when asked if she was raped.

Quote:

she spent five days afterwards in a coma, months recovering from the beating that accompanied the rape

So claims the "victim". If this were true, why was there no physical evidence of this? Why weren't the supposed assailants prosecuted for battery?

One last thing: The Daily Beast has a history of regurgitating feminist malarkey